Abstract
The founding of the Ẓāhirī madhhab1 is attributed to Abū Sulaymān Dāwūd ibn ‘Alī ibn Khalaf al-Isbahānī al-Zāhirī (d. 270/884), whose biographers portray him as a scholar who possessed vast knowledge and argumentation skills and had many followers. The Shāfi’ī scholar Abū Isḥāq al-Shīrāzī (d. 476/1083) goes so far as to state that the “mastership of knowledge in Baghdad culminated in Dāwūd,”2 a problematic statement given the lack of some basic biographical information on Dāwūd and his life. Furthermore, none of Dāwūd’s works has survived. In his Fihrist, Ibn al-Nadīm (d. 438/1047) attributes to him a large number of works, including ones that obviously dealt with legal theoretical subjects of uṣūl al-fiqh—such as al-Uṣūl, a copy of which Tāj al-Dīn al-Subkī (d. 771/1370) seems to have had a copy some five hundred years after Dāwūd’s death; Kitāb al-Dhabb ‘an al-Sunan wa-l-Aḥkām wa-l-Akhbār (“In Defense of Sunnas, Rulings, and Reports,” a work said to have comprised 1000 folios); Kitāb al-Ijmā’ (on consensus); Kitāb Ibṭāl al-Taqlīd (on the invalidity of the [uncritical] following of others’ views); Kitīb Ibṭṭl al-Qiyās (on the invalidity of analogy); Kitāb Khabar al-Wāḥid (on traditions narrated by one transmitter); Kitāb al-Khabar al-Mūjib li-l-’Ilm (on reports that establish apodictic knowledge); Kitāb al-Khuṣūs wa-l-’Umum (on the restrictedness and unrestrictedness of terms); Kitāb al-Mufassar wa-l-Mujmal (on clear and ambiguous terms); in addition to an untitled work where Dāwūd apparently presented some of Muḥammad ibn Idrīs al-Shāfi’ī’s (d. 204/820) views (Kitāb al-Kāfī fī Maqīlat al-Muṭṭalibī).3 Dāwūd, in fact, began his scholarly career as a follower of al-Shāfi’ī and later Shāfi’ī biographers regularly refer to him as such.4
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
I say madhhab rather than “school of law” because Ẓāhirism never actually developed into a law school proper, as I argue in Amr Osman, The Ẓāhirī Madhhab: A Textualist Theory of Islamic Law (Brill, 2014).
Al-Shirāzī, Ṭabaqāt al-Fuqahā’ (Beirut: Dār al-Rā’id al-’Arabī, 1970), p. 92.
Ibn Abi Ḥātim al-Rāzī, al-Jarḥ wa-l-Ta’dīl, Vol. 1 (Haydarabad: Matba’at Jām’iyyat Dā’irat al-Ma’ārif al-’Uthmāniyyah, 1942), p. 410.
For how these two activities were characteristic of scholars in Dāwūd’s time, see Christopher Melchert, The Formation of the Sunni Schools of Law: 9th–10th Centuries C.E. (Leiden, E.J. Brill, 1997), pp. 183–184.
Ibn Ḥajar al- ‘Asqalānī, Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb, Vol. 2 (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1994), p. 81.
Badr al-Dīn al-Zarkashī, al-Baḥr al-Muḥīṭ, Vol. 1 (Kuwait: Wazārat al-Awqāf wa-1–Shu’un al-Islāmiyyah, 1992), p. 154.
Abū al-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī, Mu’tamad fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh, Vol. 2 (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1983), p. 27,
and al-Shīrazī, Tabṣirah (Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1980), p. 359.
For a discussion of the Mālikī principle of ‘amal ahl al-Madīnah, see, for instance, Muhammad Yousuf Gouraya, Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence (with Special Reference to Muwatta’ Imam Malik) (Lahore: Shaikh Muhammad Ashraf 1985).
See also Khalīfah Bābakr al-Ḥasan, al-Ijtihād bi-l-Ra’y fī Madrasat al-Ḥijāz al-Fiqhiyyah (Cairo: Maktabat al-Zahrā’, 1997), pp. 463ff, and passim.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Amr Osman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Osman, A. (2015). Sunna in the Ẓāhirī Madhhab. In: Duderija, A. (eds) The Sunna and its Status in Islamic Law. Palgrave Series in Islamic Theology, Law, and History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137369925_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137369925_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57831-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36992-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)