Abstract
The ideas associated with neoliberalism have become deeply entrenched within state institutions in a large part of the world, and these ideas have a specific political economy. Accompanying them is the notion that the market should discipline the political system (Sager, 2011) and therefore the general population, if we accept the mainstream assumption that the political system is a representation of the will of the people. The recent explosion of literature on neoliberalism (see Peck, 2010) has demonstrated that the concept is a powerful lens through which to examine regulatory and institutional transformation at a range of spatial scales and different socio-political contexts. Of particular import here is the work which emphasises that neoliberalism is not a static concept but a dynamic process. Here, neoliberalism can be seen as a form of regulatory reorganisation to impose, extend and consolidate marketised commodified forms of social life (Brenner et al., 2010). It is, as Peck (2010, p. 9) notes, about the capture and reuse of the state in the interests of shaping a ‘pro-corporate, free-trading “market order” ‘. However, the process by which this happens (neoliberalisation) is rarely identical from one place to the next, at different scales, or indeed, across different socio-political contexts. In other words, processes of neoliberalisation are dynamic, slippery and highly adaptable, and this is precisely what contributes to the persistence of neoliberal ideas.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albrechts, L. (2002) The planning community reflects on enhancing public involvement: Views from academics and reflective practitioners, Planning Theory and Practice, 3, 331–47.
Allmendinger, P. (1996) Thatcherism and Simplified Planning Zones: An Implementation Perspective. Oxford Planning Monographs, 2. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
An Taisce (2012) Stare of the Nation: A Review of Ireland’s Planning System 2000 — 2011. Dublin: An Taisce.
Brenner, N., Peck, J. and Theodore, N. (2010) After neoliberalization? Globalizations, 7, 327–45.
Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (2002) Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’, Antipode, 34, 348–79.
Connolly, J. (2000) The Planning and Development Bill 1999 and access to the Courts, Irish PI a tin ing a rid En viro n m en ta I law Jo u m al, 7, 62–64.
Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (DoEHLG). (2007) Development Management Guidelines for Planning Authorities. Dublin: Stationery Office.
Dodd, S. (2004) Substantial interest, locus standi and judicial review: Recent developments, Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal, 11, 9–16.
Ellis, G. (2001) A review of third party planning appeals, Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal, 8, 63–69.
Flynn, T. (2000) Strategic Development Zones and the Planning Act 2000, Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal, 7, 101–04.
Fox-Rogers, L. and Murphy, E. (2013) Informal strategies of power in the local planning system, Planning Theory, DOI: 10.1177/1473095213492512.
Fox-Rogers, L., Murphy, E. and Grist, B. (2011) Legislative change in Ireland: A Marxist political economy critique of planning law, Town Planning Review, 82, 639–68.
Government of Ireland. (2012) The Tribunal of Enquiry into Certain Planning Matters and Payments. Dublin: Dublin Stationery Office.
Grist, B. (1983) Twenty Years of Planning: A Review of the System since 1963. Dublin: An Foras Forbartha.
Grist, B. (2001) Curtailment of Third Party Planning Appeals in the Republic of Ireland, Scottish Planning and Environmental Law, 86, 80–82.
Grist, B. (2008) The Planning and Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act — one year on, Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal, 15, 3–11.
Grist, B. (2012) An Introduction to Irish Planning Law. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
Grist, B. and Macken, J. (2010) The Irish Planning Law Factbook. Dublin: Thomson Round Hall.
Harvey, D. (1973) Social Justice and the City. London: Edward Arnold.
Harvey, D. (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism, Geograßska Annaler, 71B, 3–17.
Macken, J. (1999) The Planning and Development Bill, 1999, Bar Review, 5, 148–57.
McGuirk, P. (1995) Power and influence in urban planning: Community and property interests participation in Dublin’s planning system, Irish Geography, 28, 64–75.
McGuirk, P. M. (1994) Economic restructuring and the realignment of the urban planning system: The case of Dublin, Urban Studies, 31, 289–307.
Murphy, E. and Scott, M. (2013) Mortgage-related issues in a crisis economy: Evidence from rural households in Ireland, Geo forum, 46, 34–44.
Peck, J. (2010) Constructions of’Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A. (1994) Jungle law breaks out: Neoliberalism and globablocal disorder, Area, 26, 317–26.
Sager, T. (2011) Neo4iberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990–2010, Progress in Planning, 76, 147–99.
Simmie, J. and French, S. (1989) Corporatism, participation and planning: The case of London, Progress in Planning, 31, 1–57.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Enda Murphy, Linda Fox-Rogers and Berna Grist
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murphy, E., Fox-Rogers, L., Grist, B. (2014). The Political Economy of Legislative Change: Neoliberalising Planning Legislation. In: MacLaran, A., Kelly, S. (eds) Neoliberal Urban Policy and the Transformation of the City. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377050_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377050_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47788-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37705-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)