Abstract
Urban planning in cities of the Global South does not have a good track record in addressing urban poverty. Infused with colonially inherited planning systems, at best, planning has often been associated with lack of recognition of poor informal areas of the city; at worst, with the eviction of poor households and/or their livelihoods. At the same time, urban planning has often been reticent in challenging powerful actors in the city who are benefiting unequally from its development, creating a system of city management that is neither transparent nor accountable, and contributing to the reproduction of socio-spatial urban inequalities. This tendency is even more pronounced in a neo-liberal age when the aims of planning have been reframed as supporting the market and enhancing the vision of the ‘competitive city’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, A. and Apsan Frediani, A. (2013). Farmers, not gardeners: The making of environmentally just spaces in Accra.City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 17: 365–381.
Apsan Frediani, A., Lipietz, B. and Butcher, S. (forthcoming). Strategic Upgrading: Lessons from International Critical Practices, in: L. Cirolia, T. Görgens, M. van Donk, W. Smit and S. Drimie (eds), Pursuing a Partnership Based Approach to Incremental Informal Settlement Upgrading in South Africa. Cape Town: UCT Press.
Bombay First-McKinsey. (2003). Vision Mumbai — Transforming Mumbai into a World Class City, A Summary of Recommendations. Mumbai: Bombay First, and McKinsey and Company.
Búrra, S. (2005). Towards a pro-poor framework for slum upgrading in Mumbai, India.Environment and Urbanization, 17(1): 67–88.
Búrra, S. (1999). Resettlement and Rehabilitation of the Urban Poor: The Story of Kan jur Marg.DPU Working Paper, No 99, UCL.
D’Cruz, C. and Satterthwaite, D. (2005). Building Homes, Changing Official Approaches: The Work of Urban Poor Organizations and Their Federations and Their Contributions to Meeting the Millennium Development Goals in Urban Areas.IIED Working Paper, No 16, on Poverty Reduction in Urban Areas.
Dikeç, M. (2001). Justice and the spatial imagination.Environment and Planning A, 33: 1785–1805.
Dikeç, M. (2006). Independent Evaluation of the Community Led Financial Facility (CLIFF). Interim Report, Cities Alliance and GHK May/June.
Dikeç, M. (2008). Community Led Infrastructure Finance Facility (CLIFF) End of Project Evaluation, carried out by IPE, HIS and WDP on behalf of Sida and DflD.
Fraser, N. (1998a). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a ‘post-socialist’ age, in: C. Willet (ed.), TheorisingMulticulturalism: A Guide to the Current Debate. Maiden and Oxford: Blackwell, 19–49.
Fraser, N. (1998b). A rejoinder to Iris Young, in: C. Willet (ed.), Theorising Multiculturalism: A Guide to the Current Debate, Maiden and Oxford: Blackwell, 68–72.
Fraser, N. (1996). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation.The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Stanford University 30 April-2 May [http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/ documents/Fraser98.pdf], accessed 30 May 2013.
Garikipati, S. and Olsen, W. (2008). The role of agency in development planning and the development process: Introduction to the Special Issue on agency and development.IDPR, 30(4): 327–338.
Healey P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Macmillan.
Homeless International, CLIFF Annual Review 08. (2008). Community Led Financial Facility (CLIFF): A Discussion of Institutional Roles and Responsibilities Within CLIFF, HI, September.
Jack, M., Morris, I. and McLeod, R. (2005). Third CLIFF India Monitoring Report, HI.
Levy, C. (2013a). Travel choice reframed: ‘Deep distribution’ and gender in urban transport. Environment and Urbanization, 25(1): 47–63.
Levy C. and Dávila, J. D. (2013b). Planning for Mobility and Socio-Environmental Justice: The Case ofMedellxn. Paper presented at workshop on Resilience and Environmentaljusticeinthe Urban Global South, convened the Environmental Justice, Urbanisation and Resilience (EJUR) DPU Research Cluster, 12–13 September.
Levy C. (2007). Defining Strategic Action Planning Led by Civil Society Organisations: The Case of CLIFF, India. Paper presented at the 8th N-AERUS Conference, London, 6–8 September.
Levy, C, Allen, A., Castán Broto, V. and Westman, L. (forthcoming). Unlocking urban trajectories: Planning for environmentally just transitions in the Global South.
Mahadevia, D. (2006). Shanghaing Mumbai: Visions, Displacements and Politics of A Globalising City. Paper presented at the IDPAD end symposium Hyderabad (India) 1–3 November.
McFarlane, C. (2012). The entrepreneurial slum: Civil society, mobility and the co-production of urban development.Urban Studies, 49(13): 2795–2816.
McLeod, R. and Mullard, K. (eds) (2006). Bridging the Finance Gap in Housing and Infrastructure. Rugby: ITDG.
McLeod, R. (2005). CLIFF — Achievements, learning and issues to be addressed, HI.
McLeod, R. (2002). Research on Bridging the Finance Gap in Housing and Infrastructure and the Development of CLIFF. Interim paper prepared as part of Bridging the Finance Gap in Housing and Infrastructure Research Project.
Risbud, N (2003). The case of Mumbai, India, in: Understanding Slums: Case Studies for the Global Report on Human Settlements. UN-Habitat.
Patel, S. (2004). Tools and methods for empowerment developed by slum and pavement dwellers’ federations in India.Participatory Learning and Action, 117–130.
Patel, S., d’Cruz, C. and Burra, S. (2002). Beyond evictions in a global city: People-managed resettlement in Mumbai.Environment and Urbanization, 24(1): 159–177.
Patel, S. and Arputham, J. (2008). Plans for Dharavi: Negotiating a reconciliation between a state-driven market redevelopment and residents’ aspirations.Environment and Urbanization, 20(1): 243–253.
Patel, S. and Arputham, J. (2007). An offer of partnership or a promise of conflict in Dharavi, Mumbai?, Environment and Urbanization,19(2): 501–508.
Patel, S., Arputham, J., Buna, S. and Savchuk, K. (2009). Getting the information base for Dharavi’s redevelopment.Environment and Urbanization, 21(1): 241–251.
Patel, S. and Mitlin, D. (2004). Grassroots-driven development: The Alliance of SPARC, the National Slum Dwellers Federation and Manila Milan, in: D. Mitlin and D. Satterhwaite (ed.), Empowering Squatter Citizen. London: Earths can, 216–241.
Patel, S. and Mitlin, D. (2001). The Work of SPARC and Its Partners Mahila Milan and the National Slum Dwellers Federation in India. IIED Working Paper 5 on Urban Poverty Reduction, London.
Patel, S. and Sharma, K. (1998). One David and three Goliaths: Avoiding anti-poor solutions to Mumbai’s transport problems.Environment and Urbanization, 10(2): 149–159.
Safier, M. (2002). On Estimating ‘room for manoeuvre’.City, 6(1): 117–132.
Satterthwaite, D. and Mitlin, D. (2014). Reducing Urban Poverty in the Global South. London and New York: Routledge.
Young, I. M. (1998). Unruly categories: A critiques of Nancy Fraser’s Dual Systems Theory, in: C. Willet (ed), Theorising Multiculturalism: A Guide to the Current Debate. Maiden and Oxford: Blackwell, 50–67.
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Copyright information
© 2015 Caren Levy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Levy, C. (2015). Expanding the ‘Room for Manoeuvre’: Community-Led Finance in Mumbai, India. In: The City in Urban Poverty. EADI Global Development Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137367433_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137367433_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47449-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36743-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)