Abstract
Modern philosophy began with a rebellion against the Aristotelianism of the Scholastics and has, to a large extent, always been defined by it. To be sure, even in the work of the early moderns, the rejection of Aristotelian ideas was not always thoroughgoing. For instance, the Scholastic holdovers in the systems of Descartes and Locke are well-known, and Leibniz was keen to synthesize as much of previous thought as he could. But the obsolescence of the core doctrines of Aristotle’s metaphysics and philosophy of nature — such as hylemorphism, the theory of act and potency, and the doctrine of the four causes — would eventually become something like settled wisdom in post-Cartesian Western thought.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ariew, André. 2002. “Platonic and Aristotelian Roots of Teleological Arguments,” in André Ariew, Robert Cummins, and Mark Perlman (eds) Functions: New Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Ariew, André. 2007. “Teleology,” in D. Hull and M. Ruse (eds) The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Cartwright, Nancy. 1992. “Aristotelian Natures and the Modern Experimental Method,” in John Earman (ed.) Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).
Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Ellis, Brian. 2001. Scientific Essentialism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Ellis, Brian. 2002. The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism (Chesham: Acumen).
Fine, Kit. 1994a. “Essence and Modality,” in J. Tomberlin (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives 8: 1–16.
Fine, Kit. 1994b. “A Puzzle Concerning Matter and Form,” in T. Scaltsas, D. Charles, and M. L. Gill (eds) Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics (Clarendon Press: Oxford).
Foot, Philippa. 2001. Natural Goodness (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Groff, Ruth and Greco, John (eds) 2012. Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism (London: Routledge).
Haldane, John. (ed.) 2002. Mind, Metaphysics, and Value in the Thomistic and Analytical Traditions (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).
Hawthorne, John and Daniel Nolan. 2006. “What Would Teleological Causation Be?” in John Hawthorne (ed.) Metaphysical Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Heil, John. 2003. From an Ontological Point of View (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Lowe, E. J. 2006. The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).
Martin, C. B. 2008. The Mind in Nature (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Molnar, George. 2003. Powers: A Study in Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Mumford, Stephen. 2009. “Causal Powers and Capacities,” in Helen Beebee, Christopher Hitchcock, and Peter Menzies (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Causation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Nagel, Thomas. 2012. Mind and Cosmos (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Novak, Lukas. and Daniel. D. Novotny, Prokop Sousedik, and David Svoboda, (eds) 2012. Metaphysics: Aristotelian, Scholastic, Analytic (Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag).
Nussbaum, Martha. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Oderberg, David S. 2007. Real Essentialism (London: Routledge).
Tahko, Tuomas (ed.) 2012. Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Thompson, Michael. 2008. Life and Action (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Edward Feser
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feser, E. (2013). Introduction: An Aristotelian Revival?. In: Feser, E. (eds) Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. Philosophers in Depth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137367907_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137367907_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34815-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36790-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)