Skip to main content

Researching ‘Hidden Populations’: Reflections of a Quantitative Researcher in Understanding ‘Established’ and ‘Immigrant’ Groups’ Perceptions of Crime and Social (Dis)Order

  • Chapter

Abstract

Re flexivity is often considered a ‘vital counterpoint… to the positivist, quan- titative agenda’ Qewkes 2012, 69). The aim of this chapter however is to provide a critical and reflexive account of a quantitative research project, that used supplementary qualitative methods, in order to demonstrate the value of reflexivity in quantitative and mixed methods research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Birman, D. (2006) ‘Ethical Issues in Research with Immigrants and Refugees’. In J.E. Trimble and C.B. Fisher (eds) The Handbook of Ethical Research with Ethnocultural Populations and Communities, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.155–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, J. (1992) ‘Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: An Overview’. In J. Brannen, (ed.) Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, pp.3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J.D. (2000) Ethnography, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahinden, J. and Efionayi-Mäder, D. (2009) ‘Challenges and Strategies in Empirical Fieldwork with Asylum Seekers and Migrant Sex Workers’. In I. Van Liempt and V. Bilger (eds) The Ethics of Migration Research Methodology: Dealing with Vulnerable Immigrants, Eastbourne, UK, Sussex Academic Press, pp.98-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. and Francis, P. (2011) ‘Reflecting on Criminological Research’. In P. Davies, P. Francis and V. Jupp (eds) Doing Criminological Research, 2nd edn, London: Sage, pp.281-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, J. and Spencer, J. (2011) ‘Sensitive Survey Research: An Oxymoron?’ In P. Davies, P. Francis and V. Jupp (eds) Doing Criminological Research, 2nd edn, London: Sage, pp.139-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, F. and Heath, S. (1999) Sociological Research Methods in Context, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. and Scotson, J.L. (1965) The Established andThe Outsiders: A Sociological Enquiry into Community Problems, London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faugier, J. and Sargeant, M. (1997) ‘Sampling Hard to Reach Populations’ Journal of Advanced Nursing 26: 790–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, L. (2002) ‘Negotiating the Swamp: The Opportunity and Challenge of Reflex-ivity in Research Practice’ Qualitative Research 2(2): 209–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, C. (2013) ‘Living with Aliens’ Criminal Justice Matters 93(1): 26–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley M. and Atkinson, P. (2007) Ethnography: Principles in Practice, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, L. (2000) ‘Going Around the Houses: Researching in High Crime Communities’. In R.D. King and E. Wincup (eds) Doing Research on Crime and Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.373–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, L. (2001) Community, Crime and Disorder: Safety and Regeneration in Urban Neighbourhoods, Basingstoke: Pal grave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D.D. (1997) ‘Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden Populations’ Social Problems 44(2): 174–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, R. (1997) ‘Introduction: Reflexivity and Voice’. In R. Hertz (eds) Reflexivity and Voice, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. vii-xviii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J.H.P. (2003) ‘New Sampling Designs and the Quality of Data’. In A. Ferligoj and A. Mrvar (eds) Developments in Applied Statistics, FDV, Methodoloski zvezki, Ljubljana, pp.205-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, J. (2000) ‘Negotiating Danger in Fieldwork on Crime: A Researcher’s Tale’. In G. Lee-Treweek and S. Linkogle (eds) Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research, London: Routledge, pp.61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Y. (2012) ‘Autoethnography and Emotion as Intellectual Resources: Doing Prison Research Differently’ Qualitative Inquiry 18(1): 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, E.A., Stringfield, S. andTeddlie, C. (2003) ‘Mixed Methods Sampling Strategies in Social Science Research’. In A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.273–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Treweek, G. and Linkogle, S. (2000) ‘Putting Danger in the Frame’. In G. Lee-Treweek and S. Linkogle (eds) Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research, London: Routledge, pp.8–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, R. and Lee, M.T. (2000) ‘On Immigration and Crime’ Criminal Justice 1: 485–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naples, N.A. (1997) ‘A Feminist Revisiting of the Insider/Outsider Debate: The “Outsider Phenomenon” in Rural Iowa’. In R. Hertz (eds) Reflexivity and Voice, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.70–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P. (2003) The Student’s Guide to Research Ethics, Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. and Bowling, B. (2003) ‘Racism, Ethnicity and Criminology: Developing Minority Perspectives’ British Journal of Criminology 43: 269–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J. (2009) ‘Disparity and Diversity in the Contemporary City: Social (Dis)order Revisited’ The British Journal of Sociology 60(1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J. (2012) Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, J.E. (1992) Planning Ethically Responsible Research: A Guide for Students and Internal Review Boards, Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W.G. (1990) Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Neighbourhoods, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steier, F. (1991) Research and Reflexivity, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G.D. (1968) The Social Order of the Slum: Ethnicity and Territory in the Inner City, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W.I. and Znaniecki, R [1918–1920] (1996) The Polish Peasant in Europe and America: A Classic Work in Immigration History. Edited by Eli Zaretsky, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, J.K. and Biernacki, P. (1989) ‘Targeted Sampling: Options for the Study of Hidden Populations’ Social Problems 36(4): 416–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Clare E. Griffiths

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Griffiths, C.E. (2014). Researching ‘Hidden Populations’: Reflections of a Quantitative Researcher in Understanding ‘Established’ and ‘Immigrant’ Groups’ Perceptions of Crime and Social (Dis)Order. In: Lumsden, K., Winter, A. (eds) Reflexivity in Criminological Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137379405_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics