Abstract
Reading is always the issue in confronting T.S. Eliot’s difficult poetry, The Waste Land being a prime example. The matter may resolve itself into a question of the movement of the poet’s imagination. In this regard, assisted by both statements in his essays and the example of his poetic practice, we may not locate a road map to his intentions, but likely to help is a focus attentive to verbal details, engaging in active comparison of words, images, and passages, and leading to prolonged “meditation.” Shown here to be a satire, Eliot’s most famous and probably most influential poem itself connects with several of his essays written around the same time in seeking to “associate” the separated, to “amalgamate disparate experience,” and to make such connections as the wastelanders are unable to or will not make.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
T.S. Eliot and Valerie Eliot, The Waste Land: A Facsimile and Transcript of the Original Drafts Including the Annotations of Ezra Pound (London: Faber and Faber, 1971).
Ezra Pound, “Arnaut Daniel,” Instigations (New York: Boni and Liveright, 1920), 286.
T.S. Eliot, introductory essay, “London: A Poem” and “The Vanity of Human Wishes,” Samuel Johnson (London: Frederick Etchells and Hugh Macdonald, 1930).
T.S. Eliot, “Ulysses, Order, and Myth,” The Dial, n.s. (Fall 1959), 153–58 (originally published in The Dial, November 1923).
T.S. Eliot, preface, Anabasis, St.-J. Perse, trans. Eliot (London: Faber and Faber, 1930), 8.
Ibid.
T.S. Eliot, “The Metaphysical Poets,” Selected Essays, 3rd. edn (London: Faber and Faber, 1951), 289 (italics added).
Ibid., 287.
T.S. Eliot, The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism (London: Methuen, 1920), 33.
See, esp., my T.S. Eliot Materialized: Literal Meaning and Embodied Truth (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).
T.S. Eliot, “Lancelot Andrewes,” Selected Essays, 347.
Paul J. Griffiths, Religious Reading: The Place of Reading in the Practice of Religion (New York: Oxford UP, 1999), 40–45.
Eliot, “Lancelot Andrewes,” 347–48.
Griffiths, Religious Reading, ix.
Ibid.
E.B. White, foreword, Essays (New York: Harper and Row, 1977), vii.
T.S. Eliot, preface, Thoughts for Meditation: A Way to Recovery from Within, sel. and arr. N. Gangulee (London: Faber and Faber, 1951), 11–12.
Ibid., 12–13.
Ibid., 13.
Copyright information
© 2013 G. Douglas Atkins
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Atkins, G.D. (2013). The Vanity of Human Wishes. In: T.S. Eliot and the Failure to Connect: Satire and Modern Misunderstandings. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137364692_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137364692_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47740-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36469-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)