Abstract
The rapid rise of the legacy concept toward cross-functional and cross-textual hegemony within sports mega-event discourse is quite a magical accomplishment with far-reaching real-world consequences. In my understanding, legacy discourse is a way of making the world by the art of naming, by making use of magical words of power that have symbolic efficacy without an objective corollary. My analysis of the discourse on the legacy of the Beijing 2008 Games reveals that legacy discourse is characterized by techniques that corroborate taken-for-granted structures of representation and causality. Legacy advocates are using distinctions and oppositions to break down the world into bits and pieces and to pull them back together in ritual processes into an experience of reality as continuous as it is seamless.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brownell, Susan (2008). Beijing’s Games: What the Olympics Mean to China. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Centre of Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) (2007). Mega-Events, Olympic Games and Housing Rights. Opportunities for the Olympic Movement and Others. Geneva: COHRE.
Collins, Sandra (2011). ‘East Asian Olympic Desires: Identity on the Global Stage in the 1964 Tokyo, 1988 Seoul and 2008 Beijing Games’. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 28, 16, 2240–2260.
Gratton, Chris and Holger Preuss (2008). ‘Maximizing Olympic Impacts by Building Up Legacies’. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 25, 14, 1922–1938.
Horne, John and Wolfram Manzenreiter (eds) (2006) Sports Mega-Events: Social Scientific Analyses of a Global Phenomenon. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Horton, Peter and John Saunders (2012). ‘The “East Asian” Olympic Games: What of Sustainable Legacies?’ The International Journal of the History of Sport, 29, 6, 887–911.
IOC (2010). Final Report of the IOC Coordination Commission. Games of the XXIX Olympiad, Beijing 2008. Lausanne: IOC.
Kelly, William W. 2011. ‘Beijing 2008 and the Limits of Exceptionalism’ in William W. Kelly and Susan Brownell (eds), The Olympics in East Asia: Nationalism, Regionalism, and Globalism on the Center Stage of World Sports edited by (pp. 5–18). New Haven: Council on East Asian Studies, Yale University.
Levy-Straus, Claude (1966). The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MacAloon, John (2008). ‘“Legacy” as Managerial/Magical Discourse in Contemporary Olympic Affairs’. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 25, 14, 2060–2071.
Manzenreiter, Wolfram (2010). ‘Global Movements, Sports Spectacles and the Transformation of Representational Power’. Asia Pacific World, 1, 1, pp. 37–55.
Preuss, Holger (2007). ‘The Conceptualisation and Measurement of Mega Sport Event Legacies’. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 12, 4, 207–228.
Shen, Wenjie (2012). ‘London 2012 Media Watch: After the Medals’. Caixin Online, 13 August 2012. http://english.caixin.com/2012–08-13/100423536.html (accessed 12 October 2012).
Yu Ying and Liu Jiangyong (2011). ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Olympic Impact in East Asia: From Japan, South Korea to China’. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 28, 16, 2290–2308.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Wolfram Manzenreiter
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Manzenreiter, W. (2014). Magical Thought and the Legacy Discourse of the 2008 Beijing Games. In: Grix, J. (eds) Leveraging Legacies from Sports Mega-Events: Concepts and Cases. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137371188_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137371188_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47548-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37118-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)