Advertisement

Furnishing Status

Chapter
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

The legal battle over Bristol Customs official John Elbridge’s will opened with a contretemps about a small classical house and its furnishings.1 Despite an extraordinary inheritance of more than £10,000, Elbridge’s niece Rebecca Woolnough and her husband accused his executors of illicitly seeking to sell the possessions at Elbridge’s house, Cote. Although the executors offered to compensate Mrs Woolnough with furnishings from another house Elbridge owned near Bristol, she insisted there were ‘some few pieces of furniture’ that she was bent on having for herself. Appraisers drew up an inventory, which the Woolnoughs called ‘an Imperfect Schedule’ because it aggregated several of the best rooms rather than valuing individual objects. Although the household contents at Elbridge’s two dwellings were worth similar amounts — £290.8.10 and £303.12.8 respectively -the Woolnoughs insisted that ‘the furniture over the Down are of much greater Value’. Throughout the proceedings, Rebecca Woolnough displayed both emotional attachment to the goods at Cote house and a keen sense of their worth. In her desire to lay claim to ‘some few pieces of furniture’ she highlighted how individual pieces could be pivotal within the domestic setting. Such multi-layered reactions indicate how and in what ways objects displayed status for genteel people.

Keywords

Eighteenth Century Furnishing Status Ground Floor Household Possession Domestic Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    J. Cornforth, Early Georgian Interiors (London and New Haven, 2004), x.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    A. Vickery, The Gentleman’s Daughter: Women’s Lives in Georgian England (New Haven and London, 1998), 229.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    The idea draws largely on T. Veblen, The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (New York, 1899), and tends to be the more usual line taken by architectural and decorative arts historians.Google Scholar
  4. See also N. McKendrick, ‘The Consumer Revolution of Eighteenth-Century England’, in N. McKendrick, J. Brewer, and J. H. Plumb, (eds), The Birth of Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England (London, 1982), 9–33.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Bourdieu, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (London, 1984).Google Scholar
  6. See also AAA Hunt, The Middling Sort: Commerce, Gender and the Family in England, 1680–1780 (Berkeley, CA and London, 1996).Google Scholar
  7. A recent discussion is B. Blondé, N. Coquery, J. Stobart, and I. Van Damme, (eds), Fashioning Old and New: Changing Consumer Patterns in Europe (1650–1900) (Turnhout, Belgium, 2009), especially the essay by Blondé, ‘Conflicting Consumption Models’.Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    See, for example, J. Styles, and A. Vickery (eds), Gender, Taste and Material Culture in Britain and North America 1700–1830 (New Haven and London, 2006); H. Greig and G. Riello, (eds), Special Issue on Georgian Interiors in Journal of Design History, vol. 20, no. 4 (Winter 2007);Google Scholar
  9. K. Harvey, ‘Barbarity in a Tea Cup? Punch, Domesticity and Gender in the Eighteenth Century’, Journal of Design History, vol. 21, no. 3 (autumn 2008), 205–221;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Goodman and K. Norberg, (eds), Furnishing the Eighteenth Century: What Furniture Can Tell Us about the European and American Past (New York and London, 2007);Google Scholar
  11. A. Vickery, Behind Closed Doors: At Home in Georgian England (New Haven and London, 2009).Google Scholar
  12. 7.
    L. Weatherill, Consumer Behavior and Material Culture 1660–1760 (London, second edition, 1996);Google Scholar
  13. C. Shammas, The Pre-industrial Consumer in England and America (Oxford, 1990);Google Scholar
  14. M. Overton J. Whittle, D. Dean, and A. Hann, Production and Consumption in English Households, 1600–1750 (London, 2004).Google Scholar
  15. 8.
    H. R. French, The Middle Sort of People in Provincial England, 1600–1750 (Oxford, 2007), especially chapter 3;Google Scholar
  16. P. Earle, The Making of the English Middle Class: Business, Society and Family Life in London, 1660–1730 (London, 1989), chapter 8.Google Scholar
  17. 9.
    H. Greig and G. Riello, ‘Eighteenth-Century Interiors — Redesigning the Georgian: Introduction’, Journal of Design History, vol. 20, no. 4 (Winter 2007), 279. Peter Earle commented that a huge literature on the decorative arts is ‘addressed mainly to art historians, collectors and restorers rather than the social historian’. Earle, The Making of the English Middle Class, 292 fn 39;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Fowler and J. Cornforth, English Decoration in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1978);Google Scholar
  19. P. Thornton, Authentic Décor: The Domestic Interior, 1660–1920 (New York, 1984);Google Scholar
  20. C. Saumarez Smith, Eighteenth-Century Decoration: Design and the Domestic Interior in England (New York, 1993); Cornforth, Early Georgian Interiors; Google Scholar
  21. T. Murdoch, (ed.), Noble Households: Eighteenth-Century Inventories of Great English Households: A Tribute to John Cornforth (Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar
  22. J. Ayres, Domestic Interiors: The British Tradition 1500–1850 (New Haven and London, 2003), emphasizes smaller dwellings and craftsmen.Google Scholar
  23. 11.
    K. Harvey, The Little Republic: Masculinity and Domestic Authority in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Oxford, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. See also K. Harvey and A. Shepard, ‘What Have Historians Done with Masculinity? Reflections on Five Centuries of British History, circa 1500–1950’, introduction to a special feature on masculinities in The Journal of British Studies, vol. 44, no. 2 (2005), 274–280;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. M. Finn, ‘Men’s Things: Masculine Possession in the Consumer Revolution’, Social History, vol. 25, no. 2 (May 2000), 133–155;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. K. Harvey, ‘Men Making Home: Masculinity and Domesticity in Eighteenth-Century Britain’, Gender and History vol. 21, no. 3 (November 2009), 520–540;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. M. Berg, Luxury and Pleasure in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Oxford, 2005), 243.Google Scholar
  28. 12.
    J. Stobart, ‘Gentlemen and Shopkeepers: Supplying the Country House in Eighteenth-Century England’, Economic History Review, vol. 64, no. 3 (2011), 885–904, 888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 15.
    In England this was especially the case from the late sixteenth to the late seventeenth century, whilst evidence for Massachusetts sees a steep decline between the 1670s and 1770s. See C. Shammas, ‘Changes in English and Anglo-American Consumption from 1550 to 1800’, in J. Brewer and R. Porter, (eds), Consumption and the World of Goods (London, 1993), 190–193, especially tables 9.7 and 9.8. Cornforth calls this the ‘primacy of upholstery’, see Cornforth, Early Georgian Interiors, 75.Google Scholar
  30. 17.
    Vickery, Behind Closed Doors, 21; E. Harris, British Architectural Books and Writers 1556–1785 (Cambridge, 1990).Google Scholar
  31. 18.
    K. Retford, The Art of Domestic Life: Family Portraiture in Eighteenth-Century England (New Haven and London, 2006); K. Retford, ‘Patrilineal Portraiture? Gender and Genealogy in the Eighteenth-Century Country House’, in Styles and Vickery, (eds), Gender, Taste, and Material Culture, 323–352;Google Scholar
  32. D. Johnson, ‘Living in the Light: Quakerism and Colonial Portraiture’, in E. J. Lapsansky and A. Verplanck, (eds), Quaker Aesthetics: Reflections on a Quaker Ethic in American Design and Consumption (Philadelphia, 2003), 122–146.Google Scholar
  33. 19.
    Report from the Egerton MS 3440 (Leeds Papers vol. 117) appearing as Appendix 5 in C. Phillpotts, ‘Stroudend Tithing, Painswick, Gloucestershire Final Documentary Research Report’ (Unpublished report for Stroudend Tithing Educational Trust, 2010).Google Scholar
  34. 23.
    A. H. Gomme and A. Maguire, Design and Plan in the Country House: From Castle Donjons to Palladian Boxes (New Haven and London, 2008), 213, plan 159; GA/D45/F3: Inventory and copy will of William Whitmore of Lower Slaughter, 1724–1725.Google Scholar
  35. 26.
    K. Lipsedge, ‘“Enter into thy Closet”: Women, Closet Culture, and the Eighteenth-Century Novel’, in J. Styles and A. Vickery, (eds), Gender, Taste, and Material Culture in Britain and North America 1700–1830 (New Haven and London, 2006), 107–122;Google Scholar
  36. R. B. St George, ‘Reading Spaces in Eighteenth-Century New England’, in J. Styles and A. Vickery, (eds), Gender, Taste, and Material Culture in Britain and North America 1700–1830 (New Haven and London, 2006), 90–103.Google Scholar
  37. 28.
    This room almost certainly functioned as a personal informal sitting area. Cornforth, lor instance, notes that comfortable seating furniture, such as easy chairs, only began to appear in parlours from the 1730s. Cornforth, Early Georgian Interiors, 42. See also J. Crowley, The Invention of Comfort: Sensibilities and Design in Early Modern Britain and America (Baltimore, 2001), 145–146.Google Scholar
  38. 34.
    Thornton, Authentic Décor, 24, 59; A. Bowett, English Furniture: 1660–1714: Charles II to Queen Anne (Woodbridge, Suffolk, 2002), 76–79.Google Scholar
  39. 35.
    Both Virginia walnut and mahogany became much more readily available after the passing of the Naval Stores Act in 1721. See A. Bowett, ‘The Commercial Introduction of Mahogany and the Naval Stores Act of 1721’, Furniture History, vol. 30 (1994), 43–57;Google Scholar
  40. A. Bowett, ‘After the Naval Stores Act: Some Implications for English Walnut Furniture’, Furniture History, vol. 31 (1995), 116–123.Google Scholar
  41. 37.
    Ayres, Domestic Interiors, 82; G. Beard, Upholsterers and Interior Furnishings in England 1530–1840 (New Haven and London, 1997).Google Scholar
  42. 38.
    N. Rothstein and S. M. Levy, ‘Furnishings, c. 1500–1780’, in D. Jenkins, (ed.), The Cambridge History of Western Fextiles, 2 vols (Cambridge, 2003), vol. 1, 631–658, 633. For comparative bed values, see Cornforth, Early Georgian Interiors, 91–92. Cornforth notes how rare were survivals of ‘simple beds hung in woollen materials and cotton’.Google Scholar
  43. 39.
    B. Lemire, ‘Fashioning Cottons: Asian Trade, Domestic Industry and Consumer Demand, 1660–1780’, in D. Jenkins, (ed.), The Cambridge History of Western Textiles, 2 vols (Cambridge, 2003), vol. 1, 493–512; Idem, Fashion’s Favourite: The Cotton Trade and the Consumer in Britain 1660–1800 (Oxford, 1991), 12–42.Google Scholar
  44. 40.
    Lemire, Fashion’s Favourite, 41. The restrictions were ineffective, however, and by the 1730s cotton manufacturing had resumed in Britain. Lemire, ‘Fashioning Cottons’, 504; G. Riello and P. Parthasarathi, (eds), The Spinning World: A Global History of Cotton Textiles, 1200–1850 (Oxford, 2009), especially chapters 10, 11, and 13.Google Scholar
  45. 43.
    On gilt leather hangings, see AAA Saunders, Wallpaper in Interior Decoration (London, 2002), 121–123.Google Scholar
  46. 49.
    Cornforth, Early Georgian Interiors, 88–89, 92; Rothstein and Levy, ‘Furnishings, c. 1500–1780’, 653. For textile prices, see C. Shammas, ‘The Decline of Textile Prices in England and British America Prior to Industrialization’, Economic History Review, vol. 47, no. 3 (1994), 483–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 52.
    C. L. and K. A. Wulf, (eds), Milcah Martha Moore’s Book: A Commonplace Book from Revolutionary America (University Park, PA, 1997), 209.Google Scholar
  48. 63.
    L. G. Carr and L S. Walsh, ‘Changing Lifestyle and Consumer Behavior in the Colonial Chesapeake’, in C. Carson, R. Hoffman, and P.J. Albert, (eds), Of Consuming Interest: The Style of Life in the Eighteenth Century (Charlottesville, 1994), 59–166, at 65–66.Google Scholar
  49. 68.
    Carr and Walsh, ‘Changing Lifestyles and Consumer Behavior’, 103–104. See also W. B. Gusler, Furniture of Williamsburg and Eastern Virginia, 1710–1790 (Williamsburg, VA, reprint edition, 1993), 178–181.Google Scholar
  50. 69.
    W. Eddis, Letters from America, in A. C. Land, (ed.) (Cambridge, MA, 1969), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 70.
    R. C. Nash, ‘Domestic Material Culture and Consumer Demand in the British Atlantic World: Colonial South Carolina, 1670–1770’, in D. Shields, (ed.), Material Culture in Anglo-America: Regional Identity and Urbanity in the Tidewater, Lowcountry and Caribbean (Columbia, SC, 2009), 221–266.Google Scholar
  52. 71.
    AAA Sweeney, ‘Mansion People: Kinship, Class, and Architecture in Western Massachusetts in the Mid Eighteenth Century’, Winterthur Portfolio, vol. 19, no. 4 (Winter 1984), 231–255, 246, 249–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 72.
    J. G. Volk, (ed.), The Warner House: A Rich and Colorful History (Portsmouth, NH, 2006), 55.Google Scholar
  54. 73.
    AAA Chan, Slavery in the Age of Reason: Archaeology at a New England Farm (Knoxville, TN, 2007), 106, Table 6.Google Scholar
  55. 74.
    J. K. Hosmer, The Life of Thomas Hutchinson (Boston and New York, 1896), Appendix A, 351–362.Google Scholar
  56. 75.
    W. Burch, ‘Furnishing Plan: Johnson Hall State Historic Site’ (Unpublished report on file at Johnson Hall, 2003); John Weatherhead, New York, to WJ, PSWJ, vol. 7, 173; 14 October 1771, Carpenter Wharton to WJ, PSWJ, vol. 8, 293–294.Google Scholar
  57. 76.
    L. C. Rubenstein, ‘Johnson Hall’ (Unpublished Winterthur/University of Delaware M. A. Thesis, 1958), 118–119; W. Burch, ‘Furnishing Plan’.Google Scholar
  58. 77.
    R. V. Shepherd, ‘James Logan’s Stenton: Grand Simplicity in Quaker Philadelphia’ (MA Thesis, Winterthur/University of Delaware, 1968), is a reliable guide to Logan’s furnishing of Stenton, although it somewhat overemphasizes the Quaker plainness idea. This has been supplemented and corrected in parts by recent research on the Stenton collection, especially the furniture.Google Scholar
  59. See L. C. Keim, ‘Stenton Room Furnishings Study’ (MS report, 2010, on file at Stenton). P. D. Zimmerman’s series of articles: ‘Philadelphia Case Furniture at Stenton’, The Magazine Antiques (May 2002), 94–101; ‘Eighteenth-Century Chairs at Stenton’, The Magazine Antiques (May 2003), 122–129; ‘Early American Tables and Other Furniture at Stenton’, The Magazine Antiques (May 2004), 102–109.Google Scholar
  60. 78.
    On currency exchange, see J. J. McCusker, Money and Exchange in Europe and America, 1600–1775: A Handbook (Chapel Hill, NC, 1978), especially 175–188. For comparative costs for beds see John Cornforth, Early Georgian Interiors, 83, 91.Google Scholar
  61. 88.
    G. L. Main and J. T. Main, ‘Economic Growth and the Standard of Living in Southern New England, 1640–1774’, Journal of Economic History, vol. 48, no. 1 (March 1988), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 93.
    M. Rothery and J. Stobart, ‘Inheritance Events and Spending Patterns in the English Country House: The Leigh Family of Stoneleigh Abbey, 1738–1806’, Continuity and Change, vol. 27, no. 3 (2012), 379–407, 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 95.
    Collett-White, (ed.), Inventories of Bedfordshire Country Houses. Some of the smaller houses described include Colworth House (1723, £365) and Hinwick House (1766, £570); G. Glanville and P. Glanville, ‘The Art Market and Merchant Patronage in London 1680 to 1720’, in M. Galinou, (ed.), City Merchants and the Arts (London, 2004), 11–24, especially 11–12.Google Scholar
  64. 97.
    D. Cohen, Household Gods: The British and their Possessions (New Haven, 2006), 86.Google Scholar
  65. 100.
    Quoted in R. Hoffman, ‘Preface’, in AAA Carson et al., (eds), Of Consuming Interest: The Style of Life in the Eighteenth Century (Charlottesville, 1994), xi.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Stephen Hague 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rowan UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations