Abstract
As pointed out in Chapter 1 the League was not founded as a trade union but eventually chose to become one in 1899. Even after this its aims were never limited to regulating industrial relations and it took a while before it fully developed its identity as a trade union. The League’s hostility towards charity, on the other hand, remained the one constant element in the organisation’s long history and its defining characteristic. Becoming a trade union had also been a way for the League to express this hostility as trade union status and charity were deemed to be mutually exclusive. The Blind Persons Act of 1920, however, forced the members of the League to reconsider their dichotomous world view. As discussed, the Act made it mandatory for organisations dedicated to the welfare of blind people to formally register as a charity before publicly appealing for donations or subscriptions, or raising money in other ways. In addition, the Blind Persons Act also cut the League off from the decision-making process at Whitehall. The Government Advisory Committee on the Welfare of the Blind was reconstituted in April 1921 so that County and County Borough Councils, Boards of Guardians and charitable organisations could advise the Minister of Health on ‘matters relating to the care and supervising of the Blind, including any questions that may be specifically referred to them by the Minister’.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
David Gilbert, ‘The Landscape of Spencerism: Mining Politics in the Nottingham Coalfield, 1910–1947’, in Alan Campbell, Nina Fishman and David Howell (eds), Miners, Unions and Politics, 1910–47 (Aldershot, 1996), pp. 175–97; Clegg, A History of British Trade Unions since 1889, Vol. II, pp. 417 and 445–9.
Clinton briefly mentions the episode in his monograph but claims that the split took place in 1934, gives the wrong title for the breakaway union and claims inaccurately that ‘it was the Leeds Trades Council that arranged a meeting between the warring groups that settled the dispute’. Alan Clinton, The Trade Union Rank and File: Trades Councils in Britain, 1900–40 (Manchester, 1977), pp. 173–4.
Clegg, A History of British Trade Unions since 1889, Vol. II, pp. 452–5; Henry Pelling, A History of British Trade Unionism (London, 1992), p. 187; Fraser, A History of British Trade Unionism, pp. 168–9.
Clinton, Trades Councils in Britain, pp. 138–56; Richard Stevens, ‘Containing Radicalism: The Trades Union Congress Organisation Department and Trades Councils, 1928–1953’, Labour History Review Vol. 62(1) (Spring 1997): 5–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Matthias Reiss
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reiss, M. (2015). Mutually Exclusive Principles? Trade Unionism and Charity. In: Blind Workers against Charity. Palgrave Studies in the History of Social Movements. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137364470_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137364470_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47330-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36447-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)