Skip to main content

The EU-US Management of Nuclear Proliferation in the 21st Century: How Strategic a Strategic Partnership?

  • Chapter
  • 248 Accesses

Part of the book series: The European Union in International Affairs ((EUIA))

Abstract

The nuclear non-proliferation policies of the United States and the European Union (EU) have converged and diverged since 1991, particularly with respect to the assessment of the nature of the threat posed by nuclear proliferation, the preferred methods for supporting the nonproliferation regimes and sanctioning deviants, and the solutions to mitigating or reversing nuclear proliferation. The pace and threat of nuclear proliferation accelerated after 1991. The United States undertook an aggressive and anticipatory set of policies designed to reverse the expansion of the number of nuclear weapons states attending the dissolution of the Soviet Union, to secure Soviet-era nuclear weapons and weapons-grade materiel, and to strengthen the nuclear non-proliferation regime over the long-term. The EU largely lacked a common non-proliferation strategy in the 1990s (van Ham 2011), although it played a critical role in redressing the environmental security threat posed by the design flaws of Soviet-era nuclear reactors and dilapidated nuclear power infrastructures in the FSU (former Soviet Union) and central and eastern Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anthony, I. and Grip, L. (2013) ‘Strengthening the European Union’s Future Approach to WMD Non-Proliferation’, SIPRI Policy Paper 37 (Stockholm: SIPRI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, S. (2005) ‘Enhancing Export Control-related CTR (Cooperative Threat Reduction) Programmes: Options for the EU’, Background Paper 6 (Stockholm: SIPRI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, C. (2002) ‘Nuclear Nonproliferation Issues’, CRS Issue Brief for Congress IB 10091, (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service (CRS)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. (2013) United Nations System Funding: Congressional Issues, CRS RL 33611 (Washington, DC: CRS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Global Security and Health (2002) ‘Reducing the Threat of Nuclear Terrorism: Cooperative Threat Reduction Programs in the Department of Defense’, Issue Brief, August, http://action.psr.org/documents/dod_brief.pdf.

  • Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (2006) National Military Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction (Washington, DC: Department of Defense).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, W. (1998) ‘United States/European Declaration on Common Orientation of Non-Proliferation Policy’, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, 05114187, 34:21 (25 May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2003) Fight against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, 15708/03, 10 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2005) EU-U.S. Declaration on Enhancing Cooperation in the Field of Non Proliferation and the Fight Against Terrorism, Washington, 20 June, 10306/05 (Presse 160).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2006) EU Strategy against the Proliferation of WMD: Monitoring and Enhancing Consistent Implementation, 16694/06, 12 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2007), Council Regulation (EURATOM) No 300/2007 of 19 February 2007 Establishing an Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation, OJ L8/1–10, 22 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2010) ‘Council Decision 2010/799/CFSP of 13 December 2010 in Support of a Process of Confidence-building Leading to the Establishment of a Zone Free of Weapons of Mass Destruction and their Means of Delivery in the Middle East in Support of the Implementation of the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction’, OJ L341/27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2014) Phare Programme, http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/enlargement/2004_and_2007_enlargement/e50004_en.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency (2010) Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Estimate Cooperative Threat Reduction Program (Washington, DC: DTRA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency (2013) Nunn-Lugar CTR Scorecard, at: http://www.dtra.mil/Missions/Nunn-Lugar/scorecards.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, V. (2001), General Report: Safeguarding the Nuclear Complex in Russia and the New Independent States (Brussels: NATO Parliamentary Assembly).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Implementation of the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation. Second Report—Annual Action Programmes for 2010 and 2011, COOM(2012) 771 final, 18 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013) Commission Staff Working Document. 2012 Annual Report on the Instrument for Stability (Annex II), SWD(2013) 292 final, 26 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council (2003) A Secure Europe in a Better World: The European Security Strategy, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • European External Action Service (2009), Annex 3: Declaration on Non-Proliferation and Disarmament, http://eeas.europa.eu/us/sum11_09/docs/nonprolif_en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2013) CBRN Centres of Excellence: An Initiative of the European Union, http://www.cbrn-coe.eu/AboutCoE.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Partnership Working Group (2012) GPWG Annual Report. Consolidated Report Data 2012: Annex, Washington, DC: US Department of State, http://nnsa.energy.gov/aboutus/ourprograms/dnn/fmd/heu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grip, L. (2011) ‘Mapping the European Union’s Institutional Actors Related to WMD Non-proliferation’, Non-proliferation Papers, no. 1, EU Non-proliferation Consortium, May, http://www.sipri.org/research/disarmament/euconsortium/publications/EUNPC_nol.pdf.

  • IAEA (2003) IAEA Illicit Trafficking Database, http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/features/radsources/pdf/itdb_31122003.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2013) IAEA Incident and Trafficking Database (ITDB), http://www-ns.iaea.org/security/itdb.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maerli, M., Fedchenko, V. and Anthony, I. (2005) Nuclear Security: Reinforcing EU Cooperative Threat Reduction Programmes, Background Paper 2 (Stockholm: SIPRI).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Nuclear Safety Administration (2013a), ‘Global Threat Reduction Initiative’, http://nnsa.energy.gov/aboutus/ourprograms/dnn/gtri.

  • National Nuclear Security Administration (2013b) ‘U.S.-Russia Partnership, Final Shipment of Fuel Converted From 20,000 Russian Nuclear Warheads Arrives in United States and Will Be Used for U.S. Electricity’, Press Release, 11 December, http://nnsa.energy.gov/mediaroom/pressreleases/megatonstomegawatts.

  • NATO (1999) The Alliance’s Strategic Concept (Brussels: NATO).

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO (2006) Comprehensive Political Guidance, 29 November, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_56425.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO (2009) NATO’s Comprehensive, Strategic-Level Policy for Preventing the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and Defending Against Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Threats (Brussels: NATO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitkin, M. (2011) ‘Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI)’, CRS Report for Congress, RL31957 (Washington, DC: CRS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitkin, M. and Woolf, A. (2013) The Evolution of Cooperative Threat Reduction: Issues for Congress, CRS R43143, Washington, DC: CRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolin, P. (2004), 168 STC 04 Rev.1—Nuclear Weapons Proliferation (Brussels: NATO Parliamentary Assembly).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolin, P. (2005), 178 STC 05 E—The Security of WMD Related Material in Russia (Brussels: NATO Parliamentary Assembly).

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Director of National Intelligence (2012) FY 2013 Congressional Budget Justification: National Intelligence Program Summary, http://apps.washington-post.com/g/page/national/inside-the-2013-us-intelligence-black-budget/420/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polenz, R. (2004) The EU Security Concept—Implications for NATO and the EU. 167 PCTR 04 E bis, 30 September (Brussels: NATO Parliamentary Assembly).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riera, T. (2003), 155 STC 03 E—Non-proliferation in the 21st Century: A Transatlantic Agenda (Brussels: NATO Parliamentary Assembly).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, J. and Kirchner, E. (1997) Recasting the European Order: Security Architectures and Economic Cooperation (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.K. Department of Energy and Climate Change (2010) Global Threat Reduction Programme, Eighth Annual Report 2010, decc.gov.uk/gtrp.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSC (2004), Resolution 1540 (2004) S/RES/1540 (2004), at: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1540%20 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Defense (2010), Nuclear Posture Review Report (Washington, DC: Department of Defense).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Defense (annual) Cooperative Threat Reduction. Annual Report to the Congress, Fiscal Year [2006, 2007, 2009 & 2012] (Washington, DC : US Department of Defense).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Energy (2013) The Four Year Effort and the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, http://nnsa.energy.gov/sites/default/files/nnsa/12–13-inlinefiles/2013–12-12%204%20Year%20Effort.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Energy (annual) FY (2005–2012] Congressional Budget Request. BudgetHighlights (Washington, DC: USDOE).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of State (2006) Export Control and Related Border Security Program: Strategic Plan, (Washington, DC: USDOS).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Government Accountability Office (2011) Nuclear Nonproliferation: Action Needed to Address NNSA’s Program Management and Coordination Challenges, GAO-12–71, December (Washington, DC: GAO).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Government Accountability Office (2012) Combatting Nuclear Smuggling: Megaports Initiative Faces Funding and Sustainability Challenges, GAO-13–37, (Washington, DC: GAO).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Senate (2013) Next Generation Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 2013, 113th Congress, 1st Session, DAV13455.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ham, P. (2011) ‘The European Union’s WMD Strategy and the CFSP: A Critical Analysis’, Non-Proliferation Papers No. 2, EU-Non Proliferation Consortium, http://www.nonproliferation.eu.

  • Waltz, K. (1981) ‘The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Better’, Adelphi Papers, Number 171, (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • White House (2002a) National Security Strategy (Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • White House (2002b) National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House (2006) Announcing the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism: Joint Statement by U.S. President George Bush and Russian Federation President V.V. Putin, St. Petersburg, Russia, 15 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House (2010) National Security Strategy, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House (2011) National Strategy for Counterterrorism, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, A. (2012) ‘Nonproliferation and Threat Reduction Assistance: U.S. Programs in the Former Soviet Union’, CRS Report for Congress RL31957, Washington, DC: CRS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 James Sperling

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sperling, J. (2015). The EU-US Management of Nuclear Proliferation in the 21st Century: How Strategic a Strategic Partnership?. In: Blavoukos, S., Bourantonis, D., Portela, C. (eds) The EU and the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The European Union in International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378446_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics