Skip to main content

Youth Breaking New “Ground”: Iconicity and Meaning Making in Social Media

  • Chapter
Critical Perspectives on Technology and Education

Abstract

This chapter argues for a semiotic approach to understanding and productively facilitating the interaction and learning that young people do via social media. As an organizing analogy for what follows, we first call forth the enduring Indian parable of The Blind Men and the Elephant. This story, many will know, describes the initial encounter between six unsighted sages and a pachyderm, an exotic creature of which none of the men have any prior knowledge. The essential premise is that each of the men differently identifies the beast, based only upon his particular tactile experience of it. Touching the elephant’s flank, one man explains it as “very like a wall,” as nineteenth-century poet John Godfrey Saxe’s version has it. The man who feels the trunk recognizes the elephant’s snake-like quality; a tusk is perceived to be a “spear”; and so forth. The important lessons, for present purposes, are that 1) what an unknown something seems like can fundamentally shape a person’s interpretation of what that thing itself is, and that 2) a thing and that which it resembles are really more subjectively and partially related than one might otherwise believe. These are ideas that resonate closely with C. S. Peirce’s (1935, 1940/1955) influential theory of “iconicity” in human meaning making, which this chapter engages and operationalizes as a critical lens through which to look afresh at learning, literacies, and global digital media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Art Institute of Chicago. (2013). Art access. Oba’s altar tusk. Retrieved from http://www.artic.edu/aic/collections/exhibitions/African/Tusk

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, V. (2009). Older adolescent’s motivations for social network site use: The influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). http://firstmonday.org/a rticle/view/1394/1312

  • Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd. d. (2007). Social networking sites: Public, private, or what? Knowledge Tree, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd, d. (2008). Why youth [heart] social networking sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd, d. & Hargittai, E. (2010). Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? First Monday, 15 (8). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3086/2589

  • Brake, D. (2008). Shaping the “me” in MySpace: The framing of profiles on a social network site. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (pp. 285–299). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (2012). Friendship 2.0: Adolescents’ experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. Journal of Adolescence, 35(6), 1527–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1978). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facebook Newsroom. (2014). Company info. Retrieved on March 22, 2014, from https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/

  • Fuchs, C. (2011). An alternative view of privacy on Facebook. Information, 2(1), 140–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2003). Saussure and his interpreters (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B. (1988). Protean shapes in literacy events. In E. R. Kintgen, B. M. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy (pp. 348–370). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G. (2003). Youth culture and digital media: New literacies for new times. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 229–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., & Katz, M. (2006). Crafting an agentive self: Case studies on digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., Kenney, N., Marple, S., & Forsman-Schneider, A. (2006). Many versions of masculine: Explorations of boys’ identity formation through multimodal composing in an after-school program. Robert F. Bowne Foundation’s Occasional Papers Series. New York: Robert F. Bowne Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., & Nelson, M.E. (2009). Literacy, media, and morality: Making the case for an aesthetic turn. In M. Baynham & M. Prinsloo (eds.), The future of literacy studies (pp. 199–227). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, S. (January, 2014). Social, digital and mobile worldwide in 2014. Retrieved from http://wearesocial.net/tag/qzone

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkland, D. (2009). Shaping the digital pen: Media literacy, youth culture, and Myspace. Youth Media Reporter, 188–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (1993). Against arbitrariness: The social production of the sign as a foundational issue. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 169–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996/2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, K. (2008). Toward a connective ethnography of online/offline literacy networks. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 34–65). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusk, B. (2010). Digital natives and social media behaviors: An overview. Prevention Researcher, 17(5), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U. Duggan, M., Smith, A., & Beaten, M. (2013). Teens, social media, and privacy. Retrieved from the Pew Internet and American Life Project at http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/05/21/teens-social-media-and-privacy/

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. E., Hull, G., & Roche-Smith, J. (2008). Challenges of multimedia self-presentation: Taking, and mistaking, the show on the road. Written Communication, 25(4), 415–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, M. (1994). The language of displayed art. London: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn, and A Small World. New Media & Society, 11(1–2), 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patchin, J., & Hinduja, S. (2010). Trends in online social networking: Adolescent use of MySpace over time. New Media and Society, 12(2), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. V and VI: Pragmatism and pragmaticism and scientific metaphysics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1940/1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkel, D. (2008). Copy and paste literacy: Literacy practices in the production of a MySpace profile. In K. Drotner, H. Sigaard-Jenssen, & C. Schroeder (Eds.), Informal learning and digital media (pp. 203–224). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. de. (1966). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, tr.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes toward the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone, R. (2007). Media and morality: On the rise of the Minchome diapolis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvan, E. (2006). Who knows whom in a virtual learning network? Applying social network analysis to communities of learners at the Computer Clubhouse. In S. Barab, D. Hickey & K. Hay (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference on the learning sciences (pp. 4–6). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tynes, B. M. (2007). Internet safety gone wild? Sacrificing the educational and psychosocial benefits of online social environments. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(6), 575–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L. (2002). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L. (2008). Multiliteracies and metalanguage: Describing image/text relations as a resource for negotiating multimodal texts. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 379–408). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utz, S., & Kramer, N. (2009). The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(2). Article 1: http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2009111001&article=1

  • Valkenberg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2008). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet: Consequences for social competence and self-concept unity. Communication Research, 35(2), 208–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (1991). Common culture: Symbolic work at play in the everyday cultures of the young. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (2000). The ethnographic imagination. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1816–1836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Scott Bulfin Nicola F. Johnson Chris Bigum

Copyright information

© 2015 Scott Bulfin, Nicola F. Johnson, and Chris Bigum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, M.E., Marple, S., Hull, G. (2015). Youth Breaking New “Ground”: Iconicity and Meaning Making in Social Media. In: Bulfin, S., Johnson, N.F., Bigum, C. (eds) Critical Perspectives on Technology and Education. Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385451_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics