Skip to main content

Abstract

The contribution of health policy research to both the theory and the practice of decentralization has been voluminous but often disappointing. This chapter argues that the challenge for health systems analysts is to adopt and use cat- egories from other social sciences, especially economics, political science, and comparative social policy, in a thoughtful way. Their concepts and analyses engage with fundamental issues of institutional design that explain the causes and consequences of decentralization in meaningful ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adolph, C, S. L. Lreer and E. Eassard da Fonseca (2012) ‘Allocation of Authority in European Health Policy’, Social Science and Medicine, 75, 1595–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arretche, M. (2009) ‘Continuidades E Descontinuidades Da Federaçào Brasileira: De Como 1988 Facilitou 1995’, DADOS — Revista de Ciências Sociai, 52(2), 377–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arretche, M. and E. Eonseca (2014) ‘Health System Decentralization in Brazil’, in G. Garchildon and T. Bossert (eds.), Federalism and Health Decentralization (Ottawa: Forum of Federations).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednar, J. (2009) The Robust Federation: Principles of Design (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beland, D. and A. Aecours (2008) Nationalism and Social Policy: The Politics of Territorial Solidarity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beny, C. R. (2009) Imperfect Union: Representation and Taxation in Multilevel Governments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, G., M. Maranikolos, J. Jxley E. Eolte, S. Sonnolly and N. May (2014) The Four Health Systems of the UK: How Do They Compare? (London: Nuffield Trust and the Health Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, T. (1998) ‘Analyzing the Decentralization of Health Systems in Developing Countries: Decision Space, Innovation and Performance’, Social Science and Medicine, 47, 1513–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F. G. (1999) ‘Decentralization and the Post-war Political Economy’, European Journal of Political Research,36, (1), 27–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Font, J. and A. Aico (2006) ‘Devolution and the Interregional Inequalities in Health and Healthcare in Spain’, Regional Studies, 40(8), 875–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costai Font, J. and S. L. Lreer (2013) Federalism and Decentralization in European Health a n d S od al Care. (B asingst oke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erk, J. and E. Eoning (2009) ‘New Structuralism and Institutional Change: Federalism between Centralization and Decentralization’, Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fargion, V. (2005) ‘From the Southern to the Northern Question: Territorial and Social Politics in Italy’, in N. McEwen and L. Moreno (eds.), The Territorial Politics of Welfare (London: Routledge), 127–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. and S. C. Chacker (2008) A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S. L. (2004) Territorial Politics and Health Policy: UK Health Policy in Comparative Perspective (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S. L. (ed.) (2006) Territory Democracy and justice: Regionalism and Federalism in Western Democracies (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S. L. (2009) ‘How Does Decentralisation Affect the Welfare State?’, journal of Social Policy, 39(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S. L. (2010) ‘Territorial Politics in Hard Times: The Welfare State Under Pressure in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(3), 405–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S. L. (2013) “The Rise and Fall of Tenitory in United Kingdom Health Services’, in J. Josta i Font and S. L. Greer (eds.), Federalism and Decentralization in European Health and Social Care (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S. L. and A. Arench (2010) ‘Intergovernmental Relations and Health in Great Britain after Devolution’, Policy and Politics, 38(4), 509–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. S. (2009) Going Local: Decentralization, Democratization, and the Promise of Good Governance (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S. B. (2006) Globalization and the Politics of Pay (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., G. Garks and A. Schäkel (2010) The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, E., C. Cagin and J. D. Stephens (1993) ‘Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State’, American journal of Sociology, 99(3), 711–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, E. and J. D. Dtephens (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. K. (2013) ‘Politiques de Santé: The Regional Centralization of French Health Policy’, in J. Josta i Font and S. L. Greer (eds.), Decentralization and Federalism in European Health and Social Care (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 208–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. K. and S. L. Lreer (2013)’ state Politics and the Creation of Health Insurance Exchanges’, American journal of Public Health, 103 (8), e8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levcovitz, E., L. Lima and C. Machado (2001) ‘Polftica de Saude nos Anos 90: Relaçôes Intergovernamentais e o Papel das Normas Operacionais Bâsicas’, Ciênc. Saude Colet, 6(2), 269–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, N. and L. Loreno (2005) The Territorial Politics of Welfare (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1999) ‘An Essay on Fiscal Federalism’, Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, V., M. Mevaux and L. Wei (2010) Health Systems Institutional Characteristics, Health Working Papers no. 50 (Paris: OECD).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peckham, S., M. Mxworthy, M. Mowell and I. Greener (2007) ‘Decentralizing Health Services in the UK: A New Conceptual Framework’, Public Administration, 86(2), 559–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. (1995) The Price of Federalism (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, J. A. (2004) ‘Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement’, Comparative Politics, 36(4), 481–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, J. A. (2005) Hamilton’s Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. A. (1983) Decentralization in Developing Countries, World Bank Staff Working Papers, no. 581 (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltman, R. B., V. Vankauskaite and K. Vrangbask (eds.) (2007) Decentralization in Health Care (Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, A. (1999) ‘Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model’, Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D. S. (2007) The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trench, A. (2007) Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (New York and Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation/Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallner, J. (2012) ‘Political Structures, Social Diversity, and Public Policy Comparing Mandatory Education in Canada and the United States’, Comparative Political Studies, 45(7), 850–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. R. (2009) ‘Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: The Implications of Fiscal Incentives’, Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 279–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, D. (2001) Decentralization in the Transition Economies: Challenges and the Road Ahead (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Scott L. Greer and Elize Massard da Fonseca

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greer, S.L., da Fonseca, E.M. (2015). Decentralization and Health System Governance. In: Kuhlmann, E., Blank, R.H., Bourgeault, I.L., Wendt, C. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Healthcare Policy and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137384935_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics