Skip to main content

#Occupytheestablishment The Commodification of a “New Sensibility” for Public Space and Public Life

  • Chapter
Re-Imagining Public Space
  • 525 Accesses

Abstract

The idea to occupy and re-imagine public space as political protest against an exclusionary and nontransparent democratic system was sparked in 2011 by the editors of Adbusters magazine and exploded into popular consciousness largely through the power of social media. The earliest moments of this collective praxis first disrupted Lower Manhattan, then, as quickly as wind sweeps across land, ignited city centers across America, and ultimately across the globe. For a brief period, the Occupy Wall Street (OWS/Occupy) movement represented the genuine promise of “hope and change” that many Americans had clung to following the 2008 global financial crisis. But like many social media phenomena, the movement’s physical visibility and accompanying popularity faded as rapidly as it had appeared. Fueled by a powerful statistic, that “1% of the Population owns 40% of the Wealth,”1 Occupy ignited deep-seated frustrations and began a profoundly needed conversation about income disparity with the provocative slogan, “We are the 99 percent.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • 2011.“Occupy Wall Street Invades Late Night.” October 19. Daily Beast. Retrieved from: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles.

  • 2011.True Life: I’m Occupying Wall Street. Retrieved from: http://www.mtv.com/video/news.

  • 2013.“You Are Not A Loan.” New Internationalist, no. 459 (January/February 2013). Retrieved from Ebscohost: Academic Search Premier. P.11–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carent, Neal, and Sarah Gaby. 2011. “Occupy Online: Facebook and the Spread of Occupy Wall Street.” Social Science Research Network, October 14, 2011, 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carne, Ross. 2012. “New Politics for a Disorderly World.” Nation, no. 9: 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2012. Occupy. Occupied Media Pamphlet Series. Brooklyn, NY: Zuccotti Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Amy. 2012. “Occupy Wall Street.” Harvard International Review 33, no. 4: 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidelberg, Paul. 1969. “The Temptation of Herbert Marcuse.” Review of Politics 4, no. 41. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1406593.

  • Featherstone, Lisa. 2012. “Caught in the Web: Occupy the Internet.” New Labor Forum: Murphy Institute 21, no. 2, 109–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, James K. 2008. The Predator State: How Conservatives Abandoned the Free Market and Why Liberals Should Too. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenham, David. 2001. “Norman O. Brown, Herbert Marcuse and the Romantic Tradition.” University of Nottingham: Doctorates in Philosophy (October). Retrieved from http://etheses.nottingham.ac.uk/2165/1/391426vol1.pdf

  • Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor Adorno. 1944. Dialectic of the Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hruby, Patrick. 2011. “Satirists Mock OWS: Protest Provides a Wealth of Material.” Washington Times, October 14. Retrieved from http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011.

  • Kellner, Douglas. 1991. Introduction to One-Dimensional Man, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchick, James. 2012. “Over There.” World Affairs 174, no. 5: 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Margaret. 2013. “Privatization and Protest: Occupy Wall Street, Occupy Toronto, and the Occupation of Public Space in a Democracy.” Perspectives on Politics 11, no. 1: 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, Alasdair. 1970. Herbert Marcuse: An Exposition and a Polemic. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-Dimensional Man. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert —. 1969. An Essay on Liberation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, Charles E. 1974. “The Frankfurt School.” History of Education 14, no. 4. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/368101.

  • Middlewood, Erin. 2012. “The Spark for Occupy Wall Street.” The Progressive 76, no. 3: 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, P. J. 2012. “Are the Peasants Revolting?” World Affairs 174, no. 5: 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam. 2010. Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, Kim. 2011. “The Audacity of Occupy Wall Street.” Nation 293, no. 21: 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, Edgar. 2011. “Occupy Wall Street Protestors Shut Down Law and Order: SVU Set Depicting OWS.” New York Daily News, December 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Nathan. 2011. “From Occupy Wall Street to Occupy Everywhere.” Nation, October 11, 1–5. Retrieved from http://www.thenation.com/article/162924.

  • Squidoo.com. “Occupy.” Retrieved from http://www.squidoo.com/occupy.

  • Tarrow, Sidney. 2011. “Why Occupy Wall Street Is Not the Tea Party of the Left.” Foreign Affairs 10 (October).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Diana Boros James M. Glass

Copyright information

© 2014 Diana Boros and James M. Glass

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boros, D., Smith, H. (2014). #Occupytheestablishment The Commodification of a “New Sensibility” for Public Space and Public Life. In: Boros, D., Glass, J.M. (eds) Re-Imagining Public Space. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373311_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics