Summary
This chapter aims to defend the thesis that we can only perceive what we understand. Such a theory would seem to be unable to account for our learning to perceive what we do not yet understand. To address this objection, the paper presents a non-representationalist, direct realist theory of perception. In this, the sensorimotor theory of Noë and O’Regan plays a crucial role (although one important modification to the interpretation of that theory is proposed). The result is an account of how we are in contact with the world itself during perceptual experi- ence; and this leads to an account of how the world itself guides our understanding, as we move from non-sense to sense.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beaton, M. (2009). An Analysis of Qualitative Feel as the Introspectible Subjective Aspect of a Space of Reasons (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Beaton, M. (2013). Phenomenology and embodied action. Constructivist Foundations, 8(3), 298–313.
Beaton, M. (in prep.). Conceptualism and animal minds.
Beer, R. D. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive behavior, 11(4), 209–243.
Bimbenet, E. (2009). Merleau-Ponty and the quarrel over the conceptual contents of perception. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 30(1), 59–77.
Byrne, A., & Logue, H. (Eds). (2009). Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carroll, L. (1895). What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind, 4(14), 278–280.
Chuard, P. (2006). Demonstrative concepts without re-identification. Philosophical Studies, 130, 153–201.
Davidson, D. (1973). Radical interpretation. Dialectica, 27, 313–328.
Davidson, D. (1974). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47, 5–20.
Dennett, D. C. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Di Paolo, E. A., Barandiaran, X., Beaton, M., & Buhrmann, T. (2014). Learning to perceive in the sensorimotor approach: Piaget’s theory of equilibration interpreted dynamically. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(551). doi: 10.3389/ fnhum.2014.00551.
Dienes, Z. (2012). Conscious versus unconscious learning of structure. In P. Rebuschat, & J. N. Williams (Eds), Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition (pp. 337–364). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
Dreyfus, H. L. (2005). Overcoming the myth of the mental: how philosophers can profit from the phenomenology of everyday expertise. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 79(2), 47–65.
Evans, G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Haddock, A., & Macpherson, F. (Eds) (2008). Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
anna, R. (2011). Beyond the myth of the myth: a Kantian theory of non-conceptual content. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 19(3), 323–398.
Heck, R. G. (2000). Non conceptual content and the “space of reasons”. Philosophical Review, 109(4), 483–523.
Hume, D. (1748/1999). An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hurley S. (2003). Animal action in the space of reasons. Mind & Language, 18(3), 231–256.
Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Izquierdo-Torres, E., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Is an embodied system ever purely reactive? In M. S. Capcanere, A. A. Freitas, P. J. Bentley C. G. Johnson, & J. Timmis (Eds), Advances in Artificial Life: 8 th European Conference, EC AL 2005 (pp. 252–261). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Kant, I. (1781/1787/1996). Critique of Pure Reason. (W. S. Pluhar, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
Kelly, S. D. (2001a). Demonstrative concepts and experience. Philosophical Review, 110(3), 397–420.
Kelly S. D. (2001b). The non-conceptual content of perceptual experience: situation dependence and fineness of grain. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62(3), 601–608.
Köhler, I. (1951/1964). The formation and transformation of the perceptual world. Psychological Issues, 3 (4, Monogr. No. 12), 1–173.
Lauer, D. (2013). Leiblichkeit und Begrifflichkeit. Ìberlegungen zum Begriff der Wahrnehmung nach McDowell und Merleau-Ponty. In K. Mertens, & I. Günzler (Eds), Wahrnehmen — Fühlen — Handeln: Phänomenologie im Wettstreit der Methoden (pp. 365–381). Münster, Germany: Mentis Verlag.
McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McDowell, J. (2007). What myth? Inquiry, 50(4), 338–351.
McDowell, J. (2009). Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McGregor, S. (inpress). Natural descriptions and anthropicbias: extant problems in Solomonoff induction. Language, Life, Limits — 10th Conference on Computability in Europe, CiE 2014, Budapest, Hungary, June 23 — 27, 2014. Proceedings. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Noë, A. (1999). Thought and experience. American Philosophical Quarterly, 36, 257–265.
Noë, A. (2002). Is the visual world a grand illusion? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(5-6), 1–12.
Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–1011.
Peacocke, C. (2001a). Does perception have a nonconceptual content? Journal of Philosophy, 98, 239–264.
Peacocke, C. (2001b). Phenomenology and nonconceptual content. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62(3), 609–615.
Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.
Rock, I. (1997). Indirect Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roskies, A. L. (2008). A new argument for nonconceptual content. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76(3), 633–659.
Roskies, A. L. (2010). “That” response doesn’t work: against a demonstrative defense of conceptualism. Nous, 44(1), 112–134.
Sandis, C. (2010). Basic actions and individuation. In T. O’Connor, & C. Sandis (Eds), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action (pp. 10–17). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1–66.
Sedivy, S. (2006). Nonconceptual epicycles. European Review of Philosophy, 6, 31–64.
Sedivy, S. (2008). Starting afresh disjunctively: perceptual engagement with the world. In A. Haddock, & R Macpherson (Eds), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge (pp. 348–375). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl, & M. Scriven (Eds), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume I: The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psycholog)’ and Psychoanalysis (pp. 253–329). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Shoemaker, S. (1988). On knowing one’s own mind. Philosophical Perspectives, 2, 183–209.
Thagard, P. (2006). Desires are not propositional attitudes. Dialogue, 45, 151–156.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2001). Philosophical Investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Michael Beaton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beaton, M. (2014). Learning to Perceive What We Do Not Yet Understand: Letting the World Guide Us. In: Cappuccio, M., Froese, T. (eds) Enactive Cognition at the Edge of Sense-Making. New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137363367_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137363367_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47298-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36336-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)