Skip to main content

Abstract

When a lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of a statute, the first step for the government is usually to file a “motion to dismiss,” which is an argument that a case should be thrown out because the plaintiffs’ arguments are simply not good enough to hold the court’s attention. A successful motion to dismiss can kill a case before it even gets off the ground. Many legal academics predicted that the challenge to Obamacare would not even survive a motion to dismiss, which is an almost sneering way of indicating how bad they thought the arguments against the law were.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 34.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Trevor Burrus

Copyright information

© 2013 Randy E. Barnett, Jonathan H. Adler, David E. Bernstein, Orin S. Kerr, David B. Kopel, Ilya Somin, and Trevor Burrus

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barnett, R.E., Adler, J.H., Bernstein, D.E., Kerr, O.S., Kopel, D.B., Somin, I. (2013). The First Decisions. In: Burrus, T. (eds) A Conspiracy Against Obamacare. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137363732_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics