Skip to main content

Unconstitutional Takings of Private Property

  • Chapter
Private Property and the Constitution
  • 146 Accesses

Abstract

Since the Penn Central decision in 1978, there have been occasional indications that the economic liberties of the constitution might be given a new life. But through it all, the now ageless question of whether a regulation of private property has gone too far has remained the defining issue in property rights jurisprudence. Without a marker to determine when a regulation has gone too far, there is nothing left but “sifting facts and weighing circumstances,”1 all in service to the Penn Central balancing test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, e.g., Michael C. Blumm & Lucas Ritchie, Lucas’s Unlikely Legacy: The Rise of Background Principles as Categorical Takings Defenses, 29 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 321, 367 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.B. Ruhl, Making Nuisance Ecological, 58 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 753, 759 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For in-depth explanations of the historic and theoretical errors in the arguments of Ruhl, Blumm and Ritchie, see James L. Huffman, Background Principles and the Rule of Law: Fifteen Years after Lucas, 35 Ecology L.Q. 1 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. James L. Huffman, Beware of Greens in Praise of the Common Law, 58 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 813 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 544 U.S. 528, 542 (2005). Justice O’Connor is here quoting Chevron’s brief, which is in turn quoting Armstongv. United States, 364 U.S. 40, 49 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 James L. Huffman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huffman, J.L. (2013). Unconstitutional Takings of Private Property. In: Private Property and the Constitution. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137376732_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics