Skip to main content

Using Social Media to Enhance Critical Thinking: Crossing Socio-Educational Divides

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education

Abstract

Imagine the case of a first-year music student who is writing a review of an all-Beethoven concert that she attended the previous night (a typical assignment type for a music undergraduate). The student should first have carried out background research (reading/listening) on the performers and repertoire before attending the concert and taking notes. Ideally she will now not only summarize her experience, but will also take the critical “step back,” to reflect on the event and offer evaluative comments that are supported by evidence. This will involve consideration of various parameters (musical, visual, social, etc.) and perspectives (audience reception, performers’ expression and style, comparison with similar ensembles, etc.). Even if the repertoire is familiar, the task is complex, especially the reflective evaluation based on multiple perspectives. Typically students stumble over the latter, so that the shift out of descriptive mode, and out of the frame of their own unexamined reactions, never fully takes place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, B., and Simpson, M. 1998. “Learning and Teaching at a Distance: A Social Affair.” Computers in NZ Schools 10 (1): 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. 2008. “Towards a Theory of Online Learning.” In Theory and Practice of Online Learning, edited by T. Anderson. Edmonton, AB: AU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andone, D. M., Dron, J., Pemberton, L., and Boyne, C. W. 2007. “E-Learning Environments for Digitally-Minded Students.” Journal of Interactive Learning Research 18 (1): 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., and Lai, S.-L. 2009. “Measuring Self-Regulation in Online and Blended Learning Environments.” Internet and Higher Education 12 (1): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. 1997. Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., Maton, K., and Kervin, L. 2008. “The ‘Digital Natives’ Debate: A Critical Review of the Evidence.” British Journal of Educational Technology 39 (5): 775–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. 2006. The Skillful Teacher: On Technique, Trust, and Responsiveness in the Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, B., and Payton, J. K. 1990. “A New Writing Environment and an Old Culture: A Situated Evaluation of Computer Networking to Teach Writing.” Interactive Learning Environments 1 (3): 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, D. D., and Lawson, M. J. 2001. “Exploring Collaborative Online Learning.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5 (1): 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., and Lorentsen, A. 2003. “Transforming University Practice through ICT—Integrated Perspectives on Organizational, Technological, and Pedagogical Change.” Interactive Learning Environments 11 (2): 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doering, A. 2007. “Adventure Learning: Situating Learning in an Authentic Context.” Innovate: Journal of Online Education 3 (6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmundson, M. 2008. Dwelling in Possibilities. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R. 1999. Schubert’s Vienna. Vienna: Lehner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flottemesch, K. 2001. “Building Effective Interactions in Distance Education: A Review of the Literature.” In The 2001/2002 ASTD Distance Learning Yearbook, edited by K. Mantyla and J. A. Woods. London: McGraw-Hill. 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, M. A. 2004. “Learning Together: Exploring Group Interactions Online.” Journal of Distance Education 19 (1): 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. 1993. “A Cognitive Constructivist View of Distance Education: An Analysis of Teaching-Learning Assumptions.” Distance Education 14 (2): 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. 1999. “Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education.” The Internet and Higher Education 2 (2): 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, C. 2010. “What Do University Teachers Think Elearning Is Good for in Their Teaching?” Studies in Higher Education 35 (1): 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. R., and Misanchuk, M. 2004. “Computer-Mediated Learning Groups: Benefits and Challenges to Using Groupwork in Online Learning Environments” In Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice, edited by T. S. Roberts. London: Information Science. 181–202.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, J., Kell, C., and Spence, F. 2007. “Peer Assessment Using Aropä.” Australian Computer Society. http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~j-hamer/peer-assessment-using-Aropa.pdf.

  • Hannon, J. 2009. “Breaking Down Online Teaching: Innovation and Resistance.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 25 (1): 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, D. 2002. “The Social Dimensions of On-Line Learning: Perceptions, Theories, and Practical Responses.” Paper presented at the Distance Education Association of New Zealand Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, April 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsper, E. J., and Eynon, R. 2009. “Digital Natives: Where Is the Evidence?” British Educational Research Journal 36 (3): 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J., and Marra, R. M. 2002. Learning to Solve Problems with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. 2nd ed. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. M., and Haenlein, M. 2010. “Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media.” Business Horizons 53 (1): 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kek, M. Y. C. A., and Huijser, H. 2011. “The Power of Problem Based Learning in Developing Critical Thinking Skills: Preparing Students for Tomorrow’s Digital Futures in Today’s Classrooms.” Higher Education Research & Development 30 (3): 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Guin, E. 2006. Boccherini’s Body. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, A. 2008. “Facebook in the Classroom: Integration of Online and Classroom Debates into Courses.” http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/group-3300/face-book-in-the-classroom-integration-of-online-and-classroom-debates-into-courses.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P. Y., Goi, C. L., and Gribble, S. J. 2008. “Adaptation of Google Group for Online Teaching and Learning.” In HERDSA 2008: Engaging Communities. Milperra, NSW: HERDSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • November, N. R., and Day, K. 2012. “Using Undergraduates’ Digital Literacy Skills to Improve Their Discipline-Specific Writing: A Dialogue.” International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6 (2): Article 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D., and Oblinger, J. 2005. Educating the Net Generation. Edited by D. Oblinger and J. Oblinger. Louisville, CO: Educause.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D., Jay, E., and Tishman, S. 1993. “Beyond Abilities: A Dispositional Theory of Thinking.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 39 (1): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. 2003. “Writing: A Method of Inquiry.” In Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 499–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., and Witty, J. V. 2010. “Findings on Facebook in Higher Education: A Comparison of College Faculty and Student Uses and Perceptions of Social Networking Sites.” Internet and Higher Education 13: 134–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. 2000. E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. London: Kogan Page.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. 2002. E-Tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., and Suthers, D. 2006. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: An Historical Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, R. 1998. Growing up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. 2013. “An Initial Development and Validation of a Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS).” Computers & Education 67: 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, S. 2009. Teaching Writing Online: How and Why. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wass, R., Harland, T., and Mercer, A. 2011. “Scaffolding Critical Thinking in the Zone of Proximal Development.” Higher Education Research & Development 30 (3): 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. 2000. “A Framework for Critical Thinking.” High School Magazine 7: 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C., McDermott, R., and Snyder, W. C. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yearsley, D. 2012. Bach’s Feet: The Organ Pedals in European Culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Martin Davies Ronald Barnett

Copyright information

© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

November, N. (2015). Using Social Media to Enhance Critical Thinking: Crossing Socio-Educational Divides. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics