Abstract
The concept of reflexivity is central to research that aspires to interpret and reconstruct global, comparative and transnational dimensions of crime and its control. It is crucial for understanding how and why criminal justice policies travel between contexts and for interrogating the motives and the interests of the agents and the institutions which facilitate these ‘policy transfers’ Qones and Newburn 2007). Reflexivity in the context of global criminology can be understood as the idea that ‘[t]here is no one-way street between the researcher and the object of study; rather, the two affect each other mutually and continually in the course of the research process’ (Alvesson and Sköldberg 2009, 79). The reflexive praxis described by Alvesson and Sköldberg (2009) holds important methodological implications for criminologists who are interested in studying globalisation ‘as an interactive rather than a hegemonic process’ (Cain 2000), in other words, a process that is continuously shaped by local and global forces. The concept is therefore crucial for understanding how globalisation facilitates the diffusion of ‘Western’ mentalities of crime and punishment throughout the Global South (see Chan 2005) and it provides a vehicle for working towards the actualisation of what Bowling (2011, 374 original emphasis) describes as ‘a criminology of harm production emphasizing the role of the discipline in documenting the harms produced by global crime control practices and the role of criminologists in speaking truth to power…’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alvesson, M. and Sköldberg, K. (2009) Reflexive Methodology, London: Sage.
Blaustein, J. (2014) ‘The Space Between: Negotiating the Contours of Nodal Security Governance through “Safer Communities” in Bosnia-Herzegovina’ Policing and Society 24(1): 44–62.
Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bowling, B. (2011) ‘Transnational Criminology and the Globalization of Harm Production’. In C. Hoyle and M. Bosworth (eds) What Is Criminology? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.361–80.
Cain, M. (2000) ‘Orientalism, Occidentalism and the Sociology of Crime’ British Journal of Criminology 40(2): 239–60.
Chan, J. (2005) ‘Globalisation, Reflexivity and the Practice of Criminology’. In J. Sheptycki and A. Wardak (eds) Transnational & Comparative Criminology, Abingdon: Glasshouse Press, pp.337–57.
Cohen, S. (1988) ‘Western Crime-Control Models’. In S. Cohen (ed.) Against Criminology, New Brunswick: Transaction Books, pp. 172–202.
Crawford, A. (2009) Crime Prevention Policies in Comparative Perspective, Cullompton: Willan.
Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (1996) ‘Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature’ Political Studies XLIV: 343–57.
Elias, N. (2000) The Civilizing Process, London: Blackwell.
Ellison, G. and Pino, N. (2012) Globalization, Police Reform and Development, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Hills, A., Neyroud, P., and Sheptycki, J. (2013) ‘Experimental Criminology and Evi den ce-based Policing: The Future of Democratically Responsive Policing in the Global South?’ At the European Society of Criminology Conference, September 2013, Budapest, Hungary.
Jones, T. and Newburn, T. (2007) Policy Transfer and Criminal Justice, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Lendvai, N. and Stubbs, P. (2009) ‘Assemblages, Translation and Intermediaries in South East Europe’European Societies 11(5): 673–95.
Nelken, D. (2009) ‘Comparative Criminal Justice: Beyond Ethnocentrism and Relativism’ European Journal of Criminology 6(4): 291–311.
Ryan, B. (2011) Statebuilding and Police Reform: The Freedom of Security, Abingdon: Routledge.
UNDP (2011) Rratki Pregled Politika: Partnerstvo za Signurnije Zajednice Grada Sarajevo. Sarajevo.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Jarrett Blaustein
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blaustein, J. (2014). Reflexivity and Participatory Policy Ethnography: Situating the Self in a Transnational Criminology of Harm Production. In: Lumsden, K., Winter, A. (eds) Reflexivity in Criminological Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137379405_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137379405_23
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47874-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37940-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)