Domestic Management

Part of the Genders and Sexualities in History book series (GSX)


One of the marked differences between early modern and twenty-first-century households was the ubiquitous presence of servants and lodgers in the former, especially in urban communities. The interactions of masters and mistresses with their domestic employees is well-explored terrain, but to a significant degree ‘the long history of problematic relations between servant and employer has frequently been characterised by manipulation, loaded negotiation, tension and conflict’ with far less attention paid to moments of compassion and collaboration, something which this chapter aims to rectify.1 By contrast, ‘the circumstances and experiences of both lodgers and those who took lodgers into their dwellings or shops has not been subjected to detailed examination by historians’.2 This chapter makes contributions to the historiography of both topics, focusing on the positive aspects of domestic relationships from the perspectives of mistress, maidservant and landlady.


Seventeenth Century Female Employee Poor Woman Domestic Service Early Modern Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    J. McEwan and P. Sharpe, ‘“It buys me freedom”: genteel lodging in late seventeenth-and eighteenth-century London’, Parergon, 24:2 (2007), p. 160.Google Scholar
  2. 16.
    L. Gowing, ‘Secret births and infanticides in seventeenth-century England’, Past and Present, 156 (1997), pp. 92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 69.
    W. C. Baer, ‘Landlords and tenants in London, 1550–1700’, Urban History, 38:2 (2011), pp. 234–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. V. Harding, ‘Families and housing in seventeenth-century London’, Parergon, 24:2 (2007), pp. 129–30Google Scholar
  5. M. Berry and P. Baker, ‘“For the house her self and one servant”: family and household in late seventeenth-century London’, London Journal, 34:3 (2009), pp. 213–17.Google Scholar
  6. 70.
    W. C. Baer, ‘Housing the poor and mechanick class in seventeenth-century London’, London Journal, 25:2 (2000), pp. 13–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. W. C. Baer, ‘Housing for the lesser sort in Stuart London: findings from certificates, and returns of divided houses’, London Journal, 33:1 (2008), pp. 61–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 72.
    B. Capp, ‘The poet and the bawdy court: Michael Drayton and the lodging-house world in early Stuart London’, The Seventeenth Century, 10:1 (1995), pp. 27–37.Google Scholar
  9. 77.
    D. Willen, ‘Women in the public sphere in early modem England: the case of the urban working poor’, Sixteenth Century Journal, 19:4 (1988), pp. 562–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 78.
    R. Munkhoff, ‘Searchers of the dead: authority, marginality, and the interpretation of plaguem England, 1574–1665’, Gender and History, 11:1 (1999), p. 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tim Reinke-Williams 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social SciencesUniversity of NorthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations