Abstract
Victor Turner argues that social life is continually being rewritten as a consequence of an ongoing struggle between ‘indeterminacy ‘(i.e., the wish, the possibility, that which ‘could be ‘or ‘should be’) and ‘all modes of determination ‘(i.e., the normative structure which attempts to bind society or parts of it into a harmonious whole).1 In the struggle, theatre as an ‘explanation and explication of life itself’2 functions as a reflexive tool that serves as ‘the drawing board ‘to sketch out ‘more apt or interesting “designs for living”.’3 Informed by Turner ‘approach to theatre, this essay discusses contemporary theatre in Bangladesh with the following objectives: (i) to examine the terrain as a representation of performance in non-theatrical contexts that are ‘designed to maintain, modify, or overturn the existing social order;’4 and (ii) to scrutinize it as an insidious and invisible politico-aesthetic tool, which operates in the liminality of theatrical contexts ‘outside or on the periphery of everyday life’5 and seeks to reinstate or resist the performances in non- theatrical contexts by deploying the ‘imaginary ‘as a metacommentary on the ‘real. ‘The essay limits itself to the time-frame of the ‘contemporary’, an indicator that will bracket within itself the tumultuous years immediately preceding the independence of Bangladesh in 1971 at one end, and the immediate past or the first decade of the current century, at the other. It proceeds in three parts, each of which focuses on one of the following nodes: (i) narration of the nation entangled in contesting identities inscribed by language, religion, and ethnicity; (ii) mobilization of subaltern resistance against hegemony of the state and its elite patrons; and (iii) replications and transgressions in the performativity of gender.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and references
Victor Turner, From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play (New York: Performance Arts Journal Publication, 1982), 76–7.
Victor Turner, From Ritual to Theatre, 13.
Victor Turner, From Ritual to Theatre, 24.
Richard Schechner, Performance Studies: An Introduction (London: Routledge, 2002), 68.
Victor Turner, Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1974), 47.
Mamtaz Uddin Ahmad, ‘Munir Chowdhurir Kabar,’ Theatre 5.1 (1977), 141. 137–49. Dhananjaya Dash, Āmär Janmabh ümi: Smrtimay Bangladesh (Kolkata: Muktadhara, 1971), 74.
Badruddin Umar, ‘Language Movement,’ in Sirajul Islam, ed., History of Bangladesh 1704–1971, Vol. 1, Political History (Dhaka: Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, 1992), 437. 422–61.
Mamtaz Uddin Ahmad, ‘Munir Chowdhurir Kabar,’ Theatre 5.1, 141. Dhananjaya Dash, Ämär Janmabh ümi: Smrtimay Bangladesh, 74.
Piene Macherey, A Theory of Literary Production, trans. Geoffrey Wall (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978), 84.
Victor Turner, From Ritual to Theatre, 75.
Homi K. Bhabha, ‘Introduction: Narrating the Nation,’ in Homi K. Bhabha, ed., Nation and Narration (London: Routledge, 1990), 1. 1–7.
Homi K. Bhabha, 2.
Rehman Sobhan, ‘Economic Basis of Bengali Nationalism,’ in Sirajul Islam, ed., History of Bangladesh 1704–1971: Vol, 2, Economic History, 709–10. 706–80.
Mahmud Shah Qureshi, ‘Literary Assessments of Tagore by Bengali Muslim Writers,’ University of Toronto Quarterly 77: 4 (2008), 1144. 1133–52.
A theatre group founded by Ramendu Majumdar, a theatre artist of international repute.
Willem van Schendel, ‘Who Speaks for the Nation? Nationalist Rhetoric and the Challenge of Cultural Pluralism in Bangladesh,’ in Willem van Schendel and Erik Jan Z ürcher, eds., Identity Politics in Central Asia and the Muslim World: Nationalism, Ethnicity and Labour in the Twentieth Century (London: LB. Tauris, 2001), 108. 107–47.
Victor Turner, From Ritual to Theatre, 12.
Victor Turner, From Ritual to Theatre, 76.
Although not directly related to the Indian Theatre of Roots, Selim al Deen ‘plays and the theatre idiom that they produced in performance may be said to belong to a pan-Asian trend. According to Suresh Awasthi, “Theatre of Roots ‘developed in India in the mid-1950s ‘as a result of modern theatre ‘encounter with tradition ‘and was ‘inspired by a search for roots and a quest for identity ‘(‘“Theatre of Roots:” Encounter with Tradition,’ The Drama Review 33. 4 (1988): 48–69). He also argues that the search for ‘roots ‘was pan-Asian in character. About the same time as in India, directors in Sri Lanka, Indonesia, South Korea, and Japan began to seek ‘liberation from Western realistic theatre ‘and, ‘by utilizing the rich theatrical heritage of their respective countries, evolved a style in tune with indigenous values and aesthetics ‘(Awasthi 1988: 48–9).
Helen Gilbert, ‘General Introduction,’ in Helen Gilbert, ed., Postcolonial Plays: An Anthology (New York: Routledge, 2001), 1. 1–7.
Rabindranath Tagore, Nationalism (London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd., 1918), 16.
Nagorik, Program Note to Tagore ‘Achaläyatan, published on the occasion of the play ‘premiere (Dhaka: Nagorik Natya Sampraday, 1980), author ‘translation, n.p.
Muthal Naidoo, ‘The Search for a Cultural Identity: A Personal View of South African “Indian” Theatre,’ Theatre Journal 49.1 (1997), 34, fn 13. 29–39.
Syed Shamsul Haq, ‘Raktakarabï Ekhan,’ in the brochure published on the occasion of the premiere of Nagorik ‘production of Raktakarabi (Dhaka: Nagorik, 2001), author ‘translation, n.p.
Mofidul Hoque, ‘Bangladesh,’ in Ramendu Majumdar, et al. eds., The World of Theatre (Dhaka: Bangladesh Centre of the International Theatre Institute, 2004), 24.
Mohammad Abdul Awwal, ‘Bisäd-Sindhu,’ in Sirajul Islam ed., Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh, Vol. 2 (Dhaka: Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, 2003), 228. 227–8.
The root of the schism goes back to the question of succession after the death of the Prophet in AD. 632. Some believed that Ali (the Prophet ‘cousin and husband of his daughter Fatima) was the rightful and legitimate heir to the Islamic caliphate. However, Ali had to wait his turn because three other companions of the Prophet — Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman — succeeded the Prophet one after another. His reign as the fourth caliph was short-lived, for he was murdered in 661. Mu’awiya succeeded him and the capital was shifted from Medina to Damascus. Mu’awiya’ succession marks the beginning of the Umayyad dynasty and the shift of the Islamic state from theocracy to autocracy. His succession also marks the intensification of a schism in the Muslim community because Ali’ son Hasan claimed the caliphate. Eventually he abdicated in favor of Mu’awiya but reserved the right to succession (after Mu’awiya ‘death) for himself. However, Hasan was poisoned through Mu’awiya’ son Yazid ‘conspiracy in 669. After his brother ‘death, Hosain persisted in his efforts to claim the caliphate. Offered support by the people of Kufah (a city near Baghdad), Hosain set out with his family and a group of followers for the city, hoping to fight Yazid. However, before Hosain could anive, Yazid ‘men had captured the city. Vastly outnumbered, Hosain and his men lay in a state of siege on the plains of Karbala (north of Kufah), cut off from any source of water for ten days. A battle was fought on the 10th of Muharram (October 10, 680), in which Hosain lost all his men and was himself killed. Hosain ‘martyrdom at Karbala gave rise to the Shi’ah sect (literally, ‘the partisans’, here ‘the partisans of Ali’).
Meghna Guhathakurta, ‘The Representation and Characterization of Women in Contemporary Theatre: The Case of Bishad Shindhu,’ in Firdaus Azim and Niaz Zaman eds., Infinite Variety: Women in Society and Literature (Dhaka: University Press Limited, 1994), 289. 283–93.
Nirad C. Chaudhuri, The Autobiography of an Unknown Indian (London: Macmillan & Co, 1951), 231.
Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay (1838–1894) is a most renowned nineteenth-century Bengali novelist and the author of Vande Matarm whose first two verses were given the official status of the ‘national song ‘of the Republic of India in 1950.
Partha Chatterjee, ‘National History and Its Exclusions,’ in John Hutchinson and Anthony D. Smith, eds., Nationalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 209–14.
Meghna Guhathakurta, ‘The Representation and Characterization of Women in Contemporary Theatre,’ 289. 283–93.
Homi K. Bhabha, ‘Introduction: Nanating the Nation,’ 4. 1–7.
Homi K. Bhabha, The Location of Culture (London: Routledge, 1994), 147.
Mesbah Kamal, ‘Introduction,’ in Mesbah Kamal, et al., eds., Indigenous Communities, Cultural Survey of Bangladesh Series 5 (Dhaka: Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, 2007), xxiii-xxxi. xi-xxxv.
BANBEIS (Bangladesh Bureau of Educational Information and Statistics), Bangladesh: Country Profile 2006, retrieved 3 June 2011 from http://www.banbeis.gov.bd/bd_pro.htm
Gilles Deleuze, Difference and Repetition, trans. Paul Patton (London: Continuum, 2005), 97.
Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Brian Massumi (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), 15.
B. K. Jahangir, Differentiation, Polarisation and Confrontation in Rural Bangladesh (Dhaka: Centre for Social Studies, 1979), 17.
Badruddin Umar, Bänglädeshe Communist Andolaner Samasyā (Problems of Communist Movement in Bangladesh) (Dhaka: Muktadhara, 1983 [1975]), 7–8.
The phrases are Victor Turner ‘(Ritual to Theatre, 76–7).
Badruddin Umar, 10–11.
Sayeed Ahmad, Three Plays: The Thing, the Milepost, Survival (Dhaka: Bangla Academy, 1979), 31–77.
Mesbah Kamal and Arifatul Kibria, ‘Mass Upsurge, 1969,’ in Sirajul Islam, ed., Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh, Vol. 6, 432. 432–4.
Mesbah Kamal and Arifatul Kibria, ‘Mass Upsurge, 1969,’ 432, 434.
Sukumar Biswas, Bānglādesher Nätyacharcha O Nātaker Dhä8;rä (Dhaka: Bangla Academy, 1988), 367–8, 402–3.
Sukumar Biswas, Bänglädesher Nätyacharcha O Nätaker Dhärä, 368.
Amritaranjan Dey, Nätk O Sangräme (Udïchï, 2010), an unpublished paper.
B.K. Jahangir, Nationalism, Fundamentalism and Democracy in Bangladesh (Dhaka: International Centre for Bengal Studies, 2002), 43.
B.K. Jahangir, Nationalism, Fundamentalism and Democracy in Bangladesh, 20–6; Badruddin Umar, Bänglädeshe Communist Āndolaner Samasyā, 18–19.
Mohiuddin Alamgir, Famine in South Asia: Political Economy of Mass Starvation (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain Publishers Inc, 1980), 143.
Group Theatre is a mode of theatre production, which being neither professional nor commercial, experiments in theme and style with a view to highlighting social messages. In post-Independence Bangladesh young artists formed theatre groups to represent the values and ideals of the Liberation War through their productions often inspired by the group theatre movement in Kolkata during the 1940s and even later.
B.K. Jahangir, Nationalism, Fundamentalism and Democracy in Bangladesh, 36–7.
Rahman Chowdhury, ‘Bānglādeshe Bigata Panchāsh Bachharer Nātyacharchā (Theatre Practice in Bangladesh in the Past Fifty Years),’ Bangladesh Asiatic Society Patrikā 20. 2 (2002), 41, 45–6. 23–68.
B.K. Jahangir, Nationalism, Fundamentalism and Democracy in Bangladesh, 45.
Syed Shamsul Haq, ‘N üraldmer Säräjiban,’ in Syed Shamsul Haq and Rashid Haider, eds., Shatabarser NĀtak, Vol. 2 (Dhaka: Bangla Academy, 1994), 571. 565–648.
Syed Shamsul Haq, ‘N üraldmer Sārājiban,’ 648.
Rashid in Sandhani, ‘Mukhomukhi: Mamunur Rashid ‘(an interview with Mamunur Rashid in Bengali), in Asish Goswami, ed., Āranyak: Ekti Natyadaler Kathā (Dhaka: Aranyak, 2001 [1981]), author ‘translation, 140. 140–2.
Antonio Gramsci, ‘The Intellectuals,’ in Quintin Hoare and Geofrey Nowell Smith, eds, Selections from Prison Notebooks (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1971), 6.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections from Prison Notebooks, 6.
Kees S. Epskamp, Theatre in Search of Social Change: The Relative Significance of Different Theatrical Approaches, CESO Paperback no. 7 (The Hague: CESO, 1989), 157.
Hussian Muhammad Ershad is a former military dictator and President of Bangladesh, and is currently the Chairman of Jatiya Party.
Israfil Shaeen, ‘Pathanātak ‘[Street Theatre], in Israfil Shaeen, ed., Paribeshanā Shilpakalā [Performing Arts], Cultural Survey of Bangladesh Series, Vol. 12 (Dhaka: Asiatic Society, 2007), 335–58. 332–64.
‘Trail of Terror Attacks, ‘The Daily Star 31 March 2007, 1.
Julfikar Ali Manik and Shamim Ashraf, ‘Tyrant Bangla Bhai Finally Captured,’ The Daily Star 7 Mar 2006, retrieved 4 June 2013 from http://archive.thedailystar.net/2006/03/07/d6030701011.htm
S.R. Osmani, The Impact of Globalizationon: Poverty in Bangladesh (Geneva: International Labour Office, 2005), 1.
Yasmeen Murshed and Nazim Kamran Choudhury, ‘Bangladesh’ second Chance, ‘Journal of Democracy 8.1 (1997), 71. 70–82.
Syed Jamil Ahmed, Acinpākhi Infinity: Indigenous Theatre of Bangladesh (Dhaka: University Press Limited, 2000), 120–5.
Bijay Gupta, Padmā-purān, edited by Jayantakumar Dāsgupta (Calcutta: Calcutta University, 1962), 121–45.
Jahanara Imam, ‘Nātake Mahilā Shilpï,’in Dhaka Mahânagarï Nātyacharchā (Dhaka: Bangladesh Shilpakalā Academy, 1992), 65.
Sonia Nishat Amin, ‘Women and Society ‘in Sirajul Islam, ed., History of Bangladesh 1704–1971, Vol. 3, Social and Cultural History, 759. 718–59.
Maleka Begum, Banglar Nari Andolon (Dhaka: The University Press Ltd., 1989), 134.
Judith Butler, ‘Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory,’ Theatre Journal 40. 4, 521. 519–31.
Judith Butler, ‘Performative Acts and Gender Constitution,’ 519.
Judith Butler, 528.
Judith Butler, 528.
Judith Butler, 528.
Shahida Begum, ‘Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961,’ in Sirajul Islam, ed., Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh, Volume 7 (Dhaka: Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, 2003), 169–70. 168–70.
Maleka Begum, Banglar Nari Andolon, 159.
Judith Butler, ‘Performative Acts and Gender Constitution,’ 525.
Maleka Begum, Banglar NariAndolon, 163.
Sayeeda Yasmin Saikia, ‘Beyond the Archive of Silence: Narratives of Violence of the 1971 Liberation War of Bangladesh,’History Workshop Journal 58 (2004), 281–2. 274–86.
Maleka Begum, Banglar Nari Andolon, 163.
Firdous Azim, response to questions following the presentation of a paper titled ‘Woman in Theatre: In Dramatic Text,’ in Shaft Ahmed, ed., International Seminar on Women in Theatre (Dhaka: Bangladesh Centre of ITI, 1997), 55.51-60.
Sayeeda Yasmin Saikia, ‘Beyond the Archive of Silence,’ 285–6.
Sayeeda Yasmin Saikia, 286.
Firdous Azim, ‘Introduction,’ in Firdous Azim and Maheen Sultan, eds., Mapping Women ‘Empowerment: Experiences from Bangladesh, India and Pakistan (Dhaka: The University Press Limited, 2010), 2. 1–8.
Firdous Azim, response to questions following the presentation of a paper titled ‘Woman in Theatre: In Dramatic Text,’ 54.
Firdous Azim, Response to questions, 58.
Slavoj Zizek, ‘With or Without Passion — What ‘Wrong with Fundamentalism? Part I,’ retrieved 11 May 2012 from http://www.lacan.com/zizpassion.htm 2005.
Such set props (or set properties) are the movable objects used in a theatre set that are not built into the set. Usually, the set props include chairs, tables, rugs, appliances, barrels, trunks, or large rocks.
Judith Butler, ‘Performative Acts and Gender Constitution,’ 528.
Saiyeda Khatun, “The representation of women in contemporary Bangladeshi literature: A new challenge in the postcolonial field,’ Diss., University of Rhode Island, retrieved 26 May 2012 from http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dissertations/AAI9831107 1997.
Judith Butler,’ Performative Acts and Gender Constitution,’ 528.
Badruddin Umar, ‘Bānglādeshe Nāh Andolan Prasange,’ in Badruddin Umar, ed., Nāri Prashna Prasange (Dhaka: Shraban Prakashani, 2003), 141.
Simeen Mahmud, ‘Our Bodies, Our Selves: The Bangladesh Perspective,’ in Firdous Azim and Maheen Sultan eds., Mapping Women ‘Empowerment: Experiences from Bangladesh, India and Pakistan, 199. 181–208.
Soumitra Chattapadhyay andNirmalya Acharya, ‘Editorial Note,’in Binodini Dasi, Ämār Kathā O Anyānya Racanā (Kolkata: Subarnarekha, 1376 [Bengali Era]), xiii. viii-xxvii.
They are three of the five women from the Hindu mythology, the other two being Arundhati and Savitri, who embody ideal/traditional Indian womanhood by virtue of their fidelity and self-effacing service to their husbands.
Believed to be an incarnation of Lord Krsna, Caitanya is a 16th-century Bengal-bom saint still worshipped in eastern India and present-day Bangladesh. He preached universal love, initiating a spiritual movement against the age-old barriers of casteism.
Ramakrishna, born Gadadhar Chattopadhyay, is a famous mystic of 19th-century Bengal/India who broke the barriers of orthodox Hinduism and preached the possibility of realizing God through multiple faiths. His chief disciple, Swami Vivekananda, founded the Ramakrishna Mission to propagate his thought and serve humanity.
Binodini Dasi, ‘ÄmārKathā,’ in Ämār Kathā O Anyānya Racanā (Kolkata: Subarnarekha, 1394 [Bengali Era]), author ‘translation, 43. 1–61.
Judith Butler, ‘Performative Acts and Gender Constitution’, 527.
Judith Butler, 519.
Girish Chandra Ghosh is a famous 19th-century playwright, director and actor whose play Caitanyalila, with Binodini in the role of Caitanya, was staged at the Star Theatre on 20 September 1884. Ramakrishna Paramahamsa came to watch the play.
For details, see Syed Jamil Ahmed, ‘Hegemony Resistance, and Subaltern Silence: Lessons from Indigenous Performances of Bangladesh,’ 70–86.
Homi K. Bhabha, The Location of Culture, 22.
Michael Kirby ‘On Political Theatre,’ TDR 19.2 (1975), 129. 129–35.
Honi Fern Haber, Beyond Postmodern Politics: Lyotard, Rorty, Foucault (New York: Routledge, 1994), 2.
Richard Schechner, Performance Studies: An Introduction, 68.
Victor Turner, (1990) ‘Are there universals of performance in myth, ritual, and drama?,’ in Richard Schechner and Willa Appel, eds., By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual (Cambridge, University of Cambridge, 1990), 17. 8–18.
Karl Marx, ‘The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte,’ in David McLellan, ed., Karl Marx: Selected Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977), 318.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Syed Jamil Ahmed
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ahmed, S.J. (2014). Designs of Living in the Contemporary Theatre of Bangladesh. In: Sengupta, A. (eds) Mapping South Asia through Contemporary Theatre. Studies in International Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137375148_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137375148_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47720-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37514-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Theatre & Performance CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)