Skip to main content

Spatial Form and the Pathologies of Public Reason: Toward a Critical Theory of Space

  • Chapter
Re-Imagining Public Space
  • 517 Accesses

Abstract

At the heart of critical theory is the examination of forms of consciousness and their relation to the social structures patterned by administrative-capitalist logics. The pathologies that plague mass societies are seen to be expressions of specific forms of life that lead to alienated or reified forms of consciousness that actively distract subjects from a critical confrontation with the constellations of power that constitute their social world. Underlying this research program was a tacit acceptance of a causal relation between the sociostructural domain of human life—of economic logics, of the imperatives of rationalized institutions, and so on—on the one hand and the content of subjective mental states, powers of cognition, experience, and the “lifeworld” on the other. This was at the heart of what we could call the classical paradigm of critical theory where Marxian insights of political economy, in one form or the other, were accepted as a basis from which to theorize the pathologies of consciousness. But this has been gradually displaced by currents in contemporary critical theory which have advocated the thesis that the basis of an emancipatory consciousness and praxis lies hidden within the rhythms of everyday life. Whether this is seen to be the structures of language and communication and everyday speech acts, or the intersubjective and recognitive relations that lead to a critical awareness of social injustices, the dominant approach that has concerned these theorists and their followers has been a pragmatist-inspired critique of Marxist and idealist ideas that predominated the classical paradigm of critical theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bottero, W., and K. Prandy. 2003. “Social Interaction, Distance and Stratification.” British Journal of Sociology 54, no. 2: 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985. “The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups.” Theory and Society 14: 723–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choldin, H. 1978. “Social Life and the Physical Environment.” In Handbook of Contemporary Urban Life, ed. D. Street et al. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chombart de Lauwe, P.-H. 1956. Famille et habitation. Vol. 1, La vie quotidienne des familles ouvrières. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. 1986. Parades and Power: Street Theatre in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1959. Famille et habitation. Vol. 2, Scienes humaines et conceptions de l’habitation. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1960. “L’évolution des besoins et la conception dynamique de la famille.” Revue Française de Sociologie 1: 403–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deranty, J.-P. 2013. “Marx, Honneth and the Tasks of Contemporary Critical Theory.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16, no. 4: 745–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K. 1961. “On Social Communication and the Metropolis.” In The Future Metropolis, ed. Lloyd Rodwin. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, R. 1970. “The Cognitive Structure of an Urban Shopping Center.” Environment and Behavior 2: 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, R., and D. Stea. 1970. “From the Outside Looking in at the Inside Looking Out.” Environment and Behavior 2: 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1986. “Heterotopias.” Diacritics 16, no. 1: 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, N., and R. Golledge. 1982. “On the Subjective Partitioning of Space.” Annals of American Geographers 72, no. 1: 60–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, D. 1977. “The Social Organization of Space: Class, Cognition, and Residence in a Spanish Town.” American Ethnologist 4, no. 3: 437–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodsell, C. 1988. The Social Meaning of Civil Space: Studying Political Authority through Architecture. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 1987. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Conditions of Cultural Change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2006. Paris: Capital of Modernity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2009. Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. 1996. The Struggle for Recognition: A Grammar of Moral Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2008. Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketcham, R. 1987. Individualism and Public L fe: A Modern Dilemma. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kögler, H. 1997. “Alienation as Epistemological Source: Reflexivity and Social Background after Mannheim and Bourdieu.” Social Epistemology 11, no. 2: 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. 2003. Radical Space: Building the House of the People. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, L. 1998. The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, B. 1998. The Private Death of Public Discourse. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. 1982. “The Socio-Spatial Dialectics.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70: 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorre, M. 1957. Recontres de lagéographie et de la sociologie. Paris: Rivière.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. 2009a. “Democracy, Public Reason, and Suburban Life.” Monu: Magazine on Urbanism 2: 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2009b. “What Is Antiurbanism? A Theoretical Perspective.” In Fleeing the City: Studies in the Culture and Politics of Antiurbanism, ed. M. Thompson. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2011. “Talcott Parsons and the Logic of Critical Social Theory.” Situations 4, no. 2: 141–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2012. “The Suburban Origins of the Tea Party: The Spatial Origins of New Conservative Personality.” Critical Sociology 38, no. 4: 511–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonboe, J. 1986. “On the Political Importance of Space: The Socio-Spatial Relations of Trade Unions, Gender, and the Decentralized Danish Welfare State.” Acta Sociologica 29, no. 1: 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. 1981. “Localities, Regions and Social Class.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 5: 455–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Diana Boros James M. Glass

Copyright information

© 2014 Diana Boros and James M. Glass

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, M.J. (2014). Spatial Form and the Pathologies of Public Reason: Toward a Critical Theory of Space. In: Boros, D., Glass, J.M. (eds) Re-Imagining Public Space. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373311_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics