Skip to main content

Curriculum Studies and Curriculum Reform in China

1922–2012

  • Chapter
Curriculum Studies in China

Part of the book series: International and Development Education ((INTDE))

  • 392 Accesses

Abstract

Curriculum studies includes curriculum history. Curriculum history is the unfolding development of curriculum studies. For any curriculum field in any nation, theoretical construction and historical perspectives are integrated. In China, with its long history of wisdom traditions for more than 2,500 years, a historical focus is a natural character of Chinese curriculum field (H. Zhang and Zhong 2003). To understand the Chinese curriculum field, it is necessary to inquire into Chinese curriculum history. In the construction of Chinese curriculum studies, we need to critically examine the wisdom traditions and historical situations in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alitto, Guy S. 1979. The Last Confucian: Liang Shu-Ming and the Chinese Dilemma of Modernity. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alitto, Guy S., and Shuming Liang. 2006. Has Man a Future? An Interview with Late Liang Shuming. Shanghai: Oriental Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbitt, John Franklin. 1918. The Curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. http://archive.org/details/curriculum00bobbgoog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonser, Frederick Gordon. 1920. The Elementary School Curriculum. New York, Macmillan. http://archive.org/details/elementaryschool00bonsuoft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charters, Werrett Wallace. 1924. Curriculum Construction. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Wenhua. 2011. “A Study on Laozi’s Educational Thought.” Unpublished PhD dissertation, Jinan: Shandong Normal University, Faculty of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Xia. 1944. The Developing History of the Elementary School Curriculum in Modern China. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. Curriculum Theory. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Yuting. 2006. “The Autobiographical Method in Teacher Education: Research on William F. Pinar’s Theory of Currere.” Unpublished PhD dissertation, Shanghai: East China Normal University, Department of Curriculum and Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Xiangfan. 1923. An Introduction to the Elementary School Curriculum. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Yunhuo. 2000. School-Based Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Botao. 1981. “On the Importance of School Curriculum Research.” Curriculum, Subject Matters and Teaching Method 1 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, William E. 1993. A Post-Modern Perspective on Curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Yaqiao. 2011. “The Post-Modern Turn of Confucian Thought of Curriculum.” Unpublished PhD dissertation, Chongqing, China: Southwest University, Department of Curriculum and Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, Paulo. 1968. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, Michael. 1993. Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. London: Routlege Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Fang. 2009. “A Report on the Influence of Chinese Education Scholars and Educational Works: Based on the Statistics of CSSCI Journals during 2005–2006.” Fudan Education Forum 7 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Fang, and Yun Bai. 2006. “A Research Report on Chinese ‘Pedagogy’ during 2000–2004: Based on the Influence Analysis of CSSCI Papers and Books.” Research in Education Development 28 (10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieder, Jerome B. 1970. Hu Shih and the Chinese Renaissance: Liberalism in the Chinese Revolution, 1917–1937. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harap, Henry. 1928. The Technique of Curriculum Making. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Shih. 1921. The Collected Works of Hu Shih: Philosophy and Culture. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1926. “The Renaissance in China.” Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs 5 (Nov.): 266–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1934. The Chinese Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://www.UNZ.org/Pub/HuShih-1934?View=Search.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Ji, and Xiaoyan Wang. 2011. “Historical Experience and Teaching Reform: Commenting on Teaching Methodology of Kairov’s Pedagogy.” Educational Research 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Yule. 1995. Modern Curriculum Theory. Chongqing, China: Southwest Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kairov, Ivan Andreyevich, ed. 1951. Pedagogy. Translated by Ying Shen and Zhishan Nan. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Barry C. 1977. The Dewey Experiment in China: Educational Reform and Political Power in the Early Republic. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University. Distributed by Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Baoqing, and Yule Jin. 2005. “A Taoist Perspective on Curriculum Reform.” Educational Research 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Lianfang. 1934. The Integrated Curriculum for Early Elementary Schools. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yanbing. 2002. The Theory of Curriculum Evaluation. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2011. “On the Essence of Assessment for Integrated Qualities.” Research in Education Development 33 (24).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Shuming. 1921. Eastern-Western Cultures and Their Philosophies. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1933. “The Daft Plan of Society-Based Educational System.” In The Complete Works of Liang Shuming. Vol. 5. Jinan: Shandong People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Zhexu. 1991. Curriculum Studies. Wuhan: Central China Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Hui. 2009. Investigations on Teaching Tact. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Lianghua. 2011. Narrative Pedagogy. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Wanhai. 2009. On the Virtue of Teaching. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2011. “Using Good Means to Attain Good Aims: The Confucian Perspective on the Virtue of Teaching.” Global Education 40 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv, Da. 1994. The History of Modern Curriculum in China. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999. On Curriculum History. Beijing: People’s Educational Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Yunpeng. 2001. Exploring Curriculum Implementation: A Case Study on the Implementation of Mathematics Curriculum in Elementary Schools. Changchun, China: Northeast Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manen, Max Van. 1991. The Tact of Teaching: The Meaning of Pedagogical Thoughtfulness. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Second edition. Ontario: The Althouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Ministry of Education. 2001. “The Guidelines for Curriculum Reform of Basic Education (Try-out Version).”

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning, Hong. 2011. “How to Acquire Knowledge: Research on Phenomenological Pedagogy.” Educational Research 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, William F., ed. 2000. Curriculum Studies: The Reconceptualization. New York: Educator’s International Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2006. The Synoptic Text Today and Other Essays. Curriculum Development after the Reconceptualization. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2007. Intellectual Advancement Through Disciplinarity: Verticality and Horizontality in Curriculum Studies. Rotterdam and Taipei: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, William F, William M. Reynolds, Patrich Slattery, and Peter M. Taubman. 1995. Understanding Curriculum: An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Curriculum Discourses. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Mu. 2004. Culture and Education. Guilin, China: Guangxi Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, Manabu. 2003. Curriculum and Teachers. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarcz, Vera. 1986. The Chinese Enlightenment: Intellectuals and the Legacy of the May Fourth Movement of 1919. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Zishan. 1924. “The Issues of the Elementary School Curriculum.” Circle of China’s Education 14 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, Langxi. 1934. The Evolvement of the Elementary School Curriculum. Beijing: China’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Guoya. 1984. “On the Research Scope and Guiding Principles of Curriculum Studies.” Shanxi Educational Research Letter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Liangfang. 1996. Curriculum Theory: Foundations, Principles, and Problems of Curriculum. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David Geoffrey. 1999. Pedagon: Interdisciplinary Essays in the Human Sciences, Pedagogy, and Culture. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Special Commentator. 1978. “Practice Is the Only Standard to Test Truth.” Guangming Daily, May 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Weizhi. 2006. “Schooling Should Pay Attention to ‘Education without Saying’: My Ideas on Zhuangzi’s Teaching Thought.” Contemporary Educational Science 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Yijie. 2006. My Way to Explore Philosophy. Beijing: Xinhua Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Xingzhi. 1991a. The Complete Works of Tao Xingzhi. Vol. 1. Chengdu, China: Sichuan Education Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991b. The Complete Works of Tao Xingzhi. Vol. 2. Chengdu, China: Sichuan Education Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Cesan. 1985. On Instruction. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —., ed. 2002. Instructional Epistemology. Beijing: Beijing Normal University.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004. “A Critical Reflection on the Thought of ‘Despising Knowledge’ in Chinese Basic Education.” Peking University Education Review 2 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2006. “The Debate on the ‘Direction’ of Curriculum Reform.” Journal of Educational Studies 2 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008. “‘The New Curriculum Ideas,’ ‘Reconceptualization,’ and Learning from Kairov’s Pedagogy.” Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method 28 (7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Keren. 1928. The Principles and Methods of Curriculum Construction. Guangxi: Editing and Translating Office of Guangxi Educational Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Wenli. 2006. “A Comparative Study on Zhuangzi and J. Rousseau’s Views of Natural Education.” Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University Educational Science 19 (12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Xia. 2003. Curriculum Inquiry: Modernism and Post-Modernism. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Yuxun. 2003. On Confucius’ Thought of Teaching. Changchun, China: Changchun Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Zhengdong. 2011. “On Evolvement of Teacher-Students Relationships in the Transformation of Confucianism.” Unpublished PhD dissertation, Shanghai: East China Normal University, Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Gangping. 2002. School-Based Curriculum Development. Chengdu, China: Sichuan Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, Chengdi. 1996. Research on School Subject Matters in Ancient China. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, Zirong. 1934. The Principles of Curriculum Construction. Shanghai: The Commercial Press, Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Dehua. 2003. “Zhuangzi’s Teaching Thought.” Research in Teaching 26 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Xun, and Liangfang Shi, ed. 1988. The Collected Works of Pedagogy: On Teaching. Vol. 1. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Yuzhen. 2003. The Theories and Examples of School-Based Curriculum Development. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2009. “School-Based Teacher Development through a Collaborative Project.” Journal of Curriculum Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Zhi. 1929. The Evolving History of Chinese School Curriculum. Shanghai: Pacific Ocean Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Dawei. 2008. “A Study on Different Fates of Kairov’s Pedagogy in Soviet Union and China.” Unpublished PhD dissertation, Shanghai: East China Normal University, Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2009. “On the End of Kairov’s Pedagogy: Also on Kairov’s Self-Criticism and the Return of Humanism.” Global Education 38 (9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Qiliang. 2001. “On Taoist View of Naturalist Education in Pre-Qin Dynasty.” Journal of Nanjing Normal University Social Science 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. “A Comparative Study on the Teaching Traditions of Confucianism, Taoism, and Mohism and Its Implications to Modern Teaching.” Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science) 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Qiliang. 2010. “On the Indigenous Study on Teaching Theory in China: Some Implications from Taoist Idea of ‘Production-Reduction.’” Educational Research and Experiment 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2010. Research on Mencius’ Educational Thought. Beijing: Capital Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Ying-shih. 1993. “The Radicalization of China in the Twentieth Century.” Daedalus 122 (2): 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004. “Neither Renaissance Nor Enlightenment: A Historian’s Reflections on the May Fourth Movement.” In Re-Seeking Hu Shih’s Experience: The Re-Thinking of Hu Shih’s Thought and Life, edited by Ying-shih Yu. Guilin, China: Guangxi Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2005. Modern Crisis and Thinkers in China. Beijing: SDX Joint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Hua. 2000. The Theory of Curriculum and Teaching. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. The Theory of Experience Curriculum. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2005. “On the Essence of Pedagogical Knowledge.” Global Education 34 (6).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2007. Research on Integrated Curriculum of Practical Activities. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008a. “Dialogical Teaching: It’s Meanings and Values.” Global Education 37 (6).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008b. “On the Knowledge Issue in Teaching.” Global Education 37 (11).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008c. “Toward a Confucian Vision of Curriculum.” In Cross-Cultural Studies in Curriculum: Eastern Thought, Educational Insights, edited by Claudia Eppert and Hongyu Wang, 335–347. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2009a. “On the Knowledge Foundation of Dialogical Teaching.” Global Education 38 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2009b. “The Ongoing Curriculum Reform in China: Philosophy, Objectives, and Structure.” In International Conversations on Curriculum Studies: Subjects, Society, and Curriculum, edited by Eero Ropo and Tero Autio, 428. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2009c. “The Universalized Teaching Methodology in China: Reflections and Transcendence.” Global Education 38 (9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Hua, and Qiquan Zhong. 2003. “Curriculum Studies in China: Retrospect and Prospect.” In International Handbook of Curriculum Research, edited by William F Pinar. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Hua, and Guiqing An. 2008. Curriculum Development and Case Study on Integrated Curriculum of Practical Activities. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Hua, Weiping Shi, and Qingfa Ma. 2000. Research on the Schools of Curriculum Theories. Jinan, China: Shandong Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Hua, and Yanbing Li. 2004. The Ideals and Realities of Project-Based Learning. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Tingkai. 1998. “A Historical Retrospect on Curriculum Studies in China: 1922–1997 Part I.” Curriculum, Subject Matters and Teaching Method 18 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Wenjun. 1999. Toward Post-Modern Education. Taiwan: Mingzhi Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Shuchao. 2009. “Research on Zhu Xi’s Curriculum Thought: In Vision of Curriculum Wisdom.” Unpublished MA dissertation, Shanghai: East China Normal University, Department of Curriculum and Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Tingwei. 1924. “Reconstructing Curriculum.” Journal of Education 16 (8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Tingyang. 2005. All-Under-Heaven System: An Introduction to World System Philosophy. Nanjing, China: Jiangsu Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, Qiquan. 1989. Modern Curriculum Theory. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2005. Modern Curriculum Theory New Edition. Taiwan: Taiwan Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2006. “What Are the Social Responsibilities of Curriculum Persons.” Global Education 35 (9).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2009. “Critique of Kairov’s Pedagogy: Also Commenting on ‘Complex of Kairov’s Pedagogy.’” Global Education 38 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, Qiquan, and Baohua You. 2004. “The Mouldy Cheese: Thoughts on Reading A Critical Reflection on the Thought of ‘Despising Knowledge.’” Global Education 33 (10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, Qiquan, Yunhuo Cui, and Hua Zhang. 2001. For Chinese People’s Rejuvenation and Every Student’s Development: Interpretations of The Guidelines for Curriculum Reform of Basic Education. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Muju. 2002. Toward New Curriculum: Having Dialogue with Curriculum Implementers. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

William F. Pinar

Copyright information

© 2014 William F. Pinar

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hua, Z. (2014). Curriculum Studies and Curriculum Reform in China. In: Pinar, W.F. (eds) Curriculum Studies in China. International and Development Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137374295_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics