Skip to main content

Process Innovation and Value Chain Management

  • Chapter
Architecting Enterprise
  • 336 Accesses

Abstract

Process innovation is a chain of activities designed to reduce the cost and time of manufacturing a product or delivering a service with the desired quality and competitive advantage. The most challenging issue in process innovation and improvement is identifying the redundancies in the manufacturing or services delivery process and eliminating them to reduce the cost and time involved in the process of generating the final output. Therefore, it is essential for managers to understand the process at work and find a critical path to optimize the time and cost of carrying out an innovation. The relevant executives can design an efficient process to improve workable ideas that will make a real difference to the organization as they move the innovation into the marketplace. This chapter discusses the capabilities and competencies of companies in carrying out process innovation and value chain management, and analyzes the process outcome and focus. The chapter also addresses various issues referring to managing process improvements, and developing an innovation value chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmed, J. U. (1996), Modern approaches to product reliability improvement, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 13(3), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. and Billou, N. (2007), Serving the world’s poor: Innovation at the base of the economic pyramid, Journal of Business Strategy, 28(2), 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bala, V. and Green, J. (2007), Charge what your products are worth, Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua, A. and Whinston, A. B. (1998), Decision support for managing organizational design dynamics, Decision Support Systems, 22(1), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C, Moslem, K., Piller, R, and Reichwald, R. (2005), Co-designing modes of cooperation at the customer interface: Learning from exploratory research, European Management Review, 2 (1), 70–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blenko, M. W., Mankins, M. C, and Rogers, R (2010), The decision driven organization, Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarero, C. (2007), Relationship orientation or service quality: What is the trigger of performance in financial and insurance services? The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 25(6), 406–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardy, R. L. and Selvaraj, T. T. (2006), Competencies: Alternative frameworks for competitive advantage, Business Horizon, 49(3), 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cedergren, S., Wall, A., and Norstorm, C. (2010), Evaluation of performance in a product development context, Business Horizons, 53(4), 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. Z., Mehta, R., Chen, S. J., Polsa, P., and Mazur, J. (1999), The effects of market orientation on effectiveness and efficiency: The case of automotive distribution channels in Finland and Poland, Journal of Services Marketing, 13 (4-5), 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. W. and Mauborgne, R. A. (1999), Creating new market space, Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2002), Making sense of corporate venture capital, Harvard Business Review, 80(3), 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., and Verlinden, M. C. (2001), Skate to where the money will be, Harvard Business Review, 79(10), 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, W. R and Crittenden, V L. (2009), Building a capable organization: The eight levers of strategy implementation, Business Horizon, 51(4), 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewhurst, M., Hancock, B., and Ellsworth, D. (2013), Redesigning knowledge work, Harvard Business Review, 91(1), 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, A. K., Hewitt, G., and Rifkin, S. (2010), Chasing the dragon: Developing indicators for the assessment of community participation in health programs, Social Science and Medicine, 71(6), 1102–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H. (1994), Dedicated assets: Japan’s manufacturing edge, Harvard Business Review, 72(6), 174–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2008), The competitive imperative of learning, Harvard Business Review, 86(7), 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esko, S., Zeromskis, M., and Hsuan, J. (2013), Value chain and innovation at the base of the pyramid, South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 2 (2), 230–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. H., Vardan, R., Pethick, R., and El-Hout, J. (2002), Rapid-response capability in value-chain design, Sloan Management Review, 43(2), 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, S. (1994), Determinants of long term orientation in buyer-seller relationships, Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. and M. Roberto (2001), What you don’t know about making decisions? Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 108–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghandour, A. R, Swartz, P., Grenek, H. M., and Roberts, E. B. (2004), E-business transformation vial alliance clusters, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 16(4), 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gills, C. and de Bettignies, J. E. (2003), Corporate Venture Capital: The Upside of Failure and Competition for Talent, Centre for Economic Policy Research, CEPR Discussion Paper # 4139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P. A. (2002), Corporations and the financing of innovation: The corporate venturing experience, Economic Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta), 87(4), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, J. and Mintzberg, H. (2003), The five minds of a manager, Harvard Business Review, 81(11), 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosse, C. U. (2011), Global Managers’ perceptions of cultural competence, Business Horizons, 54(4), 307–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiko, G., Regine, K., and Elgar F. (2008), Exploring the effect of cognitive biases on customer support services, Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(1), 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heskett, J. L., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., Sasser, W. E. Jr., and Schlesinger, L. A. (1994), Putting the service-profit chain to work, Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 164–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, F. and Ende, J. (2006), The organizational form of vertical relationships: Dimensions of integration, Industrial Marketing Management, 35(7), 819–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Yip, G. S., and Hensmans, M. (2012), Achieving successful strategic transformation, Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R. (2007), Organizational Theory Design and Change, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. C, Lee, J. M., and Seo, J. H. (2011), Design and improvement of product using intelligent function model based cost estimating, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3131–3141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, I. C, Block, Z., and Narasimha, S. P. N. (1986), Corporate venturing alternatives, obstacles encountered and experience effect, Journal of Business Venturing, 1(2), 171–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., Koh, S. C. L., and Huang, C. (2006), Managing customer satisfaction through efficient listening tools: An evaluation of best practice in four world-class companies, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 2(1), 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, D., Ku, G., and Mumighan, J. K. (2008), When winning is everything, Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markahm, S. K., Gentry, S. T, and Hume, D. (2005), Strategies and tactics for external corporate venturing, Research Technology Management, 48(2), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. C. (1999), Dynamic view of strategy, Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, B., Baveja, A., and Jamil, M. (1998), Dynamics of core competencies in leading multinational companies, California Management Review, 40(4), 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maylor, H. (2001), Assessing the relationship between practice changes and process improvement in new product development, Omega, 29(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moores, T. T. (2010), Organizational performance under conditions of vulnerability: A multi-agent perspective, Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 3111–3117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. T. and Holden, R. K. (2002), Strategy and tactics of pricing, Journal of Revenue & Pricing Management, 1 (2002), 286–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R. and Ramirez, R. (1993), From value chain to value constellation-designing interactive strategy, Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, H. (2006), Reconciling supply chain vulnerability, risk and supply chain management, International Journal of Logistics, 9(2), 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires, G. D., Stanton, J., and Rita, P. (2006), The internet, consumer empowerment and marketing strategies, European Journal of Marketing, 40(9-10), 936–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Free Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D. I., McDermott, P., and Goh, M. (2008), Impact of value chain activities on quality and innovation, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(7), 615–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal (2007), Optimising franchisee sales and business performance, Journal of Retail and Leisure Property, 6(4), 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal (2008), Dynamics of buyer-supplier co-dependency for optimizing functional efficiency, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 4(4), 399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, F. F. and Sasser, W. E. (1990), Zero defections: Quality comes to services, Harvard Business Review, 68(5), 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. (1992), Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s, R&D Management, 22(3), 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, P. and Parry, K. (2009), Consensual commitment: A grounded theory of the meso-level influence of organizational design on leadership and decisionmaking, The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 535–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, P.J. H., Krupp, S., and Howland, S. (2013), Strategic leadership: The essential skills, Harvard Business Review, 91(1), 131–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiden, L. and MacMillan, I. C. (2006), Manage customer-centric innovation systematically, Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 108–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W., van Bruggen, G. H., and Wierenga, B. (2002), Building Stronger Channel Relationship though Information Sharing, Discussion Paper, 235, Erasmus Research Institute of Management, 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrentino, M. and Williams, M. L. (1995), Relatedness and corporate venturing: Does it really matter? Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), January, 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, F. F. and Lanzolla, G. (2005), The half truth of first mover advantage, Harvard Business Review, 83(4), 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, B., Cousins, P. D. and Brown, S. (2005), Collaborating for customization: an extended resource-based view of the firm, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 1 (1-2), 8–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, H. B. (1986), The anatomy of a corporate venturing program: Factors influencing success, Journal of Business Venturing, 1(3), 275–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talaulicar, T., Grandei, J., and Werder, A. (2005), Strategic decision making in start-ups: The effect of top management team organization and processes on speed and comprehensiveness, Journal of Business Venturing, 20(4), 519–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegarden, D. P. and Sheetz, S. D. (2003), Group cognitive mapping: a methodology and system for capturing and evaluating managerial and organizational cognition, Omega, 31(2), 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J. and Barnes, S. (2000), Spin-in or spin-out? Corporate venturing in life sciences, International Journal of Entrepreneur ship and Innovation, 1(2), 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trkman, P., Stemberger, M. I., Jaklic, J. and Ales, G. (2007), Process approach to supply chain integration, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(2), 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D. and Smallwood, N. (2004), Capitalizing on capabilities, Harvard Business Review, 82(6), 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, K. L. and Inman, J. J. (2003), Situational price sensitivity: The role of consumption occasion, social context and income, Journal of Retailing, 79(4), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werther, W. B. and Kerr, J. L (1995), The shifting sands of competitive advantage, Business Horizons, 38(3), 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Rajagopal

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rajagopal (2014). Process Innovation and Value Chain Management. In: Architecting Enterprise. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137366788_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics