Interpreting the End of Traditional Burma

  • Stephen L. Keck
Part of the Britain and the World book series (BAW)


British rule over all of Burma required the termination of the Konbaung Dynasty.1 This overt political transformation was as dramatic as it was decisive, but the country was also undergoing massive social transformations, brought about by rapid economic development. These alterations affected every aspect of Burma, including the interpretations of its past. This chapter focuses upon the ways in which the British conceptualized Burma’s past. The immediate priority would be to understand recent history—that which had occurred between the Second and Third Anglo-Burmese Wars. A second larger aim, which reflected the pressures which arose from modernization, addressed comprehending Burma’s more remote past.


Archaeological Survey British Rule Remote Past Historic Preservation Historical Writing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Albert Fytche, C.S.E., Burma Past and Present. 2 vols. (London: C. Kegan Paul & Co., 1878), p. 66.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Sir Arthur P. Phayre, History of Burma: From the Earliest Times to the End of the First War with British India. Originally published in 1883. Reprinted (London and Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Susil Gupta, 1967).Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    G. E. Mitton, Scott of the Shan Hills: Orders and Impressions (London: John Murray, 1936).Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    Andrew Dalby, “J.G. Scott (1851–1935): Explorer of Burma’s Eastern Boundaries” in Victor T. King (ed.), Explorers of South-East Asia: Six Lives (Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1995), pp. 108–57.Google Scholar
  5. 18.
    David Lowenthal. The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 19.
    David Cannadine, Ornamentalism: How the British Saw Their Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  7. 24.
    Sir Thomas Raleigh (editor), Lord Curzon in India1898–1905 (London: Macmillan and Company, 1906), pp. 183–5.Google Scholar
  8. 45.
    Su Lin Lewis, “Between Orientalism and Nationalism: the Learned Society and the Making of Southeast Asia”, Modern Intellectual History, 10, 2 (2013), pp. 361–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 47.
    Maung May Oung, “Inaugural Address of the Burma Research Society”, Journal of the Burma Research Society, 1, 1 (1911), p. 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Stephen L. Keck 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen L. Keck
    • 1
  1. 1.Emirates Diplomatic AcademyUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations