Abstract
Close examination of how market capitalism has developed in Central Europe since 1990 reveals a striking paradox. On the one hand, highly ideological forces that emphasized removing every trace of government involvement in the name of individual initiative and liberalized exchanges propelled the initial wave of changes. On the other hand, the authorities quickly made moves intended to soften the devastating impact of the new economic rules, particularly that affecting employment and regional imbalances. Their efforts sometimes simply reflected a desire to preserve national sovereignty that led authorities to refuse to hand over certain state-run businesses. This early, deeply ideological vision of a completely market-driven economy was gradually replaced by a more regulated approach to market capitalism, in which fierce efforts to preserve national sovereignty were blended with the desire to restore local and regional equilibrium that were overturned in the early phases of the transformation. In other words, national sovereignty was in fact successfully reclaimed, as much as a means of pursuing highly market-driven economic policies as to ensure solidarity. In this sense, these new, previously Soviet-style states cleared their own unique European path to development and capitalism that combined free-market policies with protectionism while allocating a strong role to the state.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. P. Womack, D. T. Jones, and D. Roose, 1990, The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates.
Martin Myant, 2003, The Rise and Fall of Czech Capitalism: Economic Development in the Czech Republic since 1989, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Paul Aghion & Olivier Blanchard, 1998, “On privatization methods in Eastern Europe and their implications,” Economics of Transition, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 87–100
Marie Lavigne, 1999, The Economics of Transition. From Socialist Economy to Market Economy, Basingstoke: Macmillan
Mitchell A. Orenstein, 2000, Out of the Red. Building Capitalism and Democracy in Post-Communist Europe, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
François Bafoil, 2014, “Poland: A Systemic Transforming Process from State-Planned to Liberal Economy,” in The State’s Return to Business: The Global Financial Crisis, Neo-liberalism, and Government Linked Companies and Sustainable, Equitable Development, Edited by Edmund Terence Gomez, Francois Bafoil, and Cheong Kee Cheok, Routledge (forthcoming).
Claus Offe, 1997, Varieties of transition. The East European and East German Experience, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
François Bafoil, 2009, Central and Eastern Europe: Europeanization and Social Change, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, chap. 6
Gernot Grabher, 1995, “The Elegance of Incoherence: Economic Transformation in East Germany and Hungary,” in Eckard Dittrich, Gert Schmid, and R. Whitley (eds.), Industrial Transformation in Europe: Process and Context. London: Sage, pp. 33–54.
Dorothee Bohle and Bela Greskovits, “Capitalism Without Compromise: Strong Business and Weak Labor in Eastern Europe’s New Transnational Industries,” Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 41, no. 1, 2006, pp. 3–25.
Wolfgang Streeck and Philippe C. Schmitter, 1985, “Community, Market, State-and Associations? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order,” European Sociological Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 119–138
Gerhard Lehmbruch and Philippe C. Schmitter, 1982, Patterns of Corporatist Policy-making, London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Roger Hollingworth, Philiipe C. Schmitter, and Wolfgang Streeck, 1994, Governing Capitalist Economies: Performance and Control of Economic Sectors, New York: Oxford University Press.
Marc Morje Howard, 2003, The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolfgang Streeck, 2009, Reforming Capitalism. Institutional Change in the German Political Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, chapter 3.
Maria Lado, “Industrial Relations in the Candidate Countries,” European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Budapest: ILO, 2004
Annette Zimmer and Eckhart Priller (eds.), 2004, Future of Civil Society, Making Central European Nonprofit-Organizations Work. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Sylvie Contrepois, Violaine Delteil, Patrick Dieuaide and Steve Jefferys (eds), 2011, Globalizing Employment Relations, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Daniel Vaughan Whitehead, 2003, EU Enlargement versus Social Europe? The Uncertain Future of the European Social Model, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead (Ed.), Working Employment Conditions in New Members States, Geneva: ILO, 2005.
Myant, M., 2014, “Economies Undergoing Long Transition: Employment Relations in Central and Eastern Europe,” in A. Wilkinson, G. Wood, and R. Deeg, Oxford Handbook of Employment Relations: Comparative Employment Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 359–384.
Juliusz Gardawski et al., 2010, Working Poles and the Crisis of Fordism, Warsaw: Scholar.
Ekiert, Georg, and Jan Kubik, 1998, “Contentious Politics in New Democracies. East Germany, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, 1989–1993,” World Politics, no. 50, July, pp. 547–581.
St é phane Portet, 2005, “Poland: Circumventing the law or fully deregulating?” in Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead (ed.), Working Employment Conditions in New Members States, Geneva: ILO, pp. 273–337.
Marie Plessz, 2010, “Les ouvriers en Europe Centrale: la dissolution d’une catégorie sociale dans les statistiques,” Sociologie du travail, no. 52, pp. 340–358;
D. Kideckel, 2001, “Winning the Battles, Losing the War: Contradictions of Romanian Labor in the Postcommunist Transformation,” in Stephen Crowley and David Ost, Workers after Workers’ States. Labor and Politics in Postcommunist Eastern Europe, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 97–12
Stephen Crowley, 2004, “Explaining Labor Weakness in Post-Communist Europe: Historical Legacies and Comparative Perspective,” East European Politics and Societies, vol. 18, no 3, pp. 394–429
Juliusz Gardawski, Jerzy Bartkowski, Jacek Mecina, and Jan Czarrzasrty, 2010, Working Poles and the crisis of Fordism, Warsaw: Scholar.
François Bafoil, 2000, “La classe ouvri è re post-communiste. Des ‘héros au pouvoir’ à l’exclusion des ‘petites gens’,” Genèses, no. 37, pp. 74–97.
OECD, 2007, Competitive Regional Clusters. National Policy Approaches, OCDE Publishing: Paris
OECD, 2008, Poland, Territorial Review, OECD Publishing: Paris.
Petr Pavlinek, 2006, “Restructuring of the Polish Passenger Car Industry through Foreign Direct Investment,” Euroasian Geography and Economics, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 353–377.
Petr Pavlinek, “Regional Development Implications of Foreign Direct Investments in Central Europe,” European Urban and Regional Studies, 2004, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 47–70.
Bruno Dallago, Ishiro Iwasaki (eds), 2007, Corporate Restructuring and Governence in Transition Economies, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Marie Lavigne, 1999, The Economics of Transition. From Socialist Economy to Market Economy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
John S. Earle and Saul Estrin, “Employee Ownership in Transition,” in Roman Frydman, Cheryl W. Gray, and Andrzej Rapaczynski (eds.), 1996, Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia, Volume 2: Insiders and the State. Budapest: Central European University Press; François Bafoil, “Poland: A Systemic Transforming Process from State-planned to Liberal Economy,” in Edmund T. Gomez, François Bafoil and Kee-Cheok Cheong (eds.), 2014, Government Linked Companies and Sustainable, Equitable Development, Routledge: Abingdon, 2014.
Regarding Eastern Europe, see Tom Gallagher, 2009, Romania and the European Union How the Weak Vanquished the Strong, Manchester: Manchester University Press. Regarding the comparison between the two regions
see François Bafoil, 2013, Resilient states in a comparative perspective, World Scientific Publishing, chapter 6.
Copyright information
© 2014 François Bafoil
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bafoil, F. (2014). Industrial Companies and Territories: The Reform Process in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Emerging Capitalism in Central Europe and Southeast Asia. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383068_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383068_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48032-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38306-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)