• Lourdes Orozco
  • Jennifer Parker-Starbuck


As we write this introduction, Donna Haraway’s The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Signifi cant Otherness (2003) has just celebrated its tenth anniversary. Haraway is an influential figure in Animal Studies, an interdisciplinary research field which is concerned with centralizing the animal within human culture and questioning humananimal relations; it is largely preoccupied with Western philosophical models and how these models have too often represented a disregard for the animal. In this manifesto, as in much of her work, Haraway explores the concept of species companionship (here, through her experiences in dog agility competitions). Her investigations around interspecies communication and collaboration are realized specifically through terms of performance as she and her dog, Cayenne Pepper, work together to produce a successful event. The context through which Haraway formulates her ideas around humananimal relations is not dissimilar to that of the theatre — it variously includes embodied collaboration, presence, ‘actors’, ‘directors’, training, theatricalized settings, companionship, amateurs and professionals; it includes joy. Performing Animality is drawn together as a volume to speak to all of these ideas as humans and ‘other animals’ perform.1


Performance Study Performance Context Performance Practice Animal Performance Animal Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boyde, M., ed. 2013. Captured: The Animal Within Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Chaudhuri, U. 2003. ‘Animal Geographies: Zooësis and the Space of Modern Drama’. Modern Drama 46.4: 646–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaudhuri, U. and H. Hughes, eds. 2014. Animal Acts: Performing Species Today. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. Gorman, J. 2012. ‘Animal Studies Cross Campus to Lecture Hall’ New York Times, 2 January 2012. (accessed 10 April 2014).
  5. Haraway D. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  6. Knowles, R. 2013. ‘Editorial Comment: Interspecies Performance’. Theatre journal 64.3.Google Scholar
  7. Orozco, L. 2013a. ‘Manifesting the Animal in Performance’. In L. Cull and W. Daddario (eds), Manifesto Now! Instructions for Philosophy, Performance, Politics. Chicago and Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  8. Orozco, L. 2013b. Theatre & Animals. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Parker-Starbuck, J. 2006. ‘Becoming-Animate: On the Performed Limits of “Human”’. Theatre Journal 58.4.Google Scholar
  10. Parker-Starbuck, J. 2008. ‘Pig Bodies and Vegetative States: Diagnosing the Symptoms of a Culture of Excess’. Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 18.2: 133–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Parker-Starbuck, J. 2013. ‘Animal Ontologies and Media Representations: Robotics, Puppets, and the Real of War Horse’. Theatre Journal 65.3: 373–CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peterson, M. 2007. ‘The Animal Apparatus: From a Theory of Animal Acting to an Ethics of Animal Acts’. TDR: The Drama Review 51.1: 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Read, A. 2000. ‘Editorial: On Animals’. Performance Research 5.2.Google Scholar
  14. Ridout, N. 2006. Stage Fright, Animals and Other Theatrical Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tait, P. 2012. Wild and Dangerous Performances: Animals, Emotions, Circus. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Walker, E. 2008. Horse. London: Reaktion.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lourdes Orozco and Jennifer Parker-Starbuck 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lourdes Orozco
  • Jennifer Parker-Starbuck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations