Skip to main content

Alignment of Top-Down Pro-Internationalization Policies of Outward Foreign Direct Investment

  • Chapter
Successes and Challenges of Emerging Economy Multinationals

Abstract

Policymakers have expressed serious concern related to the alignment of public policies with the needs of internationalizing firms. For policy measures impacting outward foreign direct investments, this issue becomes particularly relevant as they can critically impact the international competitiveness of firms that determine the economic wealth and prosperity of firms’ home countries (Kokko, 2006; Sunesen, Jespersen and Thelle, 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BannĂ´, M. and Sgobbi, F. (2010). Firm participation in financial incentive programmes: The case of subsidies for outward internationalisation. Journal of Policy Modeling, 32: 792–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodas Freitas, I. M. and von Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Mapping public support for innovation: A comparison of policy alignment in the UK and France. Research Policy, 37(9): 1446–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer, C. (1998). The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in en erg)’’ policy modeling. Energy Economics, 20(3): 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braskamp (1980). Utilization of Evaluative Information: New Directions for Program Evaluation. First Edition, Number 5. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm, P. and Oxelheim, L. (2000). Does foreign direct investment replace home country investment? The effect of European integration on the location of Swedish investment. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2): 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busse, M., Koniger, J., and Nunnenkamp, P. (2010). FDI promotion through bilateral investment treaties: More than a BIT? Review of World Economics, 146(1): 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BĂĽthe, T. and Milner, H. (2009). Bilateral investment treaties and foreign direct investment: A political analysis. In K. Sauvant and L. Sachs (Eds.) The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellani, D., Mariotti, I., and Piscitello, L. (2008). The impact of outward investments on parent company’s employment and skill composition. Evidence from the Italian case. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19(1): 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M., Foley, O, and Hines, J. (2009). Domestic effects of the foreign activities of U.S. multinationals. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(1): 181–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durah, J. and Ubeda, F. (2001). The efficiency of government promotion for outward FDI. Journal of International Business Studies, 9(24): 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2008). Design and reform of institutions in LDCs and transition economies: Institutions: Top down or bottom up? The American Economic Review, 98(2): 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger, P., Larch, M., Pfaffermayr, M., & Winner, H. (2009). The impact of endogenous tax treaties on foreign direct investment: Theory and empirical evidence. In K. Sauvant and L. Sachs (Eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger, P. and Pfaffermayr, M. (2009). The impact of bilateral investment treaties on foreign direct investment. In K. Sauvant and L. Sachs (Eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. (1978). Organizational models of social program implementation. Public Policy, 26(2): 185–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsman, H. (2009). Improving innovation capabilities of small enterprises: Cluster strategy as a tool. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2): 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzman, A. (1998). Why LDCs sign treaties that hurt them: Explaining the popularity of bilateral investment treaties. Virginia Journal of International Law, 38: 639–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. and Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 29(4/5): 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. and Knudson, M. (1996). Property right protection of reproducible genetic material. Review of Agricultural Economics, 18(3): 403–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. and McMillan, M. (2011). Offshoring jobs? Multinationals and U.S. manufacturing employment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3): 857–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4): 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerner, A. (2009). Why should i believe you? The costs and consequences of bilateral investment treaties. International Studies Quarterly, 53(1): 73–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, A. (2006). The home country effects of FDI in developed economies. Working Paper 225, European Institute of Japanese Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, C. and te Velde, D. W. (2001). Bridging the energy efficiency gap: Using bottom-up information in a top-down energy demand model. Energy Economics, 23(1): 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140): 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Xue, Q. and Han, B. (2010). How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China. Journal of World Business, 45(1): 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millimet, D. and Kumas, A. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Assessing the impact of bilateral tax treaties on U.S. FDI activity. In K. Sauvant and L. Sachs (Eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, D. and Kedia, B. L. (2012). Off shoring and MNC strategy. In A. Verbeke and H. Merchant (Eds.), Handbook of Research on International Strategic Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. and Spess, L. (2009). Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries? In K. Sauvant and L. Sachs (Eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, E. and Weiss, R. (2010). Top-down versus bottom-up. Science, 328(5983): 1241–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxelheim, L. and Wihlborg, C. (1995). Measuring macroeconomic exposure: The case of Volvo cars. European Financial Management, 1(3): 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, D. and Hallett, M. (1993). Conflict versus consensus models in policy evaluation and implementation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 16(1): 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (2009). The global BITs regime and the domestic environment for investment. In K. Sauvant and L. Sachs (Eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1): 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salacuse, J. and Sullivan, N. (2009). Do BITs really work: An evaluation of bilateral investment treaties and their grand bargain. In K. Sauvant and L. Sachs (Eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunesen, E., Jespersen, S. and Thelle, M. (2010). Impacts of EU Outward FDI. Final Report. Copenhagen: Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. and Rose-Ackerman, S. (2005). Foreign direct investment and the business environment in developing countries: The impact of bilateral investment treaties. Law and Economics Research Paper 293, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2007). Bilateral investment treaties 1995–2006: Trends in Investment Rulemaking. Technical Report, New York, USA and Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2009). The impact on foreign direct investment of BITs. In K. Sauvant and L. Sachs (Eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren, D. P., Hoogwijk, M., Barker, T., Riahi, K., Boeters, S., Chateau, J., Scrieciu, S., van Vliet, J., Masui, T., Blok, K., Blomen, E., and Kram, T. (2009). Comparison of top-down and bottomup estimates of sectoral and regional greenhouse gas emission reduction potentials. Energy Policy, 37: 5125–5139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedung, E. (1998). Policy instruments: Typologies and theories. In M.-L. Bemelmans-Videc, R. C. Rist, and E. Vedung (Eds.), Carrots, Sticks and Sermons: Policy Instruments and their Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers, 21–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedung, E. (2009). Public Policy and Program Evaluation. Fourth Edition. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedung, E. (2010). Four waves of evaluation. Evaluation, 16(3): 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T. and Bansal, P. (2012). Social responsibility in new ventures: Profiting from a long-term orientation. Strategic Management journal, 33(10): 1135–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yackee, J. (2009). Do BITs really work? Revisiting the empirical link between investment treaties and foreign direct investment. In K. Sauvant and L. Sachs (Eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeaple, S. (2006). Off shoring, foreign direct investment, and the structure of U.S. trade, journal of the European Economic Association, 4: 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Miguel Matos Torres and Francisco Figueira de Lemos

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torres, M.M., de Lemos, F.F. (2014). Alignment of Top-Down Pro-Internationalization Policies of Outward Foreign Direct Investment. In: Marinov, M.A., Marinova, S.T. (eds) Successes and Challenges of Emerging Economy Multinationals. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137369413_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics