Abstract
Since the end of the Cold War, culture and identity rather than ideology have been increasingly recognized as key forces shaping global order. The rise of identity politics and religious revivalism have been feeding debates on the “clash of civilizations” and Islam’s challenges to the West. In parallel, debates have been focusing on globalization, broadly defined as an empirical process of increasing worldwide economic, political, technological, and cultural interconnectedness. Globalization’s impact on culture has been viewed as both a blessing and a curse: on the one hand offering unprecedented opportunities for interactive and enriching cultural exchanges and therefore increasing cultural diversity, and on the other leading to uniformity or tensions between cultures.1 In many parts of the world, globalization is perceived as a threat to national cultures and traditional forms of identity.2 As a result and contrary to earlier predictions of “the end of history,” the forces of globalization appear to be more nurturing than destructive of the reaffirmation of sovereignties and, in reaction, of the demands for recognition of regional and local differences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Recent titles include JoAnn Chirico (2013), Globalization: Prospects and Problems (London: SAGE);
Nadia Kiwan and Ulrike Hanna Meinhof (2011), Cultural Globalization and Music: African Artists in Transnational Networks (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan);
Simon Murden (2011), “Culture in World Affairs,” in John Baylis et al. (eds.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, pp. 414–427 (New York: Oxford University Press);
and Robert J. Holton (2011), Globalization and the Nation State (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 189–219.
Andrew Heywood (2011), Global Politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 136–156.
With a few exceptions, for example, J. P. Singh (2011), Globalized Arts: The Entertainment Economy and Cultural Identity (New York: Columbia University).
Notable exceptions include Nina Obuljen and Joost Smiers (eds.) (2006), UNESCO’s Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: Making It Work (Zagreb: Institute for International Relations);
Laurence Mayer-Robitaille (2008), Le statut juridique des biens et services culturels dans les accords commerciaux internationaux (Paris: L’Harmattan);
and Toshiyuki Kono and Steven Van Uytsel (eds.) (2012), The UNESCO Convention on the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: A Tale of Fragmentation in International Law (Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia). Their focus, however, is narrowed to the above-mentioned Convention without presenting a broader picture of the merits and shortfalls of UNESCO’s action in favor of cultural diversity.
Seyla Benhabib (2002), The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era (Princeton, NJ; Oxford: Princeton University Press), p. 1.
Paul Hopper (2007), Understanding Cultural Globalization (Cambridge: Polity), p. 48.
Copyright information
© 2014 Irena Kozymka
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kozymka, I. (2014). Introduction. In: The Diplomacy of Culture. Culture and Religion in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137366269_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137366269_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47411-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36626-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)