Abstract
This intervention addresses the rather mundane question of method — of how we go about identifying, exploring, analysing, tracing and politicizing assemblages. Certainly the ‘materialist turn’ has energized the scholarly landscape by allowing us to recognize the political in a radically expanded landscape of sites, scales and temporalities. It has displaced humans as the dominant agents of political change and placed us in intense and deeply embedded relations with the non-human things in our proximity, but also at a distance. But what research methods are adequate to such a radical expansion of our research landscape? With such a critical understanding of how knowledge itself is produced, is it even possible to speak in terms of ‘research methods’ anymore? Are we supposed to reimagine more traditional research methods such as ethnography, or develop new approaches that embrace wonder, surprise, intuition and experimentation? while many of these questions prompt grand ontological statements, I want to push the more mundane outworkings of materialist thought through a constant refrain of: ‘yes, but how?’
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Debbie Lisle
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lisle, D. (2014). Energizing the International. In: Acuto, M., Curtis, S. (eds) Reassembling International Theory. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383969_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383969_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48072-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38396-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)