Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the least-developed form of political capitalism in the Mekong region, a form specific to extremely underdeveloped countries such as Cambodia. The term political capitalism is used to describe the economic situation in countries dominated by authoritarian, if not dictatorial, political groups that are customers of the zone’s big bosses,1 who exert a significant influence over a narrow range of economic sectors, without, however, having an adequate number of SOEs to allow for initial development (such as the import substitution industrialization that occurred in North and Southeast Asia). This lack of SOEs—Cambodia is deemed to have less than 20 SOEs—forced Khmer authorities to open their economy as much as possible.2 This is why, to ensure increased levels of development, extremely underdeveloped countries such as Cambodia tend to implement far-reaching deregulation policies that include the creation of special economic zones. Regional membership in ASEAN3 is essential for these countries to achieve their development objectives. Membership not only allows them to benefit from the organization’s protection, which essentially guarantees impunity in an environment of essentially nonexistent labor regulations, but also to benefit from aid and member-state investment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. “Big bosses” refer to China and the United States, although this notion of “bosses” of Cambodia and similarly of Laos refers historically—beyond the French colonial occupiers—to the Thais and Vietnamese and further back to the Chinese. Regarding Cambodia, see David Chandler, 1983, The History of Cambodia, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Regarding Laos, see Evans Grant, 2002, A Short History of Laos: The Land in Between, Melbourne: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Regarding the Chinese “bosses” in Laos, see Martin Stuart-Fox, 2009, “Laos: The Chinese connection,” Southeast Asian Affairs, pp. 141–169.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hal Hill, Jayant Menon, 2013, “Cambodia: Rapid Growth with Weak Institutions,” Asian Economic Policy Review, no. 8, pp. 46–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. François Bafoil, 2014, “Etat prébendier, libé ralisationé conomiqueetdé veloppementrégional faiblement intégré. Leszonesé conomiques spéciales au Cambodge,” Critique Internationale, no. 65, October–December.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sophal Ear, 2011, “Growth in the Rice and Garment Sectors,” in Caroline Hughes and Kheang Un (eds), Cambodia’s Economic Transformation, Copenhagen: NIAS, pp. 70–93.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Michiel Verver and Heidi Dahles, 2014, “The Institutionalisation of Oknha: Cambodian Entrepreneurship at the Interface of Business and Politics,” Journal of Contemporary Asia. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2014.891147 (Accessed on June 5, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. It is unclear where bribes begin and formal payments end because so much is left to the discretion of individuals who have bid for their government post and form only a small part of an overall pyramid of payments.” Sophal Ear, 2011, “Growth in the Rice and Garment sectors,” in Caroline Hughes and Kheang Un (eds.), Cambodia’s Economic Transformation, Copenhagen: NIAS, pp. 70–93 ( 80 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sobunthoeun So, 2011, “The Politics and Practice of Land Registration at the Grass Roots Level in Cambodia,” in Caroline Hughes and Kheang Un (eds.), Cambodia’s Economic Transformation.

    Google Scholar 

  10. This historically very important sector remains insignificant today following the privatization of the seven large, state-owned plantations and the elimination of 17,000 of the 21,000 employees who worked in the sector in 1993. Wages are very low (a report in 2001 found wages of US$35–40 per month plus 44 kilograms of rice, with family wages ranging from US$55–72 per month); the work day is ten hours, and tools are unsophisticated. Margaret Slocomb, 2011, “The Privatization of Cambodia’s Rubber Industry,” in Caroline Hughes and Kheang Un (eds.), Cambodia’s Economic Transformation, pp. 94–109.

    Google Scholar 

  11. David Chandler, 1983, The History of Cambodia, Boulder, CO: Westview Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Evans Gottesman, 2004, Cambodia, after the Khmer Rouge. Inside the Politics of Nation Building, Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lucian Pye, 1985, Asian Power and Politics. The Cultural Dimension of Authority, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rigg Jonathan, 2003, Southeast Asia. The Human Landscape of Modernization and Development, 2nd edition, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fau Nathalie, Khonthapane Sirivanh, Christian Taillard, 2014, Transnational Dynamics in Southeast Asia, the Greater Mekong Subregion and Malacca Straits Economic Corridors ISEAS Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ishida, M. 2005, “Effectiveness and Challenges of the Three Economic Corridors of the Greater Mekong Sub-region,” Institute of Developing Economies, Discussion Paper No. 35. Available online at http://www.ide-jetro.jp/English/Publish/Download/Dp/pdf/035.pdf (Last accessed in November 26, 2013). See ADB, 2007, “Special Economic Zones and Competitiveness,” PRM Policy Note Series Review Committee, Manila. Than, M., 1997, “Economic Co-operation in the Greater Mekong Subregion,” Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thein Swe and Paul Chambers, 2011, Cashing in Across the Golden Triangle: Thailand’s Northern Border Trade with China, Laos, and Myanmar, Chiang Mai: Mekong Press, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See also Pal Nyiri, 2012, “Enclaves of Improvement: Sovereignty and Developmentalism in the Special Zones of the China-Lao Borderlands,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 54, no 3, pp. 533–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barry Naughton, 2009, The Chinese Economy. Transition and Growth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shenzhen Government Online, 2011, Favorable Policies, available online at: http://english.sz.gov.cn/iis/200509/t20050930_1092468.htm. Last accessed April 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shenzhen Government Online, 2011, Investment Environment Overview, available online at: http://english.sz.gov.cn/iis/iis1/. (Accessed in April 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pasuk Phongpaichit and Chris Baker, 2009 (2nd ed.), Thaksin, Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marie Claire Bergère, 2012, Chine. Le nouveau capitalisme d’Etat, Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mark Beeson, 2007, Regionalism and Globalization in East Asia. Politics, Security and Economic Development, New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Sullivan, 2011, “China’s Aid to Cambodia,” in Caroline Hugues and Kheang Un (ed.), Cambodia’s Economic Transformation.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Gainsborough, 2012, “Elites vs. Reform in Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam,” Journal of Democracy, April, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 François Bafoil

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bafoil, F. (2014). Cambodia: Political Capitalism and the Prebendal State. In: Emerging Capitalism in Central Europe and Southeast Asia. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383068_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics