Skip to main content

Attachment and Culture: An Introduction

  • Chapter
Attachment Reconsidered

Part of the book series: Culture, Mind, and Society ((CMAS))

Abstract

The fundamental argument that motivates this volume, namely that attachment theory’s claims and constructs suffer from profound ethnocentrism, is not new. A handful of cross-cultural researchers have raised these worries since the early days of attachment theory, for more than a quarter century now. Most of these earlier critiques questioned the cross-cultural applicability of a category system that designated children’s attachment to their caregivers as secure versus insecure, and measurement along this dimension by means of the Strange Situation (SS)—an experimental procedure for testing the child’s relative security through absenting its mother from the laboratory. The current volume expands this critique beyond questions of classification and measurement, to question the cultural assumptions behind such a category system and such an experimental design, and extends this line of questioning to ethnocentric concepts beyond insecure attachment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Althusser, Louis. 1971. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays (Ben Brewster, trans.). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, Inge. 1985. “Attachment Theory: Retrospect and Prospect.” In Growing Points of Attachment Theory and Research, Inge Bretherton and Everett Waters, eds. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial No. 209, 50:1/2:3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, Inge. 1991. “The Roots and Growing Points of Attachment Theory.” In Attachment across the Life Cycle, Colin M. Parkes, Joan Stevenson-Hinde, and Peter Marris, eds., pp. 9–32. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Jean. 1998. Inuit Morality Play: The Emotional Education of a Three-Year-Old. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, Jude. 2008. “The Nature of the Child’s Ties.” In Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, 2nd edition, Jude Cassidy and Phillip R. Shaver, eds., pp. 3–22. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, Jude, and Phillip R. Shaver. 2008. Preface to Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, 2nd edition, Jude Cassidy and Phillip R. Shaver, eds., pp. xi–xvi. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiao, Joan Y., and Katherine D. Blizinsky. 2009. Culture-Gene Coevolution of Individualism-Collectivism and the Serotonin Transporter Gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277:529–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, James. 1996. “The Evolutionary Ecology of Attachment Organization.” Human Nature 7(1):1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doi, Takeo. 1992. “On the concept of amae.” Infant Mental Health Journal 13(1):7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, Peter, George Gergely, and Mary Target. 2008. “Psychoanalytic Constructs and Attachment Theory and Research.” In Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, 2nd edition, Jude Cassidy and Phillip R. Shaver, eds., pp. 783–810. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. A. 2009. “Linking Social Change and Developmental Change.” Developmental Psychology 45(2):401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Karin, Klaus E. Grossman, Gottfried Spangler, Gerhard Suess, and Lothar Unzner. 1985. “Maternal Sensitivity and Newborns’ Orientation Responses as Related to Quality of Attachment in Northern Germany.” In Growing Points of Attachment Theory and Research, Inge Bretherton and Everett Waters, eds. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial No. 209, 50:1/2:233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubernick, David. 1981. “Parent and Infant Attachment in Mammals.” In Parental Care in Mammals, David Gubernick and Peter Klopfer, eds., pp. 243–305. New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer. 2009. Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Belknap).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Heidi. 2007. Cultures of Infancy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, Michael E., ed. 2010. The Role of Fathers in Child Development, 5th edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, Robert A. in press. “Attachment Theory as Cultural Ideology.” In Different Faces of Attachment: Cultural Variations of a Universal Human Need, Heidi Keller and Hiltrud Otto, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, Robert A., and Patrice M. Miller. 1990. “Commentary.” Human Development (Special Topic: Cross-Cultural Validity of Attachment Theory) 33(1):73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, Robert A., and Karin Norman. 2001. “The Infant’s Acquisition of Culture: Early Attachment Reexamined in Anthropological Perspective.” In The Psychology of Cultural Experience, Carmella C. Moore and Holly F. Mathews, eds., pp. 83–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert. 1955. Eros and Civilization. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Joan G. 2002. “Bringing Culture to Basic Psychological Theory—Beyond Individualism and Collectivism: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002).” Psychological Bulletin 128(1):97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, Kazuo, Shing-jen Chen, and Joseph J. Campos. 1985. “Infant Temperament, Mother’s Mode of Interaction, and Attachment in Japan: An Interim Report.” In Growing Points of Attachment Theory and Research, Inge Bretherton and Everett Waters, eds. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial No. 209, 50:1/2:276–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purves, Dale, George J. Augustine, David Fitzpatrick, William C. Hall, Anthony-Samuel LaMantia, James O. McNamara, and Leonard E. White, eds. 2008. Neuroscience, 4th edition. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbaum, Fred, Gilda Morelli, and Natalie Rusk. 2011. “Attachment, Learning, and Coping: The Interplay of Cultural Similarities and Differences”. In Advances in Culture and Psychology, vol. 1, Michelle Gelfand, Chi-yue Chiu, and Ying-yi Hong, eds., pp. 153–215. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbaum, Fred, John Weisz, Martha Pott, Kazuo Miyake, and Gilda Morelli. 2000. “Attachment and Culture: Security in the United States and Japan.” American Psychologist 55(10):1093–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagi, Abraham. 1990. “Attachment Theory and Research from a Cross-Cultural Perspective.” Human Development 33(1):10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Judith, and Carol George. 2008. “The Measurement of Attachment Security and Related Concepts in Infancy and Early Childhood.” In Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, 2nd edition, Jude Cassidy and Phillip R. Shaver, eds., pp. 383–416. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Janet T. 1985. “Achievement American-style: The Rewards and Costs of Individualism.” (The 1985 American Psychological Association Presidential Address.) American Psychologist 40:1285–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, Melford E. 1961. “An Overview and a Suggested Reorientation.” In Psychological Anthropology, Francis L. K. Hsu, ed., pp. 472–497. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, Melford E. 1965. “Religious Systems as Culturally Constituted Defense Mechanisms.” In Context and Meaning in Cultural Anthropology, Melford E. Spiro, ed., pp. 100–113. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suomi, Stephen J. 2008. “Attachment in Rhesus Monkeys.” In Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, 2nd edition, Jude Cassidy and Phillip R. Shaver, eds., pp. 173–191. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, Keiko. 1990. “Are the Key Assumptions of the ‘Strange Situation’ Procedure Universal? A View from Japanese Research.” Human Development 33(1):23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, Margaret. 1998. “Attachment Theory: The Ultimate Experiment.” New York Times Magazine, May 24:24–30, 38, 46, 50, 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronick, Edward Z., Gilda A. Morelli, and Paula K. Ivey. 1992. “The Efe Forager Infant and Toddler’s Pattern of Social Relationshiops: Multiple and Simultaneous.” Develomental Psychology 28(4):568–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ijzendoorn, Marinus H., and Pieter M. Kroonenberg. 1988. “Cross-Cultural Patterns of Attachment: A Meta-analysis of the Strange Situation.” Child Development 59(1):147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ijzendoorn, Marinus H., and Abraham Sagi-Schwartz. 2008. “Cross-Cultural Patterns of Attachment: Universals and Contextual Dimensions.” In Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, 2nd edition, Jude Cassidy and Phillip R. Shaver, eds., pp. 880–905. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinfeld, Nancy S., L. Alan Sroufe, Byron Egeland, and Elizabeth Carlson. 2008. “Individual Differences in Infant-Caregiver Attachment: Conceptual and Empirical Aspects of Security.” In Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, 2nd edition, Jude Cassidy and Phillip R. Shaver, eds., pp. 78–101. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisner, Thomas S. 2005. “Commentary: Attachment as a Cultural and Ecological Problem with Pluralistic Solutions.” Human Development 48(1/2):89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Naomi Quinn Jeannette Marie Mageo

Copyright information

© 2013 Naomi Quinn and Jeannette Marie Mageo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Quinn, N., Mageo, J.M. (2013). Attachment and Culture: An Introduction. In: Quinn, N., Mageo, J.M. (eds) Attachment Reconsidered. Culture, Mind, and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137386724_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics