Skip to main content

The Nature of Paradoxes/the Natural Paradox

  • Chapter
Theorizing Outdoor Recreation and Ecology

Part of the book series: Leisure Studies in a Global Era ((LSGE))

  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

Paradoxes have appeared repeatedly throughout this work. In Chapter 2, I suggested that the knowledge produced through most of the twentieth century in OR followed the strictures of science and rationality. In so doing, paradoxes were relegated to a more minor position. Science privileges and produces knowledge that is factual, reliable, verifiable, and generalizable. Knowledge of this sort is difficult to reconcile with paradoxes because paradoxes are not necessarily factual, reliable, verifiable, or generalizable. It is much more difficult to make recommendations and policies based on paradoxical knowledge or conclusions. For these reasons, OR has engaged paradoxes from a modernist perspective that is inimical to the “logic” of paradoxes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Sean Ryan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ryan, S. (2015). The Nature of Paradoxes/the Natural Paradox. In: Theorizing Outdoor Recreation and Ecology. Leisure Studies in a Global Era. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385086_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics