Skip to main content

Learning to Perceive What We Do Not Yet Understand: Letting the World Guide Us

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science ((NDPCS))

Summary

This chapter aims to defend the thesis that we can only perceive what we understand. Such a theory would seem to be unable to account for our learning to perceive what we do not yet understand. To address this objection, the paper presents a non-representationalist, direct realist theory of perception. In this, the sensorimotor theory of Noë and O’Regan plays a crucial role (although one important modification to the interpretation of that theory is proposed). The result is an account of how we are in contact with the world itself during perceptual experi- ence; and this leads to an account of how the world itself guides our understanding, as we move from non-sense to sense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beaton, M. (2009). An Analysis of Qualitative Feel as the Introspectible Subjective Aspect of a Space of Reasons (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, M. (2013). Phenomenology and embodied action. Constructivist Foundations, 8(3), 298–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, M. (in prep.). Conceptualism and animal minds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, R. D. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive behavior, 11(4), 209–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bimbenet, E. (2009). Merleau-Ponty and the quarrel over the conceptual contents of perception. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 30(1), 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, A., & Logue, H. (Eds). (2009). Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, L. (1895). What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind, 4(14), 278–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuard, P. (2006). Demonstrative concepts without re-identification. Philosophical Studies, 130, 153–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1973). Radical interpretation. Dialectica, 27, 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1974). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Paolo, E. A., Barandiaran, X., Beaton, M., & Buhrmann, T. (2014). Learning to perceive in the sensorimotor approach: Piaget’s theory of equilibration interpreted dynamically. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(551). doi: 10.3389/ fnhum.2014.00551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z. (2012). Conscious versus unconscious learning of structure. In P. Rebuschat, & J. N. Williams (Eds), Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition (pp. 337–364). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. (2005). Overcoming the myth of the mental: how philosophers can profit from the phenomenology of everyday expertise. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 79(2), 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddock, A., & Macpherson, F. (Eds) (2008). Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • anna, R. (2011). Beyond the myth of the myth: a Kantian theory of non-conceptual content. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 19(3), 323–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. G. (2000). Non conceptual content and the “space of reasons”. Philosophical Review, 109(4), 483–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1748/1999). An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley S. (2003). Animal action in the space of reasons. Mind & Language, 18(3), 231–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo-Torres, E., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Is an embodied system ever purely reactive? In M. S. Capcanere, A. A. Freitas, P. J. Bentley C. G. Johnson, & J. Timmis (Eds), Advances in Artificial Life: 8 th European Conference, EC AL 2005 (pp. 252–261). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1781/1787/1996). Critique of Pure Reason. (W. S. Pluhar, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. D. (2001a). Demonstrative concepts and experience. Philosophical Review, 110(3), 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly S. D. (2001b). The non-conceptual content of perceptual experience: situation dependence and fineness of grain. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62(3), 601–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, I. (1951/1964). The formation and transformation of the perceptual world. Psychological Issues, 3 (4, Monogr. No. 12), 1–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, D. (2013). Leiblichkeit und Begrifflichkeit. Ìberlegungen zum Begriff der Wahrnehmung nach McDowell und Merleau-Ponty. In K. Mertens, & I. Günzler (Eds), Wahrnehmen — Fühlen — Handeln: Phänomenologie im Wettstreit der Methoden (pp. 365–381). Münster, Germany: Mentis Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. (2007). What myth? Inquiry, 50(4), 338–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. (2009). Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, S. (inpress). Natural descriptions and anthropicbias: extant problems in Solomonoff induction. Language, Life, Limits — 10th Conference on Computability in Europe, CiE 2014, Budapest, Hungary, June 23 — 27, 2014. Proceedings. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noë, A. (1999). Thought and experience. American Philosophical Quarterly, 36, 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noë, A. (2002). Is the visual world a grand illusion? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(5-6), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C. (2001a). Does perception have a nonconceptual content? Journal of Philosophy, 98, 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C. (2001b). Phenomenology and nonconceptual content. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62(3), 609–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I. (1997). Indirect Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskies, A. L. (2008). A new argument for nonconceptual content. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76(3), 633–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roskies, A. L. (2010). “That” response doesn’t work: against a demonstrative defense of conceptualism. Nous, 44(1), 112–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandis, C. (2010). Basic actions and individuation. In T. O’Connor, & C. Sandis (Eds), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action (pp. 10–17). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedivy, S. (2006). Nonconceptual epicycles. European Review of Philosophy, 6, 31–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedivy, S. (2008). Starting afresh disjunctively: perceptual engagement with the world. In A. Haddock, & R Macpherson (Eds), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge (pp. 348–375). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl, & M. Scriven (Eds), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume I: The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psycholog)’ and Psychoanalysis (pp. 253–329). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S. (1988). On knowing one’s own mind. Philosophical Perspectives, 2, 183–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (2006). Desires are not propositional attitudes. Dialogue, 45, 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2001). Philosophical Investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Michael Beaton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beaton, M. (2014). Learning to Perceive What We Do Not Yet Understand: Letting the World Guide Us. In: Cappuccio, M., Froese, T. (eds) Enactive Cognition at the Edge of Sense-Making. New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137363367_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics