Abstract
Classical pragmatism understood that human action is replete with m eaning and purpose; problem solving is continuous with adaptation; philosophy is continuous with, but not reduced to, science, but s elf-corrective inquiry is at the heart of the naturalizing self-correction and problem solving.1 An appreciation of nature, in addition to human meaning bound with human community, scientific and otherwise, reveals the importance of classical pragmatism. In addition, an understanding of common sense ‘critical realism’2 is key to classical pragmatism, meaning abstractions are not considered more real than the objects encountered, and staying anchored to objects was of great importance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John Dewey, Experience and Nature (New York: Dover Press, 1925/1989).
Roy Wood Sellars, Evolutionary Naturalism (Chicago: Open Court Press, 1922).
William James, Essays in Radical Empiricism (New York: Longman, Green and Co., 1912/1958).
S. Carey, Conceptual Change in Childhood (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985, 1987)
F. Keil, Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979).
Dewey, ‘The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology’, Psychological Review 3 (1896): 357–370.
Jay Schulkin, The Pursuit of Inquiry (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1992).
J.J. Gibson, The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (New York: Houghton-Mifflin, 1966).
Peirce, ‘Deduction, Induction and Hypothesis’, Popular Science Monthly, 13 (1878): 470–482.
J. E. Smith, Themes in American Philosophy (New York: Harper and Row, 1970)
R. C. Neville, The Cosmology of Freedom (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974).
Mark Johnson, The Body in the Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987/1990).
Chauncey Wright, ‘Evolution of Self-Consciousness’, The North American Review 116 (1873): 245–310.
P. Mellars, ‘Why Did Modern Human Populations Disperse from Africa 60,000 Years Ago?’ PNAS 103 (2006): 9381–9386.
H. M. McHenry, ‘Human Evolution’, in Evolution: The First Four Billion Years, ed. M. Ruse and J. Travis (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009)
R. Foley, ‘In the Shadow of the Modem Synthesis?’ Evolutionary Anthropology 10 (2001): 5–14.
S. Robson, and B. Wood, ‘Hominin Life History: Reconstruction and Evolution’, Journal of Anatomy 212 (2008): 394–425.
R. I. M. Dunbar, and S. Shultz, ‘Evolution in the Social Brain’, Science 317 (2007): 1344–1347.
G. Gigerenzer, Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000)
Gigerenzer, Gut Feelings (New York: Viking Press, 2007).
Gigerenzer, Adaptive Thinking; Andy Clark, Being There (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997).
M. Donald, Origins of the Modern Mind (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991)
C. Monis, The Pragmatic Movement in American Philosophy (New York: George Braziller, 1970).
D. Denton, The Hunger for Salt (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1982).
A. N. Meltzoff, and M. K. Moore, ‘Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates’, Science 198 (1977): 75–78.
N. R. Hanson, Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958/1972)
George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh (New York: Basic Books, 1999).
Hilary Putnam, Realism With a Human Face (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990)
A. M. Graybiel, ‘The Basal Ganglia and Chunking of Action Repertoires’, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 70 (1998): 119–136
M. Donald, ‘Hominid Enculturation and Cognitive Evolution’, in The Development of the Mediated Mind ed. J. M. Luraciello, J. A. Hudson, R. Fibush, and P.J. Baver (Mawash, NJ: Erlbaum Press, 2004).
Schulkin, Action, Perception and the Brain (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).
R. R. Linas, I of the Vortex (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001).
M. Jeannerod, The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1997)
J. Decety and P. W. Jackson, ‘A Social Neuroscience Perspective on Empathy’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 (2006): 54–58.
D. Perrett, and A. Mistlin, ‘Perception of Facial Characteristics by Monkeys’, in Comparative Perception, vol 2: Complex Signals, ed. W. Stebbins and M. Berkeley (New York: Wiley, 1990)
V. Gallese, L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi, and G. Rizzolatti, Action Recognition in the Premotor Cortex, Brain, 119 (1996): 593–609.
R. Desimone, ‘Neural Mechanisms for Visual Memory and Their Role in Attention’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93 (1996): 13494–13499.
D. Milner, and M. A. Goodale, The Visual Brain in Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).
L. Hickman, Philosophical Tools for Technological Culture (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2001).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Jay Schulkin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schulkin, J. (2014). Pragmatism, Cognitive Capacity and Brain Function. In: Solymosi, T., Shook, J.R. (eds) Neuroscience, Neurophilosophy and Pragmatism. New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137376077_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137376077_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47758-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37607-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)