Skip to main content

Introduction: Security Sector Reform in Southeast Asia

  • Chapter
Security Sector Reform in Southeast Asia

Part of the book series: Critical Studies of the Asia Pacific Series ((CSAP))

  • 182 Accesses

Abstract

As a region, Southeast Asia has been somewhat of a latecomer with regard to what Huntington termed the “third wave of democratization” (Huntington 1991). This striking rush of political change started in Southern Europe in the 1970s, reached the military dictatorships of the Latin Americas in the 1980s and, most notably, fostered the democratization processes in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in 1989/90. The so-called third wave did not topple authoritarian regimes in Southeast Asia until the second half of the 1980s (the Philippines), the early 1990s (Thailand) and the late 1990s (Indonesia, Timor-Leste). Despite the fact that various Southeast Asian countries, most notably Indonesia, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Cambodia and the Philippines, have undergone significant transformation processes throughout the last two to three decades, the results of the transformation processes have nonetheless proven not to be irreversible. The potential fragility of the democratic transitions in the region has most clearly been exemplified by the coup d’état launched by the Thai military in 2006, which removed the government of Thaksin Shinawatra from power. What’s more, the so-called third wave did not reach the shores of Myanmar’s military dictatorship. So far it has also, arguably, had few transformative effects on Singapore, Malaysia and Brunei, and has had even less of an impact on Vietnam and Laos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Acharya, Amitav. 2000. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alagappa, Muthiah. 2001. “Investigating and Explaining Change: An Analytical Framework”. In Coercion and Governance: The Declining Political Role of the Military in Asia, ed. Muthiah Alagappa. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 29–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, Nicole. 2010. “The Evolution of the Security Sector Reform Agenda”. In The Future of Security Sector Reform, ed. Mark Sedra. Waterloo: The Centre for International Governance Innovation, 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, Mark. 2008. “Civil-Military Relations in Indonesia and the Philippines: Will the Thai Coup Prove Contagious?” Armed Forces & Society 34(3): 474–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, Mark, and Alex J. Bellamy. 2007. Securing Southeast Asia: The Politics of Security Sector Reform. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, Alex J., and Bryn Hughes. 2007. “Emancipation and Force: The Role(s) of the Military in Southeast Asia”. In Critical Security in the Asia Pacific, ed. Anthony Burke and Matt McDonald. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, Daniel, and Ruth Stanley. 2008. “Deconstructing Local Ownership of Security Sector Reform: A Review of the Literature”. African Security Review 17(2): 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born, Hans. 2009. “Security Sector Reform in Challenging Environments: Insights from Comparative Analysis”. In Security Sector Reform in Challenging Environments (Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces), ed. Hans Born and Albrecht Schnabel. Berlin: Lit, 241–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumberg, Daniel, and Hesham Sallam. 2012. The Politics of Security Sector Reform in Egypt. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace. USIP Special Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryden, Alan, and Funmi Olonisakin. 2010a. “Enabling Security Sector Transformation in Africa”. In Security Sector Transformation in Africa, ed. Alan Bryden and Funmi Olonisakin. Berlin: Lit, 219–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, eds. 2010b. Security Sector Transformation in Africa. Berlin: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzoska, Michael. 2006. “Introduction: Criteria for Evaluating Post-conflict Reconstruction and Security Sector Reform in Peace Support Operations”. International Peacekeeping 13(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunbongkarn, Suchit. 2004. “The Military and Democracy in Thailand”. In The Military and Democracy in Asia and the Pacific, ed. R. J. May and Viberto Selochan. Canberra: ANU E Press, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawthra, Gavin. 2003. “Security Transformation in Post-Apartheid South Africa”. In Governing Insecurity: Democratic Control of Military and Security Establishments in Transitional Democracies, ed. Gavin Cawthra and Robin Luckham. London: Zed Books, 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Paul. 2010. “Thailand on the Brink: Resurgent Military, Eroded Democracy”. Asian Survey 50(5): 835–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2011. “Where Agency Meets Structure: Understanding Civil-Military Relations in Contemporary Thailand”. Asian Journal of Political Science 19(3): 290–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connors, Michael K. 2008. “Thailand — Four Elections and a Coup”. Australian Journal of International Affairs 62(4): 478–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connors, Michael K., and Kevin Hewison. 2007. “Introduction: Thailand and the ‘good Coup’”. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38(1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, Aurel. 2013. “Coups and Post-coup Politics in South-East Asia and the Pacific: Conceptual and Comparative Perspectives”. Australian Journal of International Affairs 67(3): 264–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, Aurel, David Kuehn, Paul Chambers, and Siegfried O. Wolf. 2010. “Beyond the Fallacy of Coup-ism: Conceptualizing Civilian Control of the Military in Emerging Democracies”. Democratization 17(5): 950–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, Aurel, David Kuehn, and Philip Lorenz. 2012. Breaking with the Past? Civil-Military Relations in the Emerging Democracies of East Asia. Honolulu: East-West Center. Policy Studies 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Harold. 1988. The Army and Politics in Indonesia. 2nd ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz de Castro, Renato. 2005. “Congressional Intervention in Philippine Post-Cold War Defense Policy”. Philippine Political Science Journal 25(4): 79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damian, Matthieu, and Heinz Vetschera. 2006. “Security Sector Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Role of the International Community”. International Peacekeeping 13(1): 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denney, Lisa. 2011. “Reducing Poverty with Teargas and Batons: The Security-Development Nexus in Sierra Leone”. African Affairs 110(439): 275–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donais, Timothy. 2009. “Inclusion or Exclusion? Local Ownership and Security Sector Reform”. Studies in Social Justice 3(1): 117–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dursun-Ozkanca, Oya, and Antoine Vandemoortele. 2012. “The European Union and Security Sector Reform: Current Practices and Challenges of Implementation”. European Security 21(2): 139–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egnell, Robert, and Peter Haldén. 2009. “Laudable, Ahistorical and Overambitious: Security Sector Reform Meets State Formation Theory.” Conflict, Security & Development 9(1): 27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gbla, Osman. 2006. “Security Sector Reform under International Tutelage in Sierra Leone”. International Peacekeeping 13(1): 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiduk, Felix. 2009. “Two Sides of the Same Coin? Separatism and Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia”. In Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia, Routledge contemporary Southeast Asia series, ed. Marco Bünte and Andreas Ufen. London: Routledge, 295–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2011. “From Guardians to Democrats? Attempts to Explain Change and Continuity in the Civil-Military Relations of Post-Authoritarian Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines”. The Pacific Review 24(2): 249–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, Carolina. 2007. “The Military in Philippine Politics”. In Whither the Philippines in the 21st Century?, ed. Rodolfo C. Severino and Lorraine Carlos Salazar. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Caroline. 2009. Dependent Communities: Aid and Politics in Cambodia and East Timor. Ithaca: Cornell SEAP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel. 2006. Political Order in Changing Societies. Rev. ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Paul. 2011. “Security Sector Reform and State Building”. Third World Quarterly 32(10): 1803–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Paul, and Peter Albrecht. 2010. Reconstructing Security after Conflict: Security Sector Reform in Sierra Leone. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, Morris. 1988. Military Institutions and Coercion in the Developing Nations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justaert, Arnout, and Stephan Keukeleire. 2010. “The EU’s Security Sector Reform Policies in the Democratic Republic of Congo”. European Integration Online Papers 14(1): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempin, Ronja, and Stefan Reinicke. 2009. “EUPOL Afghanistan: The Credibility-Test for Europe’s Civilian Engagement”. In The EU as a Strategic Actor in the Realm of Security and Defence? A Systematic Assessment of ESDP Missions and Operations, SWP Research Paper 14, Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhonta, Erik Martinez, Dan Slater, and Tuong Vu. 2008. “Introduction: The Contributions of Southeast Asian Political Studies”. In Southeast Asia in Political Science: Theory, Region, and Qualitative Analysis, ed. Erik Kuhonta, Dan Slater, and Tong Vu. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larivé, Maxime H. A. 2012. “From Speeches to Actions: EU Involvement in the War in Afghanistan through the EUPOL Afghanistan Mission”. European Security 21(2): 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, David. 2007. “Intergovernmental Organisations and Their Role in Security Sector Reform”. In Intergovernmental Organisations and Security Sector Reform, ed. David Law. Berlin: Lit, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Terence. 2008. “The Military’s Corporate Interests: The Main Reason for Intervention in Indonesia and the Philippines?” Armed Forces & Society 34(3): 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, Kristina. 2007. “Militaries in Business: State-Making and Entrepreneurship in the Developing World”. Armed Forces & Society 33(4): 591–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. J., and Viberto Selochan. 2004. “Introduction: Democracy and the Military in Comparative Perspective”. In The Military and Democracy in Asia and the Pacific, ed. R. J. May and Alberto Selochan. Canberra: ANU E Press, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlingen, Michael, and Rasa Ostrauskaite. 2006. European Union Peacebuilding and Policing: Governance and the European Security and Defence Policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mietzner, Marcus. 2006. The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance. Washington, D.C.: East-West Center Washington. Policy Studies 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2011. “Overcoming Path Dependence: The Quality of Civilian Control of the Military in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia”. Asian Journal of Political Science 19(3): 270–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobekk, Eirin. 2009. “Security Sector Reform and the UN Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Protecting Civilians in the East”. International Peacekeeping 16(2): 273–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlmann, Thomas. 2008. “Police Restructuring in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Problems of Internationally-led Security Sector Reform”. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 2(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Tonita. 2007. “Police-Building in Afghanistan: A Case Study of Civil Security Reform”. International Peacekeeping 14(1): 108–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustapha, Jennifer. 2011. “Threat Construction in the Bush Administration’s Post-9/11 Foreign Policy: (Critical) Security Implications for Southeast Asia”. The Pacific Review 24(4): 487–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlinger, Eric A. 1977. Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD Development Assistance Committee (OECD DAC). 2007. Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onana, Renner, and Hannah Taylor. 2008. “MONUC and SSR in the Democratic Republic of Congo”. International Peacekeeping 15(4): 501–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panarelli, Liz. 2010. Local Ownership of Security Sector Reform. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace. USIP Peace Briefs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peake, Gordon. 2008. “Police Reform and Reconstruction in Timor-Leste: A Difficult Do-over”. In Policing Developing Democracies, ed. Mercedes S. Hinton and Tim Newburn. London: Routledge, 141–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Barry J. 2009. “The EU’s Emergent Security-First Agenda: Securing Albania and Montenegro”. Security Dialogue 40(3): 311–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel, Albrecht. 2010. “Ideal Requirements versus Real Environments in Security Sector Reform”. In Security Sector Reform in Challenging Environments (Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces), ed. Hans Born and Albrecht Schnabel. Berlin: Lit, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, Ursula. 2007. “Between Conflict and Cooperation: International Police Reform Efforts in South Eastern Europe”. In Intergovernmental Organizations and Security Sector Reform, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF), ed. Daniel M. Law. Berlin: Lit, 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian, Leonard C. 2006. Realpolitik Ideology: Indonesia’s Use of Military Force. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedra, Mark. 2006. “European Approaches to Security Sector Reform: Examining Trends through the Lens of Afghanistan”. European Security 15(3): 323–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, ed. 2010a. The Future of Security Sector Reform. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2010b. “Towards Second Generation Security Sector Reform”. In The Future of Security Sector Reform, ed. Mark Sedra. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation, 102–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, Jake. 2010. “The ‘Global War on Terrorism’ and Its Implications for US Security Sector Reform Support”. In The Future of Security Sector Reform, ed. Mark Sedra. Waterloo: The Centre for International Governance Innovation, 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, Edward, and John J. Johnson. 1962. The Military in the Political Development of the New States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonsen, Sven Gunnar. 2009. “The Role of East Timor’s Security Institutions in National Integration — and Disintegration”. The Pacific Review 22(5): 575–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Chris. 2001. “Security-sector Reform: Development Breakthrough or Institutional Engineering?” Conflict, Security & Development 1(1): 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, Richard. 2008. “The ASEAN Alternative? Ideas, Institutions and the Challenge to ‘global’ Governance”. The Pacific Review 21(4): 451–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundhausen, Ulf. 1985. “The Durability of Military Regimes in Southeast Asia”. In Military-Civilian Relations in South-East Asia, ed. Zakaria bin Haji Ahmad and Harold A. Crouch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tholens, Simone. 2012. “Which and Whose Authority? EU Support to Security Governance in Aceh”. European Security 21(2): 294–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. 2008. Securing Peace and Development: The Role of the United Nations in Supporting Security Sector Reform. New York: United Nations General Assembly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, Arturo. 1985. “A Note on the Military and Social Science Theory”. Third World Quarterly 7(1): 132–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, Susan. 2003. “In Whose Interest Is Security Sector Reform? Lessons from the Balkans”. In Governing Insecurity: Democratic Control of Military and Security Establishments in Transitional Democracies, ed. Gavin Cawthra and Robin Luckham. London: Zed Books, 276–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyck, Steven. 2011. “Review Article: Explaining SSR’s Dearth of Success Stories”. Conflict, Security & Development 11(4): 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Felix Heiduk

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heiduk, F. (2014). Introduction: Security Sector Reform in Southeast Asia. In: Heiduk, F. (eds) Security Sector Reform in Southeast Asia. Critical Studies of the Asia Pacific Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137365491_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics