Abstract
The discipline of International Relations (IR) exhibits a bias when it comes to the central players in world politics. As the name suggests, the object of IR study is the interactions and relations between nation-states. Quite ironically however, there is increasing skepticism among IR scholars of the (implicit or explicit) assumption of state-centrality. State power, authority and sovereignty dissipate towards all sides: sideways towards private actors such as multinational corporations (MNCs) or non-governmental organizations (NGOs); downwards to sub national players such as cities; and upwards towards international or supranational organizations (Hanrieder, 1978, p. 1278; Schmidt, 1995; Matthews, 1997; Christiansen, 2000, p. 194; Pierre and Peters, 2000, p. 77; Zielonka, 2007, pp.191–194; Segbers, 2011; cf. Murdoch et al, 2013, p. 3). As a result, renaming the discipline from ‘IR’ to ‘Global Politics’ seems appropriate (Griffiths, 2008; Held et al., 1999, p. 49; McGrew, 2008).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Frauke Austermann
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Austermann, F. (2014). Centralization of European Diplomacy in Theory. In: European Union Delegations in EU Foreign Policy. The European Union in International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137376312_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137376312_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47765-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37631-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)