Abstract
The discussion so far suggests that IFC represented an era of recovery and restoration of the credibility for the economies of the Ottoman Empire, Egypt, Serbia and Greece as evidenced by recovery of cost of borrowing, bond spreads and access to international markets. Moreover, I examined the turning points in the history of sovereign risk of each country and highlighted the role of political, monetary, institutional and other factors in explaining the historical trends. However, so far I have not dealt with the mechanisms through which IFC led to a decline in the sovereign risk nor have I attempted to explain the differences in the degree of recovery and success among the cases. This chapter provides a comparative picture of the political and fiscal institutions of the Ottoman Empire, Egypt, Greece and Serbia before 1914 and puts forward a framework to interpret the different ways that IFC functioned in each case.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Ali Coşkun Tunçer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tunçer, A.C. (2015). Resistance vs Cooperation: Political Economy of International Financial Control. In: Sovereign Debt and International Financial Control. Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378545_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378545_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57302-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37854-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)