Skip to main content

Extending Understandings of Educational Technology: Teachers’ Critiques of Educational Technology as Important Intellectual Capital for Researchers

  • Chapter
Critical Perspectives on Technology and Education

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning ((DEAL))

Abstract

While research in the field of educational technology provides teachers with intellectual resources on how best to use technology, teacher uptake appears to be at best minimal. These intellectual resources, arising from research, are often presented to teachers as pedagogical imperatives and include, for example, e-learning, and connected teaching. Taking up these recommended resources requires significant commitment by teachers to transform their practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bennett, S., & Oliver, M. (2011). Talking back to theory: The missed opportunities in learning technology research. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. (2011). On critique: A sociology of emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (March, 2010). Technology for nurture in large classes. Fellowship Report. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciftci, M., & Kurt, S. (2012). Barriers to teachers’ use of technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 39(3), 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Convery, A. (2009). The pedagogy of the impressed: How teachers became victims of technological vision. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research in Technology Education, 42(3), 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, B. (1987). Critical social science. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, A., Kurumada, K., Fisher, T., & Zisook, K. (2010). The perfect storm: Creating an alternative to professional development. Professional Development in Education, 37(1), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, N. (2009). Rethinking e-learning research. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heid, H. (2005). The domestication of critique: Problems of justifying the critical in the context of educationally relevant thought and action. In F. Heyting & C. Winch (Eds.), Conformism and critique in liberal society (pp. 12–28). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyting, F., & Winch, C. (2005). The role of critique in philosophy of education: Its subject matter and its ambiguities. In F. Heyting & C. Winch (Eds.), Conformism and critique in liberal society (pp. 1–11). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Z., & McGrath, I. (2011). Innovation in higher education in China: Are teachers ready to integrate ICT in English language teaching? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkuska-Hulme, A. (2010). Mobile learning as a catalyst for change, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25(3), 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERC-Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, E. (2008). Unlearning how to teach. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 45(3), 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J., & Wood, E. (2012). Patterns of beliefs, attitudes, and characteristics of teachers that influence computer integration. Education Research International, Article ID 697357. doi:10.1155/2012/697357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2005). The selection and definition of key competencies: Executive summary. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlando, J. (2009). Understanding changes in teachers’ information and communication technology practices: A longitudinal perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando, J. (2013a). ICT mediated practice and constructivist practices: Is this still the best plan for teachers’ uses of ICT? Pedagogy, Education and Technology, 22(2), 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando, J. (2013b). Engaging practices with ICT in low SES schools. In G. Munns, W. Sawyer, & B. Cole (Eds.), Exemplary teachers of students in poverty (pp. 136–148). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlando, J. (2014). Veteran teachers and technology: Change fatigue and knowledge insecurity influence practice. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 20(4), 427–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papastephanou, M. (2005). Educational critique, critical thinking and the critical philosophical traditions. In F. Heyting & C. Winch (Eds.), Conformism and critique in liberal society (pp. 55–63). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2002). Learning for the 21st century: A report and mile guide for 21st century skills. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pena, M. I., & Yeung, A. S. (2010). Satisfaction with online learning: Does university students’ computer competence matter? International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 6(5), 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schibeci, R., MacCallum, J., Cumming-Potvin, W., Durrant, C., Kissane, B., & Nolen, E. (2008). Teachers’ journeys towards critical use of ICT. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwille, J., & Dembele, M. (2007). Global perspectives on teacher learning: Improving policy and practice. Fundamentals of Educational Planning series, No. 84. Paris: IIEP/UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001502/150261e.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2011). In praise of pessimism—the need for negativity in educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 713–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M., Reid, J., Mayer, D., & Santoro, N. (2013). Teacher education, research and the renewal of critique. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown up digital: how the web is changing your world. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Draft National Educational Technology Plan, Executive Summary. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Technology, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/NETP-2010-exec-summary.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright V., & Wilson, E. (2009). Using technology in social studies classrooms: The journey of two teachers. Journal of Social Studies Research, 33(2), 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (2009). Education, globalization and the “voice of knowledge.” Journal of Education and Work, 22(3), 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Scott Bulfin Nicola F. Johnson Chris Bigum

Copyright information

© 2015 Scott Bulfin, Nicola F. Johnson, and Chris Bigum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Orlando, J. (2015). Extending Understandings of Educational Technology: Teachers’ Critiques of Educational Technology as Important Intellectual Capital for Researchers. In: Bulfin, S., Johnson, N.F., Bigum, C. (eds) Critical Perspectives on Technology and Education. Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385451_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics