Abstract
Philosophers have tried to grasp the notion of scientific explanation, either by looking for some essential features, such as inherent logical properties that every explanation has to satisfy, or by arguing that a true scientific explanation must appeal to some specific kind of factual relationship existing in the world. For instance, Hempel’s model of explanation in science was based on clear conviction that all explanations could be characterized as an argument which states that the phenomenon to be explained follows deductively from some general laws. Although he did not deny the pragmatic side of explanation, the model of explanation he presented is abstracted from those contexts in which scientists use explanations. One may therefore wonder whether it is possible to find such a context-free notion of scientific explanation without losing sight of the cognitive purpose of providing explanations?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Jan Faye
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Faye, J. (2014). Scientific Explanation. In: The Nature of Scientific Thinking. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137389831_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137389831_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-38982-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38983-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)