Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to offer support for the view — one contrary to the main tradition represented by Alexander and most more recent commentators — that there are, in fact, two different sets and two different, and incompatible, doctrines of categories in Aristotle. I do not have in mind here any difference between the Categories, or the Organon, and the Metaphysics. Rather, both doctrines are present in the Organon and even in a single chapter of the Organon, Topics I.9. The proper explanation for this striking fact is not, as some would suggest, historical or developmental — that one doctrine came earlier in Aristotle’s thinking, the other later. Nor is it, as others have suggested, that both doctrines need to be mastered to adequately employ dialectic, so that both are present in the Topics. Instead, as we shall see, one doctrine, for Aristotle, is precisely suited to the needs of the art of reasoning kata doxan, i.e. to the practice of dialectic, the other to procedure kat’ aletheian, or to the needs and the practice of science, indeed of metaphysical science. I go on to consider a main question for this result, one whose proper resolution helps us to understand better Aristotle’s scientific method overall and the special, if limited, role of dialectic in it. I begin by developing a problem for the interpretation of Topics I.9.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackrill, J. L. 1963. Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Bolton, R. 1987. “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals,” in A. Gotthelf and J. Lennox, (eds), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
— 1990. “The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic,” in D. Devereux and P. Pellegrin, (eds), Biologie, Logique et Metaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: Editions du CNRS).
— 1991. “Aristotle on the Objectivity of Ethics,” in J. Anton and A. Preus, (eds), Essays In Ancient Greek Philosophy IV: Aristotle’s Ethics (Albany: State University of New York Press).
— 1995. “Science and the Science of Substance in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76: 419–69.
Brunschwig, J. 1967. Aristote: Topiques (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).
Frede, M. 1987a. “Categories in Aristotle,” in M. Frede, Essays in Ancient Philosophy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
— 1987b. “The Title, Unity and Authenticity of the Aristotelian Categories,” in M. Frede, Essays in Ancient Philosophy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
Frede, M. and G. Patsig. 1988. Aristoteles Metaphysik Z (München: C. H. Beck).
Malink, M. 2007. “Categories in Topics I.9,” Rhizai: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 4: 271–94.
Matthen, M. 1978. “The Categories and Aristotle’s Ontology,” Dialogue 17: 228–43.
Menn, S. 1995. “Metaphysics, Dialectic and the Categories,” Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale 100: 311–37.
Reeve, C. D. C. 1992. Practices of Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Ross, W. D. 1936. Aristotle’s Physics (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Smith, R. 1997. Aristotle’s Topics I and VIII (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Robert Bolton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bolton, R. (2013). Two Doctrines of Categories in Aristotle: Topics, Categories, and Metaphysics. In: Feser, E. (eds) Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. Philosophers in Depth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137367907_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137367907_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34815-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36790-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)