Advertisement

Out of the Blue: The Campaign in Retrospect

  • Philip Cowley
  • Dennis Kavanagh

Abstract

The Conservative election victory of 2015 overturned many expectations. It had been widely expected that the fragmentation of the party system would produce yet another hung parliament, out of which would emerge another coalition or post-election deal. The era of one-party majority government seemed to be over. David Cameron’s victory also belied predictions — made, for example, by Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England — that the measures needed to deal with the economy would be so unpopular that they would keep the winner of the 2010 election out of office for a generation.1

Keywords

Electoral System Vote Share Party System Election Campaign Labour Government 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 5.
    Andrew Gamble, ‘The Economy’ in Andrew Geddes and Jon Tonge (eds), Britain Votes 2015. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    I. McLean, ‘The Problem of Proportionate Swing’, Political Studies, 21(1) (1973): 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 9.
    J. Curtice, ‘A Defeat to Reckon with: On Scotland, Economic Competence, and the Complexities of Labour’s Losses’, Juncture, 22(1) (2015): 42–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 14.
    P. Dunleavy, ‘The Political Implications of Sectoral Cleavages and the Growth of State Employment: Part 2, Cleavage Structures and Political Alignment’, Political Studies, 28(4) (1980): 527–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 17.
    S. Fisher, A. Heath, D. Sanders and M. Sobolewska, ‘Candidate Ethnicity and Vote Choice in Britain’, British Journal of Political Science, 45(4) (2015): 883–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 20.
    See, for example, T. Smith, ‘Are You Sitting Comfortably? Estimating Incumbency Advantage in the UK: 1983–2010 — A Research Note’, Electoral Studies, 32(1) (2013): 167–73 and citations therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 39.
    S. Fisher and J. Curtice, ‘Tactical Unwind? Changes in Party Preference Structure and Tactical Voting from 2001 to 2005’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 16(1) (2006): 55–76 and citations therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 54.
    Curtice, Fisher and Ford, ‘Appendix 2’, pp. 410–17. See also M. Thrasher, G. Borisyuk, C. Rallings and R. Johnston, ‘Electoral Bias at the 2010 General Election: Evaluating its Extent in a Three-Party System’, Electoral Studies, 21(2) (2011): 279–94.Google Scholar
  9. 64.
    J. Curtice, ‘So What Went Wrong with the Electoral System? The 2010 Election Result and the Debate about Electoral Reform’, Parliamentary Affairs, 68(suppl 1) (2010), 623–38.Google Scholar
  10. See C. Soper and J. Rydon, ‘Under-Representation and Electoral Prediction’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 4(1) (1958): 94–106.Google Scholar
  11. J. Loosemore and V. Hanby, ‘The Theoretical Limits of Maximum Distortion: Some Analytic Expressions for Electoral Systems’, British Journal of Political Science, 1(4) (1971): 467–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Gallagher, ‘Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems’, Electoral Studies, 10(1) (1991): 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Cowley
    • 1
  • Dennis Kavanagh
    • 2
  1. 1.Queen Mary University of LondonUK
  2. 2.University of LiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations