Abstract
Paradoxes have appeared repeatedly throughout this work. In Chapter 2, I suggested that the knowledge produced through most of the twentieth century in OR followed the strictures of science and rationality. In so doing, paradoxes were relegated to a more minor position. Science privileges and produces knowledge that is factual, reliable, verifiable, and generalizable. Knowledge of this sort is difficult to reconcile with paradoxes because paradoxes are not necessarily factual, reliable, verifiable, or generalizable. It is much more difficult to make recommendations and policies based on paradoxical knowledge or conclusions. For these reasons, OR has engaged paradoxes from a modernist perspective that is inimical to the “logic” of paradoxes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Sean Ryan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ryan, S. (2015). The Nature of Paradoxes/the Natural Paradox. In: Theorizing Outdoor Recreation and Ecology. Leisure Studies in a Global Era. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385086_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385086_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57885-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38508-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)