Abstract
This chapter focuses on the least-developed form of political capitalism in the Mekong region, a form specific to extremely underdeveloped countries such as Cambodia. The term political capitalism is used to describe the economic situation in countries dominated by authoritarian, if not dictatorial, political groups that are customers of the zone’s big bosses,1 who exert a significant influence over a narrow range of economic sectors, without, however, having an adequate number of SOEs to allow for initial development (such as the import substitution industrialization that occurred in North and Southeast Asia). This lack of SOEs—Cambodia is deemed to have less than 20 SOEs—forced Khmer authorities to open their economy as much as possible.2 This is why, to ensure increased levels of development, extremely underdeveloped countries such as Cambodia tend to implement far-reaching deregulation policies that include the creation of special economic zones. Regional membership in ASEAN3 is essential for these countries to achieve their development objectives. Membership not only allows them to benefit from the organization’s protection, which essentially guarantees impunity in an environment of essentially nonexistent labor regulations, but also to benefit from aid and member-state investment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
“Big bosses” refer to China and the United States, although this notion of “bosses” of Cambodia and similarly of Laos refers historically—beyond the French colonial occupiers—to the Thais and Vietnamese and further back to the Chinese. Regarding Cambodia, see David Chandler, 1983, The History of Cambodia, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Regarding Laos, see Evans Grant, 2002, A Short History of Laos: The Land in Between, Melbourne: Allen & Unwin.
Regarding the Chinese “bosses” in Laos, see Martin Stuart-Fox, 2009, “Laos: The Chinese connection,” Southeast Asian Affairs, pp. 141–169.
Hal Hill, Jayant Menon, 2013, “Cambodia: Rapid Growth with Weak Institutions,” Asian Economic Policy Review, no. 8, pp. 46–65.
François Bafoil, 2014, “Etat prébendier, libé ralisationé conomiqueetdé veloppementrégional faiblement intégré. Leszonesé conomiques spéciales au Cambodge,” Critique Internationale, no. 65, October–December.
Sophal Ear, 2011, “Growth in the Rice and Garment Sectors,” in Caroline Hughes and Kheang Un (eds), Cambodia’s Economic Transformation, Copenhagen: NIAS, pp. 70–93.
Michiel Verver and Heidi Dahles, 2014, “The Institutionalisation of Oknha: Cambodian Entrepreneurship at the Interface of Business and Politics,” Journal of Contemporary Asia. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2014.891147 (Accessed on June 5, 2014).
It is unclear where bribes begin and formal payments end because so much is left to the discretion of individuals who have bid for their government post and form only a small part of an overall pyramid of payments.” Sophal Ear, 2011, “Growth in the Rice and Garment sectors,” in Caroline Hughes and Kheang Un (eds.), Cambodia’s Economic Transformation, Copenhagen: NIAS, pp. 70–93 ( 80 ).
Sobunthoeun So, 2011, “The Politics and Practice of Land Registration at the Grass Roots Level in Cambodia,” in Caroline Hughes and Kheang Un (eds.), Cambodia’s Economic Transformation.
This historically very important sector remains insignificant today following the privatization of the seven large, state-owned plantations and the elimination of 17,000 of the 21,000 employees who worked in the sector in 1993. Wages are very low (a report in 2001 found wages of US$35–40 per month plus 44 kilograms of rice, with family wages ranging from US$55–72 per month); the work day is ten hours, and tools are unsophisticated. Margaret Slocomb, 2011, “The Privatization of Cambodia’s Rubber Industry,” in Caroline Hughes and Kheang Un (eds.), Cambodia’s Economic Transformation, pp. 94–109.
David Chandler, 1983, The History of Cambodia, Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Evans Gottesman, 2004, Cambodia, after the Khmer Rouge. Inside the Politics of Nation Building, Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books
Lucian Pye, 1985, Asian Power and Politics. The Cultural Dimension of Authority, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University
Rigg Jonathan, 2003, Southeast Asia. The Human Landscape of Modernization and Development, 2nd edition, New York: Routledge.
Fau Nathalie, Khonthapane Sirivanh, Christian Taillard, 2014, Transnational Dynamics in Southeast Asia, the Greater Mekong Subregion and Malacca Straits Economic Corridors ISEAS Publishing
Ishida, M. 2005, “Effectiveness and Challenges of the Three Economic Corridors of the Greater Mekong Sub-region,” Institute of Developing Economies, Discussion Paper No. 35. Available online at http://www.ide-jetro.jp/English/Publish/Download/Dp/pdf/035.pdf (Last accessed in November 26, 2013). See ADB, 2007, “Special Economic Zones and Competitiveness,” PRM Policy Note Series Review Committee, Manila. Than, M., 1997, “Economic Co-operation in the Greater Mekong Subregion,” Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 40–57.
Thein Swe and Paul Chambers, 2011, Cashing in Across the Golden Triangle: Thailand’s Northern Border Trade with China, Laos, and Myanmar, Chiang Mai: Mekong Press, p. 39.
See also Pal Nyiri, 2012, “Enclaves of Improvement: Sovereignty and Developmentalism in the Special Zones of the China-Lao Borderlands,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 54, no 3, pp. 533–562.
Barry Naughton, 2009, The Chinese Economy. Transition and Growth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shenzhen Government Online, 2011, Favorable Policies, available online at: http://english.sz.gov.cn/iis/200509/t20050930_1092468.htm. Last accessed April 2011.
Shenzhen Government Online, 2011, Investment Environment Overview, available online at: http://english.sz.gov.cn/iis/iis1/. (Accessed in April 2011).
Pasuk Phongpaichit and Chris Baker, 2009 (2nd ed.), Thaksin, Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
Marie Claire Bergère, 2012, Chine. Le nouveau capitalisme d’Etat, Paris: Fayard.
Mark Beeson, 2007, Regionalism and Globalization in East Asia. Politics, Security and Economic Development, New York: Palgrave.
M. Sullivan, 2011, “China’s Aid to Cambodia,” in Caroline Hugues and Kheang Un (ed.), Cambodia’s Economic Transformation.
M. Gainsborough, 2012, “Elites vs. Reform in Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam,” Journal of Democracy, April, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 34–46.
Copyright information
© 2014 François Bafoil
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bafoil, F. (2014). Cambodia: Political Capitalism and the Prebendal State. In: Emerging Capitalism in Central Europe and Southeast Asia. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383068_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383068_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48032-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38306-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)