Skip to main content

Adoption of the Global Reporting Initiative by FT500 firms: Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness

  • Chapter
International Business and Institutions after the Financial Crisis

Part of the book series: The Academy of International Business ((AIB))

  • 440 Accesses

Abstract

The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) is the most widely accepted global framework for voluntary corporate reporting of environmental and social performance and has been adopted by thousands of businesses across 72 countries (GRI, 2013). It is considered the ‘leading template for voluntary sustainability reporting’ (Brown et al., 2009) and the ‘most relevant institution in the sustainability context’ (Moneva et al., 2006). However GRI reporting has fallen far short of attaining a status equivalent to financial reporting standards, which are mandatory in most countries. Sustainability reporting standards such as the GRI have not yet achieved the same status and are only mandatory in a few countries. Despite its name, implementation of the GRI has been highly uneven geographically. Indeed, in some countries such as the USA and the UK, an analysis of companies in the GRI database (http://database.globalreporting.org/) shows that the uptake and diffusion of the GRI to new organizations appears to be slowing down (Levy et al., 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, P.S. (2002) Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(2): 223–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M.L. and Salomon, R.M. (2012) Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 1304–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertels, S. and Peloza, J. (2008) Running just to stand still Managing CSR reputation in an era of ratcheting expectations. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(1): 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, J.E., Webb, A., Fraser, D.J., Harvey, P.J., Barsky J. and Haider, A. (2003) Race to the top: attracting and enabling global sustainable business. Business Survey Report. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, K., Mattén, D. and Moon, J. (2004) The adoption of voluntary codes of conduct in MNCs: a three-country comparative study. Business and Society Review, 109(4): 449–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H.S., de Jong, M. and Lessidrenska, T. (2009) The rise of the global reporting initiative: a case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics, 18(2): 182–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C.R. and Jennings, M.M. (2002) Transportation research. Logistics and Transportation Review, 38(1): 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappie, W. and Moon, J. (2005) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business Society, 44(4): 415–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. and Bouvain, P. (2009) Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87: 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2006) Who cares about corruption? Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 803–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B. and Mamingi, N. (2001) Pollution and capital markets in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42(3): 310–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 47–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, G., Hart, S. and Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8): 1059–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R.G. and Krzus, M.P. (2010) One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, L. and Miller, S.R. (2004) Distance matters: liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. Advances in International Management, 16: 187–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger, P. and Winner, H. (2006) How corruption influences foreign direct investment: a panel data study. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54(2): 459–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, A. (2006) Corporate social responsibility as a signalling device for foreign direct investment. In terna tional Journal of the Economics of Business, 13(1): 145–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guler, I., Guillen, M.F. and MacPherson, J.M. (2000) Global competition, institutions and the diffusion of organizational practices: the international spread of the ISO 9000 quality standard. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(2): 207–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, J.S., Jones, G. and Kaufmann, D. (2000) Are foreign investors and multinationals engaging in corrupt practices in transition economies? Transition, 11(3-4): 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussainey, K. and Salama, A. (2010) The importance of corporate environmental reputation to investors. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 11(3): 229–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. and Apostolakou, A. (2010) Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: an institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3): 371–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. (2008) Sustainability accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. and Pereg, P. (2010) Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: an international investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3): 182–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. (1999) Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 308–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. (2003) How corruption affects persistent capital flows. Economics of Governance, 4(3): 229–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, S. and Coderre, F. (2012) Determinants of GR G3 application levels: the case of the Fortune Global 500. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20:182–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy D.L., Brown, H.S. and de Jong, M. (2010) The contested politics of corporate governance: the case of the global reporting initiative. Business and Society, 49(1): 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. and Asaba, S. (2006) Why do firms imitate each other? Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 366–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, DA. (2004) Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, S., Lyon, N. and Maxwell, J.W. (2000) Quality leadership when regulatory standards are forthcoming. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(3): 331–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T.P. and Maxwell, J.W. (2008) Corporate social responsibility and the environment: a theoretical perspective. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2): 240–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M.J. and Brown, M.E. (2006) Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1): 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattén, D. and Moon, J. (2008) ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Managemen t Review, 3 3 (2): 4 0 4 -24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morhardt, J.E., Baird, S. and Freeman, K. (2002) Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(4): 215-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moneva, J.M., Archel, P. and Correa, C. (2006) GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsust ainability A ccoun ting Forum, 3 0 (2): 121–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaeva, R. and Bicho, M. (2011) The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1): 136–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peregs, P. and Kolk, A. (2012) Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: the evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2): 173–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, R. and Neumayer, E. (2010) Geographic variations in the early diffusion of corporate voluntary standards: comparing ISO 14001 and the Global Compact. Environment and Planning A, 42(2): 347–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, A. and Potoski, M. (2007) Collective action through voluntary environmental programs: a club theory perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 35(4): 773–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M., Kief f ner, A. and Bertels S. (2011) Signaling sustainability leadership: empirical evidence of the value of DJSI membership. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3): 493–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, P., Siegel, D.S., Hillmann, A. and Eden, L. (2006) Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: politics, corruption and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 733–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.S. and Vitaliano, D.F. (2007) An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16(3): 773–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simnet, R., Vanstraelen, A. and Chua, W.F. (2009) Assurance on sustainability reports: an international comparison. Accounting Review, 84(3): 937–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1973) Job market signaling. Quarterly journal of Economics, 87(3): 355–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, I. (2010) International and intercultural perspectives on corporate citizenship: a meta-synthesis. Working paper SGOCI, 4, available at: http://www.sgoci.com.

  • Tolbert, P. and Zucker, L. (1983) Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1): 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (2010) 859 Companies Delisted for Failure to Communicate on Progress. UN Media Release, 1 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanderley L.S.O., Lucián, R., Farache, F. and de Sousa Filho, J.M. (2008) CSR information disclosure on the web: a context-based approach analysing the influence of country of origin and industry sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2): 369–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. and Rwabizambuga, A. (2006) Institutional pressures, corporate reputation and voluntary codes of conduct: an examination of the equator principles. Business and Society Review, 111(1): 89–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. (1987) Institutional theories of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 1: 443–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Stephen Chen and Petra Bouvain

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, S., Bouvain, P. (2014). Adoption of the Global Reporting Initiative by FT500 firms: Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness. In: Temouri, Y., Jones, C. (eds) International Business and Institutions after the Financial Crisis. The Academy of International Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137367204_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics