Abstract
Governments around the globe increasingly recognize that “creating successful universities requires a supportive governance structure in which universities or colleges have autonomy to achieve objectives, whether research or teaching, with the appropriate level of accountability” (Raza 2009: 2). Although there is ample evidence of a shifting government-university nexus, it seems too early to conclude that universities in the developed countries have become more autonomous and more accountable. This chapter seeks to explore reasons behind multidirectional changes. It argues that shifting the balance of autonomy and accountability is not entirely a discretional decision of policymakers or of the management of universities. Reforms are constrained by existing institutions that emerged from a unique mix of previous decisions. Hence, similar policy initiatives lead to diverging time- and place-specific outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Clark, Burton R. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.
Estermann, Thomas, Terhi Nokkala, and Monika Steinel. University Autonomy in Europe II: The Scorecard. Brussels: European University Association, 2011.
Nakrošis, Vitalis, and Žilvinas Martinaitis. Lithuanian Agencies and Other Public Sector Organisations: Organisation, Autonomy, Control and Performance. Vilnius: Vilnius University Press, 2011.
Raza, Reehana. Examining Autonomy and Accountability in Public and Private Tertiary Institutions. Washington DC: The World Bank Publications, 2009.
Tsebelis, George. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Verhoest, Koen, Bram Verschuere, and Geert Bouckaert. “Pressure, Legitimacy and Innovative Behavior by Public Organisations.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 20, no. 3 (2007): 469–497.
—, Kristin Rubecksen, and Peter Humphreys. “Structure and Autonomy of Public Sector Agencies in Norway, Ireland and Flanders (Belgium): Does Politico-Administrative Culture Help Us to Understand Similarities and Differences?” EGOS Conference. Bergen, 2006.
Williamson, Oliver E. “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead.” Journal of Economic Literature 38, no. 3 (2000): 598–613.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2016 Žilvinas Martinaitis, Simonas Gaušas and Agnė Paliokaitė
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martinaitis, Ž., Gaušas, S., Paliokaitė, A. (2016). Cultural and Constitutional Embeddedness of University Autonomy in Lithuania. In: Turcan, R.V., Reilly, J.E., Bugaian, L. (eds) (Re)Discovering University Autonomy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137388728_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137388728_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55212-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38872-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)