Skip to main content
  • 147 Accesses

Abstract

When I received the invitation to participate in the workshop that led to this book, I was struck by the question mark following the phrase “customized science”. As a student and teacher of the history of science, and an empiricist, naturalist, and feminist philosopher of science, I thought “When is science not customized?” Indeed, I asked “Is a science that is not customized even possible?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, E. (2004) ‘Uses of Value Judgments in Feminist Social Science: A Case Study of Research on Divorce’, Hypatia, 19, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barash, D. (1977) Sociobiology and behavior (New York: Elsevier North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. (1999) Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind (Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1990) The Selfish Gene, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1996) Darwin’s Dangerous Idea (New York: Simon and Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P. (1908) The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (Paris: Chevalier et Riviere).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1985) Vaulting Ambition (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (2008) ‘Science, Religion, and Democracy’, Episteme, 5, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1869) The Subjection of Women (London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. H. (1993) ‘A Question of Evidence’, Hypatia, 8, 172–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. H. (2003) ‘The Descent of Evolutionary Explanations: Darwinian Vestiges in the Social Sciences’, in Roth, P. and Turner, S. (eds) The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Social Science, pp. 258–90 (Oxford: Blackwell Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. H. and Nelson, J. (2001) On Quine (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. (1953) From a Logical Point of View, 2nd revised ed. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2006) Darwinism and its Discontents (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Lynn Hankinson Nelson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, L.H. (2014). Feminism and Science. In: Fuller, S., Stenmark, M., Zackariasson, U. (eds) The Customization of Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137379610_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics