Abstract
States are not only sovereign entities. They are also political communities that exercise power in the name of the people that constitute them. These constituted communities claim legitimacy on the grounds that their members authorise them to exercise political power on their behalf. As legitimate political communities, states claim to have a moral right to se If-definition, which entitles them to maintain control over membership policies. In this chapter I analyse claims to self-definition advanced by political communities and by ethno-cultural communities and test the compatibility between these claims and the practice of ethno-cultural citizenship. Obviously, in the real world we cannot distinguish between pure political communities and pure ethno-cultural communities and arguments about self-definition often refer to both types of communities. I, nevertheless, think that it is useful to start the examination of various claims to self-definition by posing the question of what kind of “self” these claims are intended to serve.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Costica Dumbrava
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dumbrava, C. (2014). A Right to Self-Definition. In: Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-Cultural Belonging. Palgrave Studies in Citizenship Transitions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137382085_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137382085_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47988-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38208-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)