Abstract
Over the past decades, UNESCO has produced several international cultural conventions, which jointly aim to provide a solid basis for the protection and promotion of cultural diversity. The UN cultural agency declares the promotion of cultural diversity—the “common humanity heritage” according to the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity (2001)—and its corollary, dialogue, one of the most pressing contemporary issues and, for this reason, central to the organization’s mandate. The promotion of cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue by way of rhetoric is straightforward. UNESCO’s successive Directors-General have appealed to governments and peoples around the world to respect and protect cultural expressions and engage in cross-cultural dialogue and exchanges. Yet in practice, as the four case studies have demonstrated, the promotion and protection of cultural diversity is confronted with a number of challenges and obstacles, some external and some inherent in UNESCO itself. The organization’s role in handling cultural diversity cannot be properly assessed without analyzing them in the light of what the organization is doing and what it is failing to do and why.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Pierre Michel Eisemann (2007), “Introduction to Panel 1: Elaborating and Implementing UNESCO’s Standard-setting Instruments,” in Abdulqawi Yusuf (ed.), Standard-setting in UNESCO: Normative Action in Education, Science and Culture; Essays in Commemoration of the Sixtieth Anniversary of UNESCO (Paris; Leiden, Netherlands: UNESCO, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers), p. 28.
Laurence Boisson de Chazournes (2007), “Monitoring, Supervision and Coordination of the Standard-setting Instruments of UNESCO,” in Abdulqawi Yusuf (ed.), Standard-setting in UNESCO: Normative Action in Education, Science and Culture; Essays in Commemoration of the Sixtieth Anniversary of UNESCO pp. 51–73 (Paris; Leiden, Netherlands: UNESCO, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers), p. 60.
UNESCO (2010e), Report on the Independent External Evaluation of UNESCO. Document 185 EX/18. Executive Board of UNESCO, 185th session, October 5–21, 2010 (Paris), p. 5.
Paul M. Kennedy (2006), The Parliament of Man: The United Nations and the Quest for World Government (London: Allen Lane), p. 274.
Christian Reus-Smit (1999), The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
UN (2010), Culture and Development. Resolution 65/166. United Nations General Assembly, 65th session, December 20, 2010 (New York).
Jongsuk Chay (1990), Culture and International Relations (New York: Praeger), p. 271.
UNESCO (2010d), The Power of Culture for Development (Paris: UNESCO), p. 5.
Martina Nibbeling-Wriebnig (2010), Germany’s Intervention at the 185th Session of the Executive Board of UNESCO. Executive Board of UNESCO, 185th session, October 12, 2010 (Paris).
Mark Mazower (2009), No Enchanted Palace: The End of Empire and the Ideological Origins of the United Nations (Princeton, NJ; Oxford Princeton University Press), p. 11.
Inis L. Claude, Jr. (1964), Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization (New York: Random House), p. 17–20.
Andrew Hurrell (2002), “Foreword to the Third Edition of Hedley Bull, ‘The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics,” in The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave), p. xix.
Ivan Bernier and Hélène Ruiz Ruiz Fabri (2006), “Implementing the Convention,” in Nina Obuljen and Joost Smiers (eds.), UNESCO’s Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: Making It Work (Zagreb: Institute for International Relations), p. 168.
Rostam Neuwirth agrees: “Legally, the rights and obligations set forth in the Convention on the Diversity of Cultural Expressions add nothing useful to the objective of protecting and promoting the diversity of cultural expression.” Neuwirth. Rostam J. Neuwirth (2012), “The Convention on the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: A Critical Analysis of the Provisions.” in Toshiyuki Kono and Steven Van Uytsel (eds.), The UNESCO Convention on the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: A Tale of Fragmentation in International Law, pp. 45–69 (Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia).
Laurence Mayer-Robitaille (2008), Le statut juridique des biens et services culturels dans les accords commerciaux internationaux (Paris: L’Harmattan), p. 462.
WTO (2009), “China: Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products – AB-2009–3 – Report of the Appellate Body,” WT/DS363/AB/R, December 21, 2009, available at: www.wto.org, accessed January 26, 2011.
UNESCO (2008b), Medium-Term Strategy for 2008–2013 (34 C/4) (Paris: UNESCO), p. 25.
Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (2005), Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003), Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001), Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972), Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (1970), Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (1954), and Universal Copyright Convention (1952 and 1971). UNESCO (2008b), Medium-Term Strategy for 2008–2013, p. 25.
Hedley Bull (2002), The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave), pp. 16–17.
UNESCO (2008b), Medium-Term Strategy for 2008–2013, p. 28.
Christopher Moseley, Alexandre Nicolas, and UNESCO (2010), Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger (Paris: UNESCO Publishing). An interactive version is also available online at: www.unesco.org/culture/languages-atlas/en/atlasmap.html, accessed September 28, 2013.
The Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, negotiated in 1994, is an international agreement administered by the World Trade Organization that sets down minimum standards for many forms of intellectual property regulation. Mira T. Sundara Rajan (2008), “Strange Bedfellows: Law and Culture in the Digital Age,” in Helmut K. Anheier et al. (eds.), The Cultural Economy, pp. 67–82 (London: SAGE).
Nye (2008), “Culture, Soft Power, and ‘Americanization,’” in David Held and Henrietta L. Moore (eds.), Cultural Politics in a Global Age. Uncertainty, Solidarity, and Innovation (Oxford: Oneworld Publications), p. 175.
Remaining, however, significantly understudied in the disciplines of international relations and social sciences more broadly. Notable exceptions include Scott Thomas (2005b), The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations: The Struggle for the Soul of the Twenty-first Century (New York; Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan);
Jonathan Fox and Shmuel Sandler (2004), Bringing Religion into International Relations (New York; Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; Palgrave);
and Pavlos Hatzopoulos and Fabio Petito (2003), Religion in International Relations: The Return from Exile (New York; Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
UNESCO (2010e), Report on the Independent External Evaluation of UNESCO, p. 2.
UNESCO (2008b), Medium-Term Strategy for 2008–2013, p. 26.
UNESCO (2010e), Report on the Independent External Evaluation of UNESCO, p. 3.
This is supplemented by $42,581,000 of committed extrabudget-ary funds, a big part of which—$28,344,000—is assigned toward the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO (2012a), Approved Programme and Budget, 2012–2013 (36 C/5) (UNESCO: Paris), p. 146.
UNESCO (2010e), Report on the Independent External Evaluation of UNESCO, p. 4.
Copyright information
© 2014 Irena Kozymka
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kozymka, I. (2014). UNESCO’s Difficulties in Handling Cultural Diversity. In: The Diplomacy of Culture. Culture and Religion in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137366269_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137366269_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47411-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36626-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)