Skip to main content

The Work of Theory in Ed-Tech Research

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning ((DEAL))

Abstract

Acknowledging the constructivist nature of meaning-making, “theory” means different things to different people (and to scholars). In writing this chapter, I was encouraged by colleagues (my fellow editors Scott and Chris acting as difficult and supportive reviewers) to think about and identify what theory actually means to me. The exhortation was that I needed to have a theory about theory in order to write about it (theory!).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2005). What’s left? Just the future, Antipode, 37(2), 220–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anyon, J. (2009). Theory and educational research: Toward critical social explanation. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2006). The necessity and violence of theory. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., & Oliver, M. (2011). Talking back to theory: The missed opportunities in learning technology research. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigum, C., & Kenway, J. (2005). New information technologies and the ambiguous future of schooling—some possible scenarios. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Extending educational change: International handbook of educational change (pp. 95–115). The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Briggle, A. R. (2014). Opening the black box: The social outcomes of scientific research. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 28(2), 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulfin, S. (2009). Cyber-savvy students and industrial-era schools? Disassembling and recasting the new home-school mismatch hypothesis. Refereed paper presented at the AATE/ALEA Conference, Australia, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulfin, S., Henderson, M., & Johnson, N. F. (2013). Examining the use of theory within educational technology and media research. Learning, Media & Technology, 38(3), 337–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulfin, S., Henderson, M., Johnson, N. F. & Selwyn, N. (2014). Methodological capacity within the field of “educational technology”: An initial investigation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 403–414. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (2012). Theory matters: Representation and experimentation in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 522–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fendler, L. (2012). Lurking, distilling, exceeding, vibrating. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(3), 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, C., & Steel, C. (2012). Linking theory to practice in learning technology research. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 16148, doi: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.16148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1, 1–12, doi: 10.1177/2053951714528481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: what do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundahl, L. (2012). Educational theory in an era of knowledge capitalism. Studies in Philosophy and Education, (31)3, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. H. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosiek, J. L. (2013). Pragmatism and post-qualitative futures, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 692–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N., Johnson, N. F., Bulfin, S. & Henderson, M. (2013). Academic research in education, technology and media: Mapping the “field.” “First sight” research report. Learning with New Media Research Group, Faculty of Education, Monash University, January. Available from http://newmediaresearch.educ.monash.edu.au/lnmrg/article/academic-research-education-technology-and-media-mapping-field (date accessed July 7, 2014).

  • Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2012). Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: The role of sociological theory. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2013). Education in a digital world: Global perspectives on technology and education. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. (2007). Education and theory: Strangers in paradigms. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1993). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 18(3), 362–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. (2008). Reframing quality and impact: The place of theory in education research. Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Scott Bulfin Nicola F. Johnson Chris Bigum

Copyright information

© 2015 Scott Bulfin, Nicola F. Johnson, and Chris Bigum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, N.F. (2015). The Work of Theory in Ed-Tech Research. In: Bulfin, S., Johnson, N.F., Bigum, C. (eds) Critical Perspectives on Technology and Education. Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385451_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics