Abstract
Au pairs are an important form of relatively affordable childcare and domestic labour for households across the UK. They allow two-parent and single-parent families to combine paid work outside the home with the demands of home and children, as well as allowing parents and carers to enjoy leisure activities when they might otherwise have been cleaning, shopping, cooking or caring for infants and children. However, the value of the many hours a week of childcare and domes- tic work performed by au pairs is obscured by the social construction of au pairing as something other than ‘work’. Au pairing is instead constructed as a ‘cultural exchange’, an extended holiday, a ‘win-win’ situation or a ‘time-out’ from the normal life of the au pair.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, B. (2000) Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour (London/New York: Zed Books).
Anderson, B. (2006) A very private business: Migration and domestic work (Oxford: COMPAS Working Paper 28).
Anderson, B. (2009) ‘What’s in a name? Immigration controls and subjectivities: The case of au pair and domestic worker visa holders in the UK, Subjectivity, 29:407–424.
Anderson, B. (2010) ‘Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers, work’, Employment and Society, 24: 300.
Anderson, B., Ruhs, M., Rogaly, B. and Spencer, S. (2006) Fair enough? Central and Eastern European migrants in low wage employment in the United Kingdom, Compas Working Paper.
Annttonen, A. and Sipilä, J. (1996) ‘European social care services: Is it possible to identify models?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6 (2):87–100.
Boyer, Kate, Reimer, Suzanne and Irvine, Lauren (2013) ‘The nursery workspace, emotional labour, and contested understandings of commoditised childcare in the contemporary UK’, Social and Cultural Geography, 14, (5),517–540 (doi:10. 1080/14649365.2012.710913).
Bûrikovâ, Zuzana and Miller, Daniel (2010) Au Pair (Cambridge/Maiden, MA: Polity Press).
Busch, N. (2012) A Migrant Division of Labour in the Global City: Commoditised In-Home Childcare in London 2004–2010 (London: Birkbeck, University of London).
Constable, N. (2007) Maid to Order in Hong Kong: Stories of Migrant Workers. Second Edition. (Revised and updated edition oiMaid to Order: Stories ofFilipina Workers CUP 1997) (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).
Council of Europe (1969) European Agreement on Au Pair Placement. Strasbourg, 24. XI. 1969.
Cox, R. (2006) The Servant Problem: Domestic Employment in a Global Economy (London: I. B. Tauris).
Cox, R. (2012) ‘Gendered work and migration regimes’, in Aslaug Sollund, R. and Leonard, L. (eds.) Transnational Migration, Gender and Rights: Advances in Ecopolitics, 10 (7), (Bingley UK: Emerald), pp.33–52. ISBN 9781780522029.
Daly, M. (2002) ‘Care as a good for social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 31 (2):251–270.
Daycare Trust (2007) Childcare Nation? Progress on the Childcare Strategy and Priorities for the Future (London: Daycare Trust).
Esping-Anderson, G. (1993) Changing Classes; Stratification and Mobility in Postindustrial Societies (London: Sage).
Gaffney D. (2008) ‘Child poverty, childcare provision and parental employment: lessons from London’ in Research in Public Policy: Bulletin for the Centre for Market and Public Organisation, Issue 7, Autumn 2008.
Gregson, N. and M. Lowe (1994) Servicing the Middle Classes: Class, Gender and Waged Domestic Labour in Contemporary Britain (London: Routledge).
Haas, B. (2005) ‘Work-care balance: Is it possible to identity typologies for cross-national comparisons?’, Current Sociology, 53: 487
Hess, S. and Puckhaber, A. (2004) ‘“Big sisters” are better servants?! Comments on the booming au pair business’, Feminist Review, 77:65–78.
Home Office (2006) A Points Based System: Making Migration Work for Britain (London: HMSO).
Jarvis, H., Pratt, A.C. and Wu, P.C-C. (2001) The Secret Life of Cities: Social Reproduction of Everyday Life (London, Routledge).
Kofrnan, E., Raghuram, P. and Merefleld, M. (2005) ‘Gendered migrations, towards gender sensitive policies in the UK’, Asylum and Migration Working Paper No. 6 (London: Institute for Public Policy Research).
Kremer, M. (2002) ‘The illusion ol free choice: Ideals ol care and child care policy in the Flemish and Dutch welfare states’ in Michel, S. and Mahon, R. (eds) Child Care at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring (London: Routledge).
Lutz, H. (ed.) (2008) Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on Global Themes (Aldershot: Ashgate).
Macdonald, C. L (2010) Shadow Mothers: Nannies, Au Pairs, and the Micropolitics of Mothering (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
Newcombe, E. (2003) ‘Temporary migration to the UK as an “au pair”: Cultural exchange or reproductive labour?’, Migration Working Paper No. 21 (Brighton: University of Sussex).
Oien, C. (2009) On Equal Terms? An Evaluation of the Norwegian Au Pair Scheme, Fafo Report.
Ozyegin, Gul and Pierette Hondagneu-Sotelo (2008) ‘Conclusion: Domestic work, migration and new gender order in contemporary Europe’, in Helma Lutz (ed.) Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme (Aldershot: Ashgate).
Sassen, S. (2001 2nd Edition) The Global City: New York, London and Tokyo (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Sollund, R. (2010) ‘Regarding au pairs in the Norwegian welfare state’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 17 (2):143–160.
Stenum, H. (2010) ‘Au-pair migration and new inequalities: The transnational production of corruption’, in Lise Widding Isaksen (ed.) Global Care Work: Gender and Migration in Nordic Societies (Lund, Sweden: Nordic Academic Press).
Tronto, J. (2002) ‘The “nanny” question in feminism’, Hypatia, 17 (2):34–51.
Williams, E (2004) Rethinking Families (London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation).
Williams, F. and Gavanas, A. (2008) ‘The intersection of childcare regimes and migration regimes: A three-country study’, in Helma Lutz (ed.) Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme (Aldershot: Ashgate).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Nicole Busch
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Busch, N. (2015). When Work Doesn’t Pay: Outcomes of a Deregulated Childcare Market and Au Pair Policy Vacuum in the UK. In: Cox, R. (eds) Au Pairs’ Lives in Global Context. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377487_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377487_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47796-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37748-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)