Skip to main content

The Global as Local/Othello as Omkara

  • Chapter
Bollywood Shakespeares

Abstract

Although the 1965 Merchant Ivory production, Shakespeare Wallah, sets up Hindi cinema as a cultural form that is radically different from and in competition with Shakespearean theater, the genre does have a long history of engagement with the works of William Shakespeare. 1 The history of Shakespeare in India is itself a fairly long one. Performed first in Calcutta and Bombay in the 1770s as entertainment to the early traders, eventually made a staple of an educational system dictated by colonial policy, and soon after translated into Indian languages and played on stage in Calcutta, Bombay, and other urban centers, early Hindi film remakes of Shakespeare were adaptations of the well-known Parsi theater productions. The 1927 silent film Dil Farosh, for instance, was a cinematic version of an early twentieth-century stage version of The Merchant of Venice and the 1932 film Hathili Dulhan was a remake of the popular Parsi theater version of The Taming of the Shrew.2 Adaptation has long been considered acceptable in Indian artistic traditions, and is perceived neither as indicative of an embarrassing lack of “originality,” nor as transgressive or revisionary. Discussing the history of Shakespearean performance in India, Poonam Trivedi points out that in the Indian tradition the practice of adaptation is seen as permitting “rewritings to exist without challenging the status of the ‘original’ urtext. And what is more, in the multilingual context of the subcontinent, it functions as localizing, indigenizing, and ultimately democratizing factor: just as the Sanskrit epics had been reworked in the regional languages, so was Shakespeare adapted into local cultures.” 3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Film Theory and Criticism. Edited by Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. 791–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, Mark. Filming Shakespeare in the Global Marketplace. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boose, Lynda E. and Richard Burt, “Totally Clueless? Shakespeare goes Hollywood in the 1990s.” Shakespeare the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, and Video. Edited by Lynda E. Boose and Richard Burt. New York: Routledge, 1997. 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartelli, Thomas and Katherine Rowe, New Wave Shakespeare on Screen. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarti, Paromita. “Modernity, Postcoloniality and Othello: The case of Saptapadi.” Remaking Shakespeare: Performance across Medias, Genres, and Cultures. Edited by Pascale Aebischer, Edward Esche, and Nigel Wheale. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, Bankim Chandra. “Shakuntala, Miranda, and Desdemona.” Bibidha Prabandha. Calcutta: Bangiya Sahitya Parishad, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, Partha. “The Nationalist Resolution of the Women’s Question.” Recasting Women: Essays in Colonial History. Kumkum Sangari and Sudesh Vaid. New Delhi: Zubaan Publications, 2007. 233–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, Craig and Parmita Kapadia, “Introduction.” Native Shakespeares: Indigenous Appropriations on a Global Stage. Edited by Craig Dionne and Paramita Kapadia. Burlington, VT: Ashgate. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirlik, Arif. “The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism.” Critical Inquiry 20. 2 (1994). 328–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganti, Tejaswini. Bollywood: A Guidebook to Popular Hindi Cinema. New York: Routledge, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, Frederic. Post-modernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalwani, Vickey. “Why Omkara flopped at the Box Office?” http://www.bollyvista.com/article/a/32/6997. August 30, 2006. Accessed January 19, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomba, Ania. Gender, Race, Renaissance Drama. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomba, Ania. “Local-Manufacture-Made-in-India Othello Fellows: Issues of Race, Hyrbridity and Location in Post-olonial Shakespeares.” Post-colonial Shakespeares. Edited by Ania Loomba and Martin Orkin. New York: Routledge, 1998. 143–64.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Massai, Sonia. “Introduction.” World-Wide Shakespeare: Local Appropriation in Film and Performance. New York: Routledge, 2004. 3–11.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, Ranjani. Bombay Cinema: An Archive of a City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, Vijay. Bollywood Cinema: Temples of Desire. New York: Routledge, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajadhyaksha, Ashish. “The ‘Bollywoodization’ of the Indian Cinema: Cultural Nationalism in a Global Arena.” The Inter -Asia Cultural Studies Reader. Edited by Kuan Hsing Chen and Chua Beng Huat. Routledge: New York, 2007. 449–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajadhyaksha, Ashish. The Encyclopedia of Indian Cinema. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999. 137

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushdie, Salman. The Moor’s Last Sigh. London: Vintage, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, Dennis. “Acting Shakespeare in Postcolonial Space.” Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance. Edited by James Bulman. New York: Routledge, 1996. 113–33.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Jyotsna and Sudipto Chatterjee. “Moor or Less? The Surveillance of Othello.” Shakespeare and Appropriation. Edited by Christy Desmet and Robert Sawyer. New York: Routledge, 1999. 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Gary. “Afterword: The Incredible Shrinking Bard.” Shakespeare and Appropriation. Edited by Christy Desmet and Robert Sawyer. New York: Routledge, 1999. 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, Poonam. “‘It is the bloody business that informs thus...’: Local politics and Performative Praxis, Macbeth in India.” Worldwide Shakespeares: Local appropriation in Film and Performance. Edited by Sonia Massai. New York: Routledge, 2006. 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan, Ravi S. Making Meaning in Indian Cinema. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, Rajiva. “Shakespeare in Hindi Cinema.” India’s Shakespeare: Translation, Interpretation, and Performance. Edited by Poonam Trivedi and Dennis Bartholomeusz. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2005. 269–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Craig Dionne and Parmita Kapadia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Charry, B., Shahani, G. (2014). The Global as Local/Othello as Omkara. In: Dionne, C., Kapadia, P. (eds) Bollywood Shakespeares. Reproducing Shakespeare: New Studies in Adaptation and Appropriation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137375568_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics