Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodological Challenges in Comparative Communication Research: Advancing Cross-National Research in Times of Globalization

  • Chapter
Comparing Political Communication across Time and Space

Abstract

Comparative communication research is conventionally perceived as the contrasting of different macro-level cases (e.g. world regions, political systems, subnational regions, social milieus, language areas, cultural thick- enings) with respect to at least one object of investigation relevant to the field of communication. The comparative approach attempts to reach conclusions beyond single cases and explains differences and similarities between objects of analysis against the backdrop of their contextual condi- tions. It is important that the objects of analysis are compared on the basis of a common theoretical framework, and also that this is done by drawing on equivalent conceptualizations and methods. It should also be pointed out that spatial (cross-territorial) comparisons ought to be supplemented wherever possible by a longitudinal (cross-temporal) dimension in order to account for the fact that systems and cultures are not frozen in time, but constantly changing under the influence of manifold transformation proc- esses (for a more thorough discussion of comparative analysis see Esser and Hanitzsch, 2012; Canel and Voltmer, in this volume).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adoni, H., Caspi, D. and Cohen, A. (2006) Media, Minorities and Hybrid Identities: The Arab and Russian Communities in Israel (Cresskill: Hampton Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Babones, S. J. (2006) ‘Conducting global social research’. In C.K. Chase Dunn and S.J. Babones (eds) Global Social Change: Historical and Comparative Perspectives (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press), 8–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. and Sznaider, N. (2006) ‘Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda’. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, R. (2005) ‘Mapping field variation: journalism in France and the United States’. In R. Benson and E. Neveu (eds) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field (Cambridge: Polity Press), 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J. G. (2012) ‘Foreword’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (London: Routledge), xi-xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J. G. and M. Gurevitch (1995) The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadha, K. and Kavoori, A. (2005) ‘Globalization and national media systems: mapping interactions in policies, markets and formats’. Inj. Curran and M. Gurevitch (eds) Mass Media and Society (London: Hodder Arnold), 84–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, L. (2003) Global News Production (Copenhagen: CBS Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, S. C. (2012) ‘Incorporating comparison’. In S. Babones and C. Chase-Dunn, (eds), Handbook of World-Systems Analysis (London: Routledge), 375–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry H. and Hepp, A. (2012) ‘Comparing media cultures’. In F. Ess er and T. Hanitzsch (eds) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (London: Routledge), 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F. and Hanitzsch, T. (eds) (2012) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F. and Pfetsch, B. (2004) ‘Meeting the challenges of global communication and political integration: the significance of comparative research in a changing world’. In F. Esser and B. Pfetsch (eds) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges (New York: Cambridge University Press), 384–410.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F. and Strömbäck, J. (2012) ‘Comparing election campaign communication’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (London: Routledge), 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrée, M., Gamson, W.A., Gerhards, J. and Rucht, D. (2002) Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. and Bennett, A. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, M. (2012) ‘Media, diaspora, and the transnational context: cosmopolitan-izing cross-national comparative research?’ In I. Volkmer (ed.) The Handbook of Global Media Research (Maiden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell), 365–380.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez, K. (2012) ‘The global public sphere: a critical reappraisal’. In I. Volkmer (ed.) The Handbook of Global Media Research (Maiden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell), 175–192.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D. C. and Mancini, P. (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D. C. and Mancini, P. (2012) ‘Comparing media systems: a response to critics’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (London: Routledge), 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanitzsch, T. (2007) ‘Deconstructing journalism culture: toward a universal theory’. Communication Theory 17(4), 367–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasebrink, U. (2012) ‘Comparing media use and reception’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (London: Routledge), 382–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, M. and Riegert, K. (2012) ‘Emerging Transnational News Spheres in Global Crisis Reporting: a Research Agenda’. In I. Volkmer (ed.) The Handbook of Global Media Research (Maiden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell), 156–174.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. (2011) ‘A political scientist’s contribution to the comparative study of media systems in Europe: a response to Hallin and Mancini’. In N. Just and M. Puppis (eds) Trends in Communication Policy Research: New Theories, New Methods, New Subjects (Bristol: Intellect), 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. Y. (2012) ‘Comparing intercultural communication’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (London: Routledge), 119–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. L. (1989) ‘Cross-national research as an analytic strategy’. In Kohn, M. L. (ed.) Cross-National Research in Sociology (Newbury Park: Sage), 77–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraidy M. M. (2003) ‘Glocalization: an international communication framework?’ Journal of International Communication, 9(2), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landman, T. (2008) Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics, 3rd edition (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2012) ‘Challenges to comparative research in a globalizing media landscape’. In F. Esser andT. Hanitzsch (eds) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (London: Routledge), 415–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (1990) ‘Incorporating comparison within a world-historical perspective: an alternative comparative method’. American Journal of Sociology, 55(3), 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (1992) ‘Rethinking comparative analysis in a post-developmental context’. International Social Science Journal, 44(3), 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2004) ‘Global political communication, good governance, human development, and mass communication. In F. Esser and B. Pfetsch (eds) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges (New York: Cambridge University Press), 115–150.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. and Ingehart, R. (2009) Cosmopolitan Communications: Cultural Diversity in a Globalized World (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch, B. (2013) Political Communication Cultures in Western Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch, B. (2004) ‘From political culture to political communications culture: a theoretical approach to comparative analysis’. In F. Esser and B. Pfetsch (eds) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 344–366.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch, B. and Esser, F. (2008) ‘Conceptual challenges to the paradigms of comparative media systems in a globalized world’. Journal of Global Mass Communication, 1(3/4), 118–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch, B. and Esser, F. (2012) ‘Comparing political communication’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (London: Routledge), 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. and Russi, L. (2012) ‘Comparing media markets’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (London: Routledge), 234–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. and Teune, H. (1970) The Logic of Comparative Inquiry (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantanen, T. (2005) The Media and Globalization (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, S. D. (2008) ‘Theorizing a globalized journalism’. In M. Loeffelholz and D. Weaver (eds) Global Journalism Research: Theories, Methods, Findings, Future (London: Blackwell), 240–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B. andRagin, C.C. (eds) (2008) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Thousand Oaks: Sage), 240–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straubhaar, J. (2007) World Television: From Global to Local (Los Angeles: Sage)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1984) Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons (Los Angeles: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall, J. (2008) The Media Were American (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F.J.R., van Hemert, D.A. and Poortinga, Y.H. (2008) ‘Conceptual issues in multilevel models’. In F.J.R. van de Vijver, DA. van Hemert and Poortinga, Y.H. (eds) Multilevel Analysis of Individuals and Cultures (New York: Lawrence Erlbaum), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkmer, I. (2012) ‘Deconstructing the methodological paradox, comparative research between national centrality and networked spaces’. In I. Volkmer (ed.) The Handbook of Global Media Research (Maiden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell), 110–122.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Voltmer, K. (2008) ‘Democratization, role of the media’. In C. Holtz-Bacha And L.L. Kaid (eds) Encyclopedia of Political Communication (London, UK: Sage), 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltmer, K. (2012) The Media in Transitional Democracies (Cambridge, UK: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, H. and Brüggemann, M. (2012) Transnationale Kommunikation: Eine Einführung [Transnational Communication: An Introduction](Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Frank Esser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University Complutense Madrid, Spain

    María José Canel

  2. University of Leeds, UK

    Katrin Voltmer

Copyright information

© 2014 Frank Esser

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Esser, F. (2014). Methodological Challenges in Comparative Communication Research: Advancing Cross-National Research in Times of Globalization. In: Canel, M.J., Voltmer, K. (eds) Comparing Political Communication across Time and Space. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137366474_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation