Skip to main content

The Swiftly Moving Frontiers of Quality Assurance

  • Chapter
Quality Assurance in Higher Education

Part of the book series: Issues in Higher Education ((IHIGHER))

  • 384 Accesses

Abstract

The emergence of the evaluative state (Neave, 1998) can be explained as the consequence of a number of factors, including massification of higher education, increasing market regulation, the emergence of new public management and loss of trust in higher education institutions and their professionals.

… noui consilia et ueteres quaecumque moneatis amici,

‘pone seram, cohibe.’ sed quis custodiet ipsos

custodies, qui nunc lasciuae farta puellae

hac mercede silent? crimen commune tacetur.

prospicit hoc prudens et ab illis incipit uxor.

… I am aware of whatever councils you old friends warn:

‘Bolt her in, constrain her!’ But who will guard

the guardians , who now keep silent the lapses of the loose

girl — paid off in the same coin? The common crime keeps its silence.

A prudent wife looks ahead and starts with them.

(Juvenal or Juvenalis, VI satire)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, L. (2008) United States Senate, Press release, 30 January, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A. (2008) Quality Assurance: Role, legitimacy, responsibilities and means of public authorities. In Weber, L. and Dolgova-Dreyer (eds), The legitimacy of quality assurance in higher education (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Higher Education Series No. 9), pp. 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A. and Neave, G. (2009) ‘On Bologna, Weasels and Creeping Competence’, in A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin and P.A.M. Maassen (eds), European Integration and Governance of Higher Education and Research (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 281–99.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A. and Rosa, M.J. (2004) ‘Portugal: Professional and Academic Accreditation — The Impossible Marriage?’, in Schwarz, S. and Westerheijden, D. (eds), Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press), pp. 127–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biagi, M. (2000) ‘The Impact of European Employment Strategy on the Role of Labour Law and Industrial Relations’, International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 16(2), 155–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (2001) Management Fads in Higher Education (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS (2011) Higher Education. Students at the Heart of the System (London: Stationery Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehousse, R. (2002) ‘The Open Method of Coordination: A New Policy Paradigm?’ Paper presented at the First Pan-European Conference on European Union Politics, The Politics of European Integration: Academic Acquis and Future Challenges, Bordeaux, 26–28 September 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J.S. (2007) ‘Institutions, accreditors, and the federal government: Redefining their appropriate relationship’, Change, Vol. 39(5), 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009) Report on Progress in Quality Assurance in Higher Education (COM (2009) 487 final) (Brussels: European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • Futures Project (2001) Final Report of ‘Privileges Lost, Responsibilities Gained: Reconstructing Higher Education’, A Global Symposium in the Future of Higher Education, New York, Columbia University Teachers College, 14–15 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (2006) ‘Understanding Quality’, in E. Froment, J. Kohler, L. Purser and L. Wilson (eds), EUA Bologna Handbook: Making Bologna Work, Berlin, B 4.1.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. and Newton, J. (2006) ‘Transforming Quality Evaluation: Moving On’, in D. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker and M.J. Rosa (eds), Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 225–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A. (2002) ‘The Self-transformation of the European Social Model(s)’, http://www.eucenter.wisc.edu/OMC/Papers/Hemerijck.pdf (accessed 22 September 2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Högskolverket (2005) The Evaluation Activities of the National Agency for Higher Education in Sweden. Final Report by the International Advisory Board. 38R. (Stockholm: Högskolverket).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeliaskova, M. (2001) ‘Running the Maze: Interpreting External Reviews Recommendations’, Quality in Higher Education, 8(1), 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, J., Huber, J. and Bergan, S. (2006) Higher Education Governance between Democratic Culture, Academic Aspirations and Market Forces (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Higher Education Series No. 5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kröger, S. (2004) ‘Let’s Talk about It — Theorizing the OMC (Inclusion) in Light of Its Real Life Application’. Paper presented at the doctoral meeting of the Jean Monnet chair of the Institut d’Études Politiques in Paris, section ‘Public Policies in Europe’, Paris, 11 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughton, D. (2003) ‘Why Was the QAA Approach to Teaching Quality Assessment Rejected by Academics in UK HE?’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(3), 309–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1994) ‘The Policies of Quality: Development in higher education in Western Europe 1992–1994’, European Journal of Education, 29(2), 115–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1998) ‘The Evaluative State Reconsidered’, European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2004), ‘The Bologna Process and the Evaluative State: A Viticultural Parable’, in Managerialism and Evaluation in Higher Education, UNESCO Forum Occasional Paper Series, no. 7, Paris, November 2004 (ED-2006/WS/47), pp. 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J.H. (1996) in F. Turner (ed.), The Idea of the University, Defined and Illustrated, Rethinking the Western Tradition (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, J. (2000) ‘Feeding the Beast or Improving Quality? Academics’ Perceptions of Quality Assurance and Quality Monitoring’, Quality in Higher Education, 6(2), 153–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009) Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raban, C., Gower, B., Martin, J., Stoney, C., Timms, D., Tinsley, R. and Turner, E. (2005) ‘Risk Management Report’, http://www.edgehill.ac.uk/aqdu/files/2012/08/QualityRiskManagementReport.pdf (accessed 22 September 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. (2003) The Open Method of Coordination: A New Governance Architecture for the European Union? (Stockholm: The Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Velarde, K. and Hopbach, A. (2007) ‘From Transnational Co-operation to National Implementation’, in Hochschulrektorenkonferenz (ed.), The Quality Assurance System for Higher Education at European and National Level. Bologna Seminar Berlin, 15–16 February 2007, pp. 29–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1996) ‘Trust, Markets and Accountability in Higher Education: A Comparative Perspective’, Higher Education Policy, 9(4), 309–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trubek, D.M. and Trubek, L.G. (2005) ‘Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of Social Europe: The Role of the Open Method of Co-ordination’. European Law Journal, 11(3), 343–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Brueggen, J.C., Scheele, J. and Westerheijden, D. (1998) ‘To be Continued … Synthesis and Trends’, in J. Scheele, P. Maassen and D. Westerheijden (eds), To Be Continued: Follow Up of Quality Assurance in Higher Education (Maassen: Elsevier/de Tijdstroom), pp. 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme (2004) ‘Quality Assurance and Accreditation in the Flemish Community of Belgium’, in S. Schwarz and D. Westerheijden (eds), Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press), pp. 127–57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, A. and Amaral, A. (2009) ‘Policy Implementation Tools and European Governance’, in A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin and P.A.M. Maassen (eds), European Integration and Governance of Higher Education and Research (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 127–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L. and Bergan, S. (eds) (2005) The Public Responsibility for Higher Education and Research (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Higher Education Series No. 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yelland, R. (2008) ‘OECD Initiative on Assessing Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO)’, International Association of Universities Conference, Utrecht, 18 July.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Alberto Amaral and Maria João Rosa

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amaral, A., Rosa, M.J. (2014). The Swiftly Moving Frontiers of Quality Assurance. In: Rosa, M.J., Amaral, A. (eds) Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Issues in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137374639_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics