Skip to main content
  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

Reading is always the issue in confronting T.S. Eliot’s difficult poetry, The Waste Land being a prime example. The matter may resolve itself into a question of the movement of the poet’s imagination. In this regard, assisted by both statements in his essays and the example of his poetic practice, we may not locate a road map to his intentions, but likely to help is a focus attentive to verbal details, engaging in active comparison of words, images, and passages, and leading to prolonged “meditation.” Shown here to be a satire, Eliot’s most famous and probably most influential poem itself connects with several of his essays written around the same time in seeking to “associate” the separated, to “amalgamate disparate experience,” and to make such connections as the wastelanders are unable to or will not make.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. T.S. Eliot and Valerie Eliot, The Waste Land: A Facsimile and Transcript of the Original Drafts Including the Annotations of Ezra Pound (London: Faber and Faber, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ezra Pound, “Arnaut Daniel,” Instigations (New York: Boni and Liveright, 1920), 286.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T.S. Eliot, introductory essay, “London: A Poem” and “The Vanity of Human Wishes,” Samuel Johnson (London: Frederick Etchells and Hugh Macdonald, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.S. Eliot, “Ulysses, Order, and Myth,” The Dial, n.s. (Fall 1959), 153–58 (originally published in The Dial, November 1923).

    Google Scholar 

  5. T.S. Eliot, preface, Anabasis, St.-J. Perse, trans. Eliot (London: Faber and Faber, 1930), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T.S. Eliot, “The Metaphysical Poets,” Selected Essays, 3rd. edn (London: Faber and Faber, 1951), 289 (italics added).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., 287.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.S. Eliot, The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism (London: Methuen, 1920), 33.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See, esp., my T.S. Eliot Materialized: Literal Meaning and Embodied Truth (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. T.S. Eliot, “Lancelot Andrewes,” Selected Essays, 347.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paul J. Griffiths, Religious Reading: The Place of Reading in the Practice of Religion (New York: Oxford UP, 1999), 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eliot, “Lancelot Andrewes,” 347–48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Griffiths, Religious Reading, ix.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.B. White, foreword, Essays (New York: Harper and Row, 1977), vii.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T.S. Eliot, preface, Thoughts for Meditation: A Way to Recovery from Within, sel. and arr. N. Gangulee (London: Faber and Faber, 1951), 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., 13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 G. Douglas Atkins

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Atkins, G.D. (2013). The Vanity of Human Wishes. In: T.S. Eliot and the Failure to Connect: Satire and Modern Misunderstandings. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137364692_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics